http://www.tyrell-innovations-usa.co...sBrownInfo.htm


http://tyrell-innovations-usa.com/shack3d/

If you are selling this product how come you only show drawings of the
product?


"admin" <admin@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fq1piu$825$49@news.onet.pl...
> http://www.tyrell-innovations-usa.co...sBrownInfo.htm
>
>
> http://tyrell-innovations-usa.com/shack3d/
>
>

Mr. Obvious,

Why couldn't you do the same thing with the transform option in Photoshop?
Seems to be an even easier and much less expensive way to accomplish the
same thing....


"admin" <admin@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:fq1piu$825$49@news.onet.pl...

"bolo" <someone@someplace.org> wrote:
>Mr. Obvious,
>
>Why couldn't you do the same thing with the transform option in Photoshop?
>Seems to be an even easier and much less expensive way to accomplish the
>same thing....
>

Could you give us a link to an example of your simple method?
Greetings, Alex

No, I wish I could. I have never done it, but seems pretty simple to do -
thinking about it. All you would have to do is copy the image and transform
it by mirroring it, and then smoothing the edges. It seems to me it would
give the same appearance. Perhaps Katwoman, Granny or Colin could tell us.
They seem to be the most knowledgeable and ful (at least to me) of
anyone on this group. :-)

I guess you could even use the photomerge option and merge the two images
after you copy and rotate it. I may work on this today. Never really
thought about doing it, or why you would. I have several images from the
Spanish American war that are stereo scope.
"Alex" <Alex@Alex.org> wrote in message
news:part1of1.1.eXWAyiarcMPiSg@ue.ph...
> "bolo" <someone@someplace.org> wrote:
>>Mr. Obvious,
>>
>>Why couldn't you do the same thing with the transform option in Photoshop?
>>Seems to be an even easier and much less expensive way to accomplish the
>>same thing....
>>
>
> Could you give us a link to an example of your simple method?
> Greetings, Alex
>

Alex <Alex@Alex.org> wrote:

> "bolo" <someone@someplace.org> wrote:
> >Mr. Obvious,
> >
> >Why couldn't you do the same thing with the transform option in Photoshop?
> >Seems to be an even easier and much less expensive way to accomplish the
> >same thing....
> >
>
> Could you give us a link to an example of your simple method?
> Greetings, Alex

Hmmm I thought it was another spam so I kill-filed the poster without
reading the messages (I believe I saw more than one?). I don't know what
the original message says, but about 3D stuff I can give some info

- There are some plug-ins, actions or trick to turn a regular photos into
3D. I tried to view some of them without 3D glass so I can't see any
sepcial but kinda blurry, OFF photo.

- And there are expensive and cheap adapter to add to film and digital
camera, as well as some tricks to turn 2 (some uses 3 lenses) cheap digital
cameras into 3D camera. Or it uses 2 lenses to capture the left/right
edges/angles of the object then merge them together.

"bolo" <someone@someplace.org> wrote:
>No, I wish I could. I have never done it, but seems pretty simple to do -
>thinking about it. All you would have to do is copy the image and transform
>it by mirroring it, and then smoothing the edges. It seems to me it would
>give the same appearance. Perhaps Katwoman, Granny or Colin could tell us.
>They seem to be the most knowledgeable and ful (at least to me) of
>anyone on this group. :-)
>
>I guess you could even use the photomerge option and merge the two images
>after you copy and rotate it. I may work on this today. Never really
>thought about doing it, or why you would. I have several images from the
>Spanish American war that are stereo scope.

I can't see how you would put any kind of parallax into a copy of an image by
using Photoshop, but if you can I'm interested to know how you did it.
Greetings, Alex

Well from the example on his web site, i really did not see any 3d effects,
did you?
"Alex" <Alex@Alex.org> wrote in message
news:part1of1.1.MsF$DmkrjiRetA@ue.ph...
> "bolo" <someone@someplace.org> wrote:
>>No, I wish I could. I have never done it, but seems pretty simple to do -
>>thinking about it. All you would have to do is copy the image and
>>transform
>>it by mirroring it, and then smoothing the edges. It seems to me it would
>>give the same appearance. Perhaps Katwoman, Granny or Colin could tell
>>us.
>>They seem to be the most knowledgeable and ful (at least to me) of
>>anyone on this group. :-)
>>
>>I guess you could even use the photomerge option and merge the two images
>>after you copy and rotate it. I may work on this today. Never really
>>thought about doing it, or why you would. I have several images from the
>>Spanish American war that are stereo scope.
>
> I can't see how you would put any kind of parallax into a copy of an image
> by
> using Photoshop, but if you can I'm interested to know how you did it.
> Greetings, Alex
>