|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to create a starfield with a white background
similar to this one: http://gallery.artofgregmartin.com/t...tar_field.html (except this one has a black background). I managed to get the stars displaying nicely but I'm still having trouble creating the glow effect. If I use linear burn, the glow becomes unnatural (sharpish around the edges and not very glowy). I also tried playing around with the colour balance and the edges of the glow seem to have smoothed out a wee bit but still not enough. Am I taking the wrong approach to do this or does someone have a better way to accomplish the effect? Thanks! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Aug 14, 12:05 pm, Cornofstarchy <cornofstar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone, I'm trying to create a starfield with a white background Hi, I think you should look at blurring (Filter>Blur>Gausian>Blur) a clouds layer (Filer>Render>Clouds) then using that blurred layer as a mask for the original unblurred layer. Good luck, Ron |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Aug 14, 3:50pm, "ronvi...@gmail.com" <ronvi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 12:05 pm, Cornofstarchy <cornofstar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, I'm trying to create a starfield with a white background > > Hi, > I think you should look at blurring (Filter>Blur>Gausian>Blur) a > clouds layer (Filer>Render>Clouds) then using that blurred layer as a > mask for the original unblurred layer. > > Good luck, > Ron Hi Ron, I'll look into the mask thing (not very good at masking) but I will try. Thanks for the suggestion! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Cornofstarchy wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion! You're welcome. The tutorial you are working from is a very good one. I remember it from when I was starting out. With the approach I suggested you can vary the radius of the blur and the scale of the noise to get more gas and particles. You can also apply it locally, like for a cluster, by flattening the layer then using the paint brush on another mask. Masks are something worth spending a lot of time on. Good luck, Ron |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Aug 18, 5:32am, "ronvi...@gmail.com" <ronvi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cornofstarchy wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion! > > You're welcome. The tutorial you are working from is a very good one. > I remember it from when I was starting out. With the approach I > suggested you can vary the radius of the blur and the scale of the > noise to get more gas and particles. You can also apply it locally, > like for a cluster, by flattening the layer then using the paint brush > on another mask. > Masks are something worth spending a lot of time on. > > Good luck, > Ron Did you happen to use another tutorial for the masks? A good one perhaps? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Aug 18, 7:07 pm, Cornofstarchy <cornofstar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 5:32 am, "ronvi...@gmail.com" <ronvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cornofstarchy wrote: > tutorial for the masks? Not really, at least not one I can remember. Mostly I posted about a million questions to this forum. Some of the best tutorials are at retouchpro.com. I do not know of any specific ones because they will not let me join, because I use google for email, but I know they have a lot of useful information as well as many nice and ful members. Why are you learning Photoshop? What area of graphics are you in or planning to be in? |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:01:45 -0700 (PDT), "ronviers@gmail.com"
<ronviers@gmail.com> wrote: >I do not know of any specific ones because they will >not let me join, because I use google for email ....Which is really retarded, because gmail's pretty reliable WRT not allowing spammers to stick around. But some forum admins set up shop not to provide a forum so people can one another, but so they can play sick power tripping games. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Aug 19, 9:13 pm, OM <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:01:45 -0700 (PDT), "ronvi...@gmail.com" > > <ronvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >I do not know of any specific ones because they will > >not let me join, because I use google for email > > ...Which is really retarded, because gmail's pretty reliable WRT not > allowing spammers to stick around. But some forum admins set up shop > not to provide a forum so people can one another, but so they can > play sick power tripping games. > > OM > -- > ]=====================================[ > ] OMBlog -http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ > ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ > ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ > ]=====================================[ I assumed that the policy would be a short-term fix while they made adjustments, I am a member of several other forums and they managed to work it out, but I checked back recently and the ban remains in place – I guess they are happy with the fix. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|