|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
Currently at my hosting company, we are using MySQL 5.0. All our tables are of InnoDB type. I chose this at one time b/c it supported use of foreign key constraints. My hosting company now tells me InnoDB tables are not optimized for disk usage reporting in real time. My questions are: 1. Is there another table type I can use that supports foreign key constraints that is better for disk usage reporting? 2. Is there another table type I can use that supports foreign key constraints and uses less disk space? 3. How can I change the type of a table without losing the data? Thanks, - Dave |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:32:08 +0200, laredotornado@zipmail.com
<laredotornado@zipmail.com> wrote: > Currently at my hosting company, we are using MySQL 5.0. All our > tables are of InnoDB type. I chose this at one time b/c it supported > use of foreign key constraints. My hosting company now tells me > InnoDB tables are not optimized for disk usage reporting in real > time. And you told them it is not your job to report disk usage to them, or do you have a job there instead of being a client? If they are really complaining, just switch. It should not be a big deal. Why the hell would the need 'real-time' disk usage by the way? An average to control wether you're not using more then you pay for, and a server not overclogged with clients all to the max should be all they need. > 1. Is there another table type I can use that supports foreign key > constraints that is better for disk usage reporting? > > 2. Is there another table type I can use that supports foreign key > constraints and uses less disk space? Sorry, don't know the answer to those 2, never needed to jump through hoops for that... > 3. How can I change the type of a table without losing the data? ALTER TABLE tablename ENGINE = enginename; What repercussions this has for your relations etc. would depend on what engine to what engine. Moral of the story: disk space is dirt cheap. Cases where the hours you spent on tracking use and minimizing it are more costeffective then just to buy more/bigger ones are rare, very rare. -- Rik Wasmus |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|