|
| PORTAIL | ANNUAIRE | ARTICLES | COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS | DEVIS | FORUMS | RÉDUCTEUR D'URL |
|
|
|
|
||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
03/02/2008, 05h34
|
#1 |
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
internal networking vs MS Loopback
Are there any "speed/performance" difference if you connect two VM via "internal networking" vs MS Loopback... I'm aware that loopback allow the VM to talk with the Host OS, and could offer a potential secuirty risk. But I'm wondering if Loopback is as *fast* as internal networing between two VMs on the same HOST..? thanks in advance |
|
|
05/02/2008, 10h01
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
RE: internal networking vs MS Loopback
loopback is still a network adapter in memory. Speed depends on system
capacities. "magellan" wrote: > > Are there any "speed/performance" difference if you connect two VM via > "internal networking" vs MS Loopback... > > I'm aware that loopback allow the VM to talk with the Host OS, and could > offer a potential secuirty risk. But I'm wondering if Loopback is as *fast* > as internal networing between two VMs on the same HOST..? > > thanks in advance |
|
|
|
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|
