|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.protocols.domains Topics related to Domain Style names. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Fleeing from the madness of the http://groups.google.com jungle
Water Cooler v2 <wtr_clr@yahoo.com> stumbled into news:alt.http://www.webmaster,alt.html,comp.p...tcp-ip.domains and said: > I want to create my own new website. I believe I first have to register > a domain name. I looked up Google and got a lot of links to websites > that let you register a domain name. I am asking for advise on whether > the cost to register is the only criteria for choosing a domain > registrar or is there some particular widely popular choice? > > What're the few best choices? godady has already been mentioned also take a look at joker.com - they have proved themselves easy to work with. -- William Tasso whither a trophy? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"William Tasso" <SpamBlocked@tbdata.com> wrote in message news p.s5xszgvrm9g4qz-wnt@tbdata.com...| Fleeing from the madness of the http://groups.google.com jungle | Water Cooler v2 <wtr_clr@yahoo.com> stumbled into | news:alt.http://www.webmaster,alt.html,comp.p...tcp-ip.domains | and said: | | > I want to create my own new website. I believe I first have to register | > a domain name. I looked up Google and got a lot of links to websites | > that let you register a domain name. I am asking for advise on whether | > the cost to register is the only criteria for choosing a domain | > registrar or is there some particular widely popular choice? | > | > What're the few best choices? | | godady has already been mentioned | | also take a look at joker.com - they have proved themselves easy to work | with. | Take care if you register a *.ws domain as once registered you can't transfer the registration. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"NotMe" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:wcBOf.48$RC4.12@fe03.lga...
> > Take care if you register a *.ws domain as once registered you can't > transfer the registration. > But if you're not in Samoa, it shouldn't really be a problem, should it ? -- Richard |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Richard Rundle" | > Take care if you register a *.ws domain as once registered you can't | > transfer the registration. | > | | But if you're not in Samoa, it shouldn't really be a problem, should it ? Not many of the *.ws domains have anything to do with W Samoa. The company that administers the domain is located in the USA. Most think *.ws = *.WebSite ... I doubt if the holders can even find it on a map. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Fleeing from the madness of the jungle
NotMe <me@privacy.net> stumbled into news:alt.http://www.webmaster,alt.html,comp.p...tcp-ip.domains and said: > "Richard Rundle" > > | > Take care if you register a *.ws domain as once registered you can't > | > transfer the registration. > | > > | But if you're not in Samoa, it shouldn't really be a problem, should > it ? > > Not many of the *.ws domains have anything to do with W Samoa. The > company > that administers the domain is located in the USA. > > Most think *.ws = *.WebSite ... which makes it more or less superfluous don't you think?[1] - but then I think the whole idea of TLDs wasn't properly thought out [2] - we are all familiar with the potential for confusion viz. http://whitehouse..... &c. > I doubt if the holders can even find it on > a map. I suspect the inhabitants are grateful for that. FWIW I've yet to field one single enquiry for a .ws domain - the same is also true for .info - I have one .biz on the books. [1] yes, I know - but this is a webmaster group so live with it. [2] hindsight is blessed with 20/20 vision -- William Tasso whither a trophy? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"William Tasso" <SpamBlocked@tbdata.com> wrote in news
p.s5zugccmm9g4qz-wnt@tbdata.com: > > [1] yes, I know - but this is a webmaster group so live with it. > [2] hindsight is blessed with 20/20 vision definitely maybe |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
William Tasso wrote:
> FWIW I've yet to field one single enquiry for a .ws domain - the same > is also true for .info - I have one .biz on the books. Sounds about right. I currently hold several .info and a couple of .biz names, but mainly because I have most of them in the .com and/or .net version as well. And I registered them just to avoid someone with cruel intentions doing it first. I've yet to see someone actually using any of them to reach any websites linked to them (if any). With the exception of a .info domain I registered to use with a Norwegian IRC channel for PHP programmers (which generally just contains the channel rules, starter links and a self-made pastebin). -- Kim André Akerø - kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com (remove NOSPAM to contact me directly) |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 6 Mar 2006 16:31:24 GMT, Kim André Akerø put finger to keyboard and
typed: >William Tasso wrote: > >> FWIW I've yet to field one single enquiry for a .ws domain - the same >> is also true for .info - I have one .biz on the books. > >Sounds about right. I currently hold several .info and a couple of .biz >names, but mainly because I have most of them in the .com and/or .net >version as well. And I registered them just to avoid someone with cruel >intentions doing it first. I've yet to see someone actually using any >of them to reach any websites linked to them (if any). With the >exception of a .info domain I registered to use with a Norwegian IRC > channel for PHP programmers (which generally just contains the >channel rules, starter links and a self-made pastebin). Just as a contra-indication, my experience is that .info is becoming increasingly more popular and I've got several that I deal with - both my own and those of other people (my second most popular website is on a .info domain). The big advantage of .info, at least for English speakers, is that it's a real word (or, at least, a common abbreviated word) which can make the entire domain make sense as a phrase. From here in the UK, it's often also a better choice for non-profit sites than either .org or .org.uk, as it's easy for people to get confused between the gTLD and ccTLD forms and end up at the wrong place. And, according to published stats, registrations in .info are growing faster than any other gTLD, even though it's still running in fourth place overall behind .com, .net and .org. I'd agree, though, that no-one seems to want .biz. I don't know anyone who uses it for a primary domain, and only a handful of owners who've registered it defensively and pointed it to an existing domain. Part of the problem is reputaion - all that seems to be on .biz are spammers and scammers. Mark -- Visit: http://www.CorporateContact.info - phone and email contacts for Amazon, Paypal, eBay and lots of other hard-to-contact organisations Listen: http://www.goodge.co.uk/files/dweeb.mp3 - you'll love it! |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|