|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hello
Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my search engine results. I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things down. Is this true? Also am I taking the P with the use of my keywords (too many)? Is it also true that a 'Breadcrumb' s as it is textual links around the site? Any and/or tips would be very very much appreciated you lovley people :P PS can anyone sell me PR? www.roycebathrooms.co.uk |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:57:51 +0100, "Royceee"
<royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: >Hello > >Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways to >make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which has made >my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my search engine >results. >I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things down. Is >this true? >Also am I taking the P with the use of my keywords (too many)? >Is it also true that a 'Breadcrumb' s as it is textual links around the >site? >Any and/or tips would be very very much appreciated you lovley people >:P >PS can anyone sell me PR? >www.roycebathrooms.co.uk You could consider hiring us. BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote:
> Hello > > Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways > to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which > has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my > search engine results. > I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things > down. Is this true? Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> is good <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> </tr> Not because of the amount of HTML, nor because of the short title, but because of the lack of semantic mark up. It might be though that some SEs get partly the point, that big, bold and italic letters are a heading, but what kind of heading? > Also am I taking the P with the use of my keywords (too many)? > Is it also true that a 'Breadcrumb' s as it is textual links > around the site? Links . Moreover, the text between the start and end tag of the a element (aka anchor text) has more weight. The disadvantage of breadcrumbs is that they often have short anchor text :-) I prefer to have *related* links as well, with good anchor text. > Any and/or tips would be very very much appreciated you lovley > people > :P > PS can anyone sell me PR? > www.roycebathrooms.co.uk Put in the title the most important thing first. I doubt you want to brand royce (but it's not my business), so better could be: Bathroom installation - Royce Bathrooms Showroom About Royce Bathrooms, quality you expect (about us) Also, use <h1>About Royce Bathrooms</h1> instead of about us. Your menu links don't look like links. Some people might overlook them. Our location: How to reach our bathroom showroom - Royce Bathrooms or something like that. Also you might want to add some written instructions, e.g. To reach our bathroom showroom: take the xxxx bla bla bla. Yup, rewrite almost all your titles to have Royce Bathrooms at the *end* <http://www.roycebathrooms.co.uk/whirlpool_main.htm> Add content, describe that picture. Brand, dimensions, but moreover add a text that sells. "Imagine, after a hard day of work, you and your partner together relaxing in this magnificent round whirlpool made by "BRAND". Let the hot water give you and your partner the massage you both have earned. Relax and enjoy." "We can deliver this round whirlpool in x days and take care of the installation and all other needs. bla bla". And don't make it a copy paste job. (I should get paid for this, I really do :-D ). -- John Experienced Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/ Googlebot Stats: http://johnbokma.com/perl/googlebot-statistics.html |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message
news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4... > "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways >> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which >> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my >> search engine results. >> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things >> down. Is this true? > > Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result > in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that > you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: > > <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> > > is good > > <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> > </tr> Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster then fine. I am working on this site and had to add a calendar http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm .. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are neat and tidy. Stacey -- Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source http://www.ecraftsonline.net/ A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization http://jezsta.com |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote: >"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message >news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4... >> "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways >>> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which >>> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my >>> search engine results. >>> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things >>> down. Is this true? >> >> Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result >> in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that >> you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: >> >> <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> >> >> is good >> >> <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> >> </tr> > >Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that >you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up >when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it >isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster then >fine. > >I am working on this site and had to add a calendar >http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm >. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with >CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But >you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But >it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to >fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are >neat and tidy. > >Stacey I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also. BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:31:56 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote: >On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions" ><Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote: > >>"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message >>news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4.. . >>> "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways >>>> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which >>>> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my >>>> search engine results. >>>> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things >>>> down. Is this true? >>> >>> Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result >>> in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that >>> you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: >>> >>> <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> >>> >>> is good >>> >>> <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> >>> </tr> >> >>Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that >>you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up >>when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it >>isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster then >>fine. >> >>I am working on this site and had to add a calendar >>http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm >>. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with >>CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But >>you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But >>it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to >>fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are >>neat and tidy. >> >>Stacey > >I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites >that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure >it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover >what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also. > >BB There will be typo rank soon ![]() -- Handmade Jewelry http://www.houstoncrafts.com/pearl/bracelet-110.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...klace-110.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/bracelet-209.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:31:56 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote: >On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions" ><Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote: >>I am working on this site and had to add a calendar >>http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm >>. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with >>CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But >>you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But >>it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to >>fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are >>neat and tidy. >> >>Stacey > >I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites >that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure >it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover >what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also. > >BB Please tell me you are joking on this? No research, no evidence, no clue and bill comes up with care rank!! David -- SEO Services http://www.seo-gold.com/expert-seo-consultant.php Ode to Ethical SEO http://www.totallyduh.com/ethical-seo-expert.html |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:id41f29gucevk9edveu12g98mdcvt4evc6@4ax.com... > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions" > <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote: > >>"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message >>news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4.. . >>> "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways >>>> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which >>>> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my >>>> search engine results. >>>> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things >>>> down. Is this true? >>> >>> Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result >>> in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that >>> you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: >>> >>> <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> >>> >>> is good >>> >>> <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> >>> </tr> >> >>Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that >>you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up >>when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it >>isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster >>then >>fine. >> >>I am working on this site and had to add a calendar >>http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm >>. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with >>CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But >>you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But >>it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to >>fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages >>are >>neat and tidy. >> >>Stacey > > I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites > that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure > it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover > what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also. Wouldn't be more care to make sure it is neat and tidy also. :-) I only make sure it is valid code because I feel that it isn't my site and I am providing a service of the web design it should be valid code.:-) Stacey -- Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source http://www.ecraftsonline.net/ A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization http://jezsta.com |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|