|
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important".
I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What is the correct way? TIA -- <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
<ng4rrjanbiah@rediffmail.com> wrote: > I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". > I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What > is the correct way? TIA I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a delimiter. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mar 20, 3:41 pm, "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah > > <ng4rrjanb...@rediffmail.com> wrote: > > I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". > > I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What > > is the correct way? TIA > > I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a > delimiter.http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules "important" is the meaning and I understand it. But, think about the situation of teacher who has to refer the notation when he write it on board; how should he refer? <OT> Here in South India, people refer a*b as "a into b". But, lately I have seen that Dijkstra refers it as "a times b" (in a google video). </OT> -- <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
> On Mar 20, 3:41 pm, "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoe...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:44 +0100, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah >> >> <ng4rrjanb...@rediffmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". >>> I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What >>> is the correct way? TIA >> I just call it 'important', because that what it is. The ! is just a >> delimiter.http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#important-rules > > "important" is the meaning and I understand it. But, think about > the situation of teacher who has to refer the notation when he write > it on board; how should he refer? > > <OT> > Here in South India, people refer a*b as "a into b". But, lately I > have seen that Dijkstra refers it as "a times b" (in a google video). > </OT> Really? In the US, "a into b" means "b divided by a" = b/a. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mar 20, 4:21 pm, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
<ng4rrjanb...@rediffmail.com> wrote: <snip> > <OT> > Here in South India, people refer a*b as "a into b". But, lately I > have seen that Dijkstra refers it as "a times b" (in a google video). > </OT> Yes. a/b is referred as "a by b" in Mathematical context and "a bar b" referring door numbers (e.g., 20/5). And sometimes "a slash b" in programming context. When we start discussing about countries and cultures, we'd get crazy info. FWIW, I got surprised when someone in a.e.u informed me that asking marital status in Western countries is an offense. -- <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mar 20, 4:32 pm, David Stone <no.em...@domain.invalid> wrote:
> In article > <9231b3ea-e956-40c1-9a01-4a81a0dda...@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <ng4rrjanb...@rediffmail.com> wrote: <snip> > > > > I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". > > > > I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What > > > > is the correct way? TIA <snip> > By analogy with shell scripts "bang important" > > Seems to work... In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. -- <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah wrote:
> On Mar 20, 4:32 pm, David Stone wrote: >> In article <blahblah.googlegroups.com>, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" wrote: > <snip> >>>>> I'm just wondering, what is the correct way to refer to "!important". >>>>> I currently refer it is "not important"--but I guess, it's wrong. What >>>>> is the correct way? TIA > <snip> >> By analogy with shell scripts "bang important" >> >> Seems to work... > > In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not > important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. In C, the "!" is a negator. So !bValid is not bValid. In CSS, the "!" is a deliminator, not a negator. So in speaking, it's usually not pronounced; one just says "the CSS rules marked important take precedence..." In trying to explain to novices what to write, you might use the term they understand as the "!" symbol. I call it an "exclamation mark" (or maybe "exclamation point"), and never called it a "bang." So I would say, "mark that declaration with exclamation mark-important." What do normal folks who aren't busy programming in C call the "!"? -- John Or is everyone in South India a C programmer? ;-) Read about the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/ |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah <ng4rrjanbiah@rediffmail.com> wrote:
> In C, we refer "!" as "not". So, I refer "!important" as "not > important". But, I'm still interested in official way of referring. But this is not C it's CSS, which is a totally different topic. -- Marc |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|