$query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
FROM $table
Order by names";
$result = mysql_query($query);

In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in a
query where other possible choices are included? How do I use 'Order
by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names' when "All"
is
selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks

$query = "SELECT *
FROM $table
WHERE 1 = 1 ";
if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
$status."'";
if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
$result = mysql_query($query);

On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
> FROM $table
> Order by names";
> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in a
> query where other possible choices are included? How do I use 'Order
> by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names' when "All"
> is
> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>
> $query = "SELECT *
> FROM $table
> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
> $status."'";
> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
> $result = mysql_query($query);

ORDER BY names

the whole WHERE clause is superfluous in this query.

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
> On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
>> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
>> FROM $table
>> Order by names";
>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
>> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in a
>> query where other possible choices are included? How do I use 'Order
>> by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names' when "All"
>> is
>> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
>> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>>
>> $query = "SELECT *
>> FROM $table
>> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
>> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
>> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
>> $status."'";
>> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> ORDER BY names

just a note about legibility here...

$sql[] = "
SELECT *
FROM " . $table . "
WHERE 1 = 1
";
if ($year != 'ALL')
{
$sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";
}
if ($status != 'ALL')
{
$sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";
}
if ($names != 'ALL')
{
$sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";
}
$sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);

that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so that
when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and formatted in
the browser.

On Nov 8, 4:34 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
> >> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
> >> FROM $table
> >> Order by names";
> >> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> >> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
> >> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in a
> >> query where other possible choices are included? How do I use 'Order
> >> by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names' when "All"
> >> is
> >> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
> >> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>
> >> $query = "SELECT *
> >> FROM $table
> >> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
> >> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
> >> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
> >> $status."'";
> >> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
> >> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> > ORDER BY names
>
> just a note about legibility here...
>
> $sql[] = "
> SELECT *
> FROM " . $table . "
> WHERE 1 = 1
> ";
> if ($year != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";}
>
> if ($status != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";}
>
> if ($names != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";}
>
> $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>
> that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
> conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so that
> when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and formatted in
> the browser.

You and your formatting again You won't give up until you educate
all newbies to
proper formatting, eh?

Cheers

"Darko" <darko.maksimovic@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194548559.891114.33150@v23g2000prn.googlegro ups.com...
> On Nov 8, 4:34 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
>> "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
>> >> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
>> >> FROM $table
>> >> Order by names";
>> >> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> >> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
>> >> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in a
>> >> query where other possible choices are included? How do I use 'Order
>> >> by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names' when "All"
>> >> is
>> >> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
>> >> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>>
>> >> $query = "SELECT *
>> >> FROM $table
>> >> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
>> >> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
>> >> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
>> >> $status."'";
>> >> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
>> >> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> > ORDER BY names
>>
>> just a note about legibility here...
>>
>> $sql[] = "
>> SELECT *
>> FROM " . $table . "
>> WHERE 1 = 1
>> ";
>> if ($year != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";}
>>
>> if ($status != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";}
>>
>> if ($names != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";}
>>
>> $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>>
>> that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
>> conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so that
>> when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and formatted
>> in
>> the browser.
>
> You and your formatting again You won't give up until you educate
> all newbies to
> proper formatting, eh?

he, he, he, he!

well, actually the formatting is just a bonus. some db's, even though they
strip out spaces themselves when parsing, will caugh up errors if the
clauses run together...which happens the way the op wrote it...where 1=1and
year='2007'and status=... building $sql as an array and then imploding it
back on itself avoids the problem and also makes for more clearly defined if
() cases.

but, i'm still chuckling. that was good.

Steve wrote:
> "Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
>> On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
>>> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
>>> FROM $table
>>> Order by names";
>>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>>
>>> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
>>> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in
>>> a query where other possible choices are included? How do I use
>>> 'Order by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names'
>>> when "All" is
>>> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
>>> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>>>
>>> $query = "SELECT *
>>> FROM $table
>>> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
>>> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
>>> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
>>> $status."'";
>>> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
>>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> ORDER BY names
>
> just a note about legibility here...
>
> $sql[] = "
> SELECT *
> FROM " . $table . "
> WHERE 1 = 1
> ";
> if ($year != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";
> }
> if ($status != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";
> }
> if ($names != 'ALL')
> {
> $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";
> }
> $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>
> that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
> conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so
> that when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and
> formatted in the browser.

Please learn to post replies to the correct post. I do not need advise on
formatting, the OP may do!

"Paul Lautman" <paul.lautman@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:5phaqhFrfrejU1@mid.individual.net...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegro ups.com...
>>> On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
>>>> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
>>>> FROM $table
>>>> Order by names";
>>>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>>>
>>>> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
>>>> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in
>>>> a query where other possible choices are included? How do I use
>>>> 'Order by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names'
>>>> when "All" is
>>>> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
>>>> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>>>>
>>>> $query = "SELECT *
>>>> FROM $table
>>>> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
>>>> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
>>>> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
>>>> $status."'";
>>>> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
>>>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>>
>>> ORDER BY names
>>
>> just a note about legibility here...
>>
>> $sql[] = "
>> SELECT *
>> FROM " . $table . "
>> WHERE 1 = 1
>> ";
>> if ($year != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";
>> }
>> if ($status != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";
>> }
>> if ($names != 'ALL')
>> {
>> $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";
>> }
>> $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>>
>> that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
>> conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so
>> that when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and
>> formatted in the browser.
>
> Please learn to post replies to the correct post. I do not need advise on
> formatting, the OP may do!

first of all, it's a thread, dude. second, it's usenet. like it, or lump it.

On 8 Nov, 20:45, "Paul Lautman" <paul.laut...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegr oups.com...
> >> On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
> >>> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
> >>> FROM $table
> >>> Order by names";
> >>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> >>> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
> >>> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in
> >>> a query where other possible choices are included? How do I use
> >>> 'Order by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names'
> >>> when "All" is
> >>> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
> >>> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>
> >>> $query = "SELECT *
> >>> FROM $table
> >>> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
> >>> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
> >>> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
> >>> $status."'";
> >>> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
> >>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>
> >> ORDER BY names
>
> > just a note about legibility here...
>
> > $sql[] = "
> > SELECT *
> > FROM " . $table . "
> > WHERE 1 = 1
> > ";
> > if ($year != 'ALL')
> > {
> > $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";
> > }
> > if ($status != 'ALL')
> > {
> > $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";
> > }
> > if ($names != 'ALL')
> > {
> > $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";
> > }
> > $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>
> > that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
> > conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so
> > that when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and
> > formatted in the browser.
>
> Please learn to post replies to the correct post. I do not need advise on
> formatting, the OP may do!

Definitely not, but some advice on spelling (and punctuation) wouldn't
go amiss. He he he ;-)

"strawberry" <zac.carey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194560072.097968.186940@s15g2000prm.googlegr oups.com...
> On 8 Nov, 20:45, "Paul Lautman" <paul.laut...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Steve wrote:
>> > "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:1194534736.193031.304830@q5g2000prf.googlegr oups.com...
>> >> On 8 Nov, 14:13, jc...@lycos.com wrote:
>> >>> $query = "SELECT DISTINCT names
>> >>> FROM $table
>> >>> Order by names";
>> >>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> >>> In the code above, 'Order by' works very well when not used in
>> >>> conjunction with other query-able items but how about when used in
>> >>> a query where other possible choices are included? How do I use
>> >>> 'Order by' in the query below where it will only act on 'names'
>> >>> when "All" is
>> >>> selected and otherwise, not really be active during the query as in
>> >>> the code below? I'm using PHP to access MySQL. Thanks
>>
>> >>> $query = "SELECT *
>> >>> FROM $table
>> >>> WHERE 1 = 1 ";
>> >>> if($year != "All") $query .= "and year = '".$year."'";
>> >>> if($status != "All") $query .= "and status = '".
>> >>> $status."'";
>> >>> if($names != "All") $query .= "and names = '".$names."'";
>> >>> $result = mysql_query($query);
>>
>> >> ORDER BY names
>>
>> > just a note about legibility here...
>>
>> > $sql[] = "
>> > SELECT *
>> > FROM " . $table . "
>> > WHERE 1 = 1
>> > ";
>> > if ($year != 'ALL')
>> > {
>> > $sql[] = " AND year = '" . $year . "'";
>> > }
>> > if ($status != 'ALL')
>> > {
>> > $sql[] = " AND status = '" . $status. "'";
>> > }
>> > if ($names != 'ALL')
>> > {
>> > $sql[] = " AND names = '" . $names. "'";
>> > }
>> > $sql = implode("\r\n", $sql);
>>
>> > that avoide the problem of forgetting to put a space between the if'd
>> > conditions/criterion. note, i put the spaces before 'and' simply so
>> > that when i go to debug the current sql being run, it echos nice and
>> > formatted in the browser.
>>
>> Please learn to post replies to the correct post. I do not need advise on
>> formatting, the OP may do!
>
> Definitely not, but some advice on spelling (and punctuation) wouldn't
> go amiss. He he he ;-)

sorry, if you look at my posts, they're splintered with errors on all
counts. hell, i even leave out words altogether sometimes...damn fingers
just can't keep up.

On 8 Nov, 21:40, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
| first of all, it's a thread, dude.
Err no. A thread is a linked collection of posts on a particular
subject. When you post a reply you do so to a previous post within a
thread, dude.

| second, it's usenet. like it, or lump it.
It is not usenet's fault. Usenet is quite capable of attaching
responses correctly. What is needed is a bit of intelligence on the
part of the user, dude.

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194603188.838479.254790@k79g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
> On 8 Nov, 21:40, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> | first of all, it's a thread, dude.
> Err no. A thread is a linked collection of posts on a particular
> subject. When you post a reply you do so to a previous post within a
> thread, dude.

hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
dashing, stand-out point here.

> | second, it's usenet. like it, or lump it.
> It is not usenet's fault. Usenet is quite capable of attaching
> responses correctly. What is needed is a bit of intelligence on the
> part of the user, dude.

actually, usenet is a venue and takes *no* action in attaching messages to
others...dude. perhaps you should have a look at the nntp protocol and learn
how it all works. either way, your bit ot an attempt at insults is lost in
translation since it went to intellect - the irony meter just went of the
scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no* idea
work.

as for my exact point, it's usenet. people do what they like. the internet
and all it's venues are supremely facist-free at this point. bitching about
how people behave on the internet is a moot point at best.

next time, try harder...dude.

On Nov 9, 6:08 am, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1194603188.838479.254790@k79g2000hse.googlegr oups.com...
>
> > On 8 Nov, 21:40, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> > | first of all, it's a thread, dude.
> > Err no. A thread is a linked collection of posts on a particular
> > subject. When you post a reply you do so to a previous post within a
> > thread, dude.
>
> hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
> reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
> dashing, stand-out point here.
>
> > | second, it's usenet. like it, or lump it.
> > It is not usenet's fault. Usenet is quite capable of attaching
> > responses correctly. What is needed is a bit of intelligence on the
> > part of the user, dude.
>
> actually, usenet is a venue and takes *no* action in attaching messages to
> others...dude. perhaps you should have a look at the nntp protocol and learn
> how it all works. either way, your bit ot an attempt at insults is lost in
> translation since it went to intellect - the irony meter just went of the
> scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no* idea
> work.
>
> as for my exact point, it's usenet. people do what they like. the internet
> and all it's venues are supremely facist-free at this point. bitching about
> how people behave on the internet is a moot point at best.
>
> next time, try harder...dude.

Thanks for your guys. Appreciate it very much.
john cage

On 9 Nov, 14:08, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
> reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
> dashing, stand-out point here.

And you posted the reply attached to the wrong previous post

> people do what they like
People like you obviously do. Others have more sense.

> the irony meter just went of the
> scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no* idea
> work.
Now that's ironic coming from you!

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194624587.319538.252680@v2g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
> On 9 Nov, 14:08, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
>> hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
>> reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
>> dashing, stand-out point here.
>
> And you posted the reply attached to the wrong previous post

'wrong'? no, i responded to the one i intended to respond to.

>> people do what they like
> People like you obviously do. Others have more sense.

'people like me'? you mean those who aren't so bent up about fictious or
preceived rules? and the ones with more sense, those who enjoy the binding
that holds to tightly bundled sticks together. (based on your iq, i doubt
you even get to what that refers.)

>> the irony meter just went of the
>> scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no*
>> idea
>> work.
> Now that's ironic coming from you!

really? here's a clue. when hurling insults that actually hit a target, it
is best to provide examples...like when you say things like usenet does this
or that when it actually doesn't. see, that's so well delivered that the
hilarity is just a side-line bene. the meat of the comment was to show you
have no idea about what you're trying to discuss.

on that note, please inform us all of what irony i specifically provide. if
you don't, we call that a red-herring coupled with ad-homonym - a diversion
from your previous embarrassment.