|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which
was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the ..co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished from google.co.za. Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? www.photo-video.co.uk www.photo-video.co.za |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 25 Aug 2006 11:10:13 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote:
>Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which >was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. > >Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the >.co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished >from google.co.za. > >Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? > >www.photo-video.co.uk >www.photo-video.co.za You don't have to duplicate everything. BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I know - it was a mistake.
Big Bill wrote: > On 25 Aug 2006 11:10:13 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: > > >Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which > >was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. > > > >Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the > >.co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished > >from google.co.za. > > > >Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? > > > >www.photo-video.co.uk > >www.photo-video.co.za > > You don't have to duplicate everything. > > BB > -- > > http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html > http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html > http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 25 Aug 2006 11:46:07 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote:
>I know - it was a mistake. So is top posting. Keep going, Niki, we'll get there. BB >Big Bill wrote: >> On 25 Aug 2006 11:10:13 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: >> >> >Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which >> >was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. >> > >> >Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the >> >.co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished >> >from google.co.za. >> > >> >Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? >> > >> >www.photo-video.co.uk >> >www.photo-video.co.za >> >> You don't have to duplicate everything. >> >> BB >> -- >> >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html >> http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
what is top posing? am i in the wrong place to get here?
Big Bill wrote: > On 25 Aug 2006 11:46:07 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: > > >I know - it was a mistake. > > So is top posting. Keep going, Niki, we'll get there. > > BB > > >Big Bill wrote: > >> On 25 Aug 2006 11:10:13 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which > >> >was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. > >> > > >> >Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the > >> >.co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished > >> >from google.co.za. > >> > > >> >Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? > >> > > >> >www.photo-video.co.uk > >> >www.photo-video.co.za > >> > >> You don't have to duplicate everything. > >> > >> BB > >> -- > >> > >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html > >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html > >> http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm > > -- > > http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html > http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html > http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 26 Aug 2006 00:06:38 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote:
>what is top posing? am i in the wrong place to get here? You see? This is why we need a proper functioning FAQ. Top posting is where you post your reply at the top of a former message >Big Bill wrote: >> On 25 Aug 2006 11:46:07 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: >> >> >I know - it was a mistake. >> >> So is top posting. Keep going, Niki, we'll get there. >> >> BB >> >> >Big Bill wrote: >> >> On 25 Aug 2006 11:10:13 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Okay, so we had a .co.uk site. We then launched a .co.za site, which >> >> >was a duplicate of the .co.uk site. >> >> > >> >> >Like this we were listed on google.co.za - now we made changes to the >> >> >.co.za site so that it is not such a duplicate and we have vanished >> >> >from google.co.za. >> >> > >> >> >Do you think we've been penalized or do you think we'll show up again? >> >> > >> >> >www.photo-video.co.uk >> >> >www.photo-video.co.za >> >> >> >> You don't have to duplicate everything. >> >> >> >> BB >> >> -- >> >> >> >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html >> >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html >> >> http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm >> >> -- >> >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html >> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html >> http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm and not down here where it should be as it's in sequence. We get zillions of people coming here asking for and it s us if people follow basic long-established time-honoured usenet conventions. What was it you wanted again? BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Big Bill schreef:
> On 26 Aug 2006 00:06:38 -0700, "Niki" <niki@steenkamp.com> wrote: > >> what is top posing? am i in the wrong place to get here? > > You see? This is why we need a proper functioning FAQ. Top posting is > where you post your reply at the top of a former message Bill, If it is just for that, then don't even bother. I am and have been active or just lurking in many news-groups. Even if they have a proper FAQ and a weekly charter that tells people where to find it. 90% doesn't even bother to read it. For Niki, Do you see the structure this message has? First your question, than Big Bill's answer and then mine. The reply should be *under* the part you reply to. It makes more sense to write and read this way. -- Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/ Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|