|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Another server.
-- Geoff N. Hiten Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "John Oberlin" <JohnOberlin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F8350DA6-12A5-4930-B131-9CD2C217BBC4@microsoft.com... > If Windows and TLogs are on RAID1 and DB's are on RAID5, where is the best > place for SQL backup files? |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
USB drive so you can attach it to a recovery server.
Local backups aren't. -- Geoff N. Hiten Senior SQL Infrastructure Consultant Microsoft SQL Server MVP "John Oberlin" <JohnOberlin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F87D91FF-1B21-4646-83DB-4DE7BD2C3725@microsoft.com... >I agree that would be my first choice. However in the senario where there >is > no option but to have the SQL backups on the same server, where is the > best > place for an successful recovery. > |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
As Geoff suggests, you need to get the data off the server. However, if
your .mdf data files are on the RAID 5, and you need to first backup to the local disks, backup to the other physical disks on your server. It sounds like your only option is the RAID 1 partition. If two of your RAID 5 disks die, you still have your latest backup on the RAID 1 partition. Mark "John Oberlin" <JohnOberlin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F8350DA6-12A5-4930-B131-9CD2C217BBC4@microsoft.com... > If Windows and TLogs are on RAID1 and DB's are on RAID5, where is the best > place for SQL backup files? |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|