|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
I have a big SCSI attached RAID box that is currently running on a 32 bit Windows Server 2003 Standard Server (SP2). I need to connect it to a server running 64 bit. If I do that will the data survive the change? Does 64 bit need to change anything in NTFS? Thanks. Dennis Gee |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Did I say something wrong? Does anyone have any experience with this?
DG "dgeedgee" wrote: > Hi, > I have a big SCSI attached RAID box that is currently running on a 32 bit > Windows Server 2003 Standard Server (SP2). I need to connect it to a server > running 64 bit. If I do that will the data survive the change? Does 64 bit > need to change anything in NTFS? Thanks. > Dennis Gee |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
dgeedgee wrote:
> Did I say something wrong? Does anyone have any experience with this? > DG > > "dgeedgee" wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have a big SCSI attached RAID box that is currently running on a >> 32 bit Windows Server 2003 Standard Server (SP2). I need to connect >> it to a server running 64 bit. If I do that will the data survive >> the change? Does 64 bit need to change anything in NTFS? Thanks. >> Dennis Gee NTFS doesn't have such a distinction. The driver for the raid controller will of course need to be different and the vendor *may* implement changes, but the NTFS format doesn't change. Permissions *may* be valid if it's still in the same domain and there's no local groups. Still, a complete and verified backup is appropriate. Not expecting to boot from the existing array, right? -- /kj |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|