|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
I've got a Windows 2003 Small Business Server running a DNS server. Usually resolving addresses (e.g. by using a web browser or by using nslookup on the command shell) works for my clients, but if the client did not resolve an address for some time, it fails. If I retry resolving the address, it usually works. I switched on logging for DNS on the server and found out that those failing requests had a very long query time (e.g. 526492 seconds for one query!) but didn't fail. So I guess the client times out and doesn't receive the answer. I found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828731/en-us and followed the instructions, but this didn't . Does anyone have an idea what I could do? Thanks in advance! Regards, Robert. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In news:1152781754.349950.174630@i42g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com,
r.g.siebeck@gmail.com <r.g.siebeck@gmail.com> stated, which I commented on below: > Hi, > > I've got a Windows 2003 Small Business Server running a DNS server. > Usually resolving addresses (e.g. by using a web browser or by using > nslookup on the command shell) works for my clients, but if the client > did not resolve an address for some time, it fails. If I retry > resolving the address, it usually works. > I switched on logging for DNS on the server and found out that those > failing requests had a very long query time (e.g. 526492 seconds for > one query!) but didn't fail. So I guess the client times out and > doesn't receive the answer. > I found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828731/en-us and followed the > instructions, but this didn't . > Does anyone have an idea what I could do? > Thanks in advance! > Regards, > > Robert. What part of 808731 did you follow? Did you run a fixup on your PIX or firewall or did you disable EDNS0? Did you test it? To test, try a query using nslookup (not ping): nslookup > www.yahoo.com if it times out here, then enter this next command to force it to use TCP instead of UDP: set vc then rerun: > www.yahoo.com If the answer comes back, then it means EDNS0 is still active or you didn;'t allow port 53 UDP max 1280 bytes thru the firewall. DNS uses UDP, then switches up to TCP if greater than 512 bytes upto 1280 bytes.EDNS0 is a new industry implementation (not just Microsoft but industry wide) that makes DNS queries more efficient. But routers and firewalls need to allow it and usually means to upgrade your firmware on the router. You can also disable EDNS0 on the Win2003 DNS server with the command supplied in the article, but you must have the Support Tools installed to have the DNSCMD command available Type dnscmd /Config /EnableEDnsProbes 0, and then press ENTER. -- Ace Innovative IT Concepts, Inc Willow Grove, PA This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights. Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP Microsoft MVP - Directory Services Microsoft Certified Trainer Having difficulty reading or finding responses to your post? Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express or any other newsreader), and configure a news account, pointing to news.microsoft.com. This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public Newsgroups. It is FREE and requires NO ISP's Usenet account. OEx allows you to easily find, track threads, cross-post, sort by date, poster's name, watched threads or subject. It's easy: How to Configure OEx for Internet News http://support.microsoft.com/?id=171164 Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations Assimilation Imminent. Resistance is Futile "Very funny Scotty. Now, beam down my clothes." The only constant in life is change... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
thanks for your answer. Ace Fekay [MVP] schrieb: > In news:1152781754.349950.174630@i42g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com, > r.g.siebeck@gmail.com <r.g.siebeck@gmail.com> stated, which I commented on > below: > > Hi, > > > > I've got a Windows 2003 Small Business Server running a DNS server. > > Usually resolving addresses (e.g. by using a web browser or by using > > nslookup on the command shell) works for my clients, but if the client > > did not resolve an address for some time, it fails. If I retry > > resolving the address, it usually works. > > I switched on logging for DNS on the server and found out that those > > failing requests had a very long query time (e.g. 526492 seconds for > > one query!) but didn't fail. So I guess the client times out and > > doesn't receive the answer. > > I found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828731/en-us and followed the > > instructions, but this didn't . > > Does anyone have an idea what I could do? > > Thanks in advance! > > Regards, > > > > Robert. > > What part of 808731 did you follow? Did you run a fixup on your PIX or > firewall or did you disable EDNS0? Did you test it? I disabled EDNS0 and tested it. Didn't fix the problem. Any other ideas? Regards, Robert. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In news:1154184837.807305.321470@s13g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com,
r.g.siebeck@gmail.com <r.g.siebeck@gmail.com> stated, which I commented on below: > Hi, > > thanks for your answer. You are welcome. But curious, many folks usually post back with the results of a suggestion offered by someone here in the groups. I'm curious if my suggestions ed. What did you do to resolve it? Thank you. Ace |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
<r.g.siebeck@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1154184837.807305.321470@s13g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com... <snip> > > I disabled EDNS0 and tested it. Didn't fix the problem. > > Any other ideas? > > Regards, > > Robert. My apologies for my previous post, if only I had looked down further!. I didn't see the answer at the bottom of your post. My apologies... I'msorry the ENDS0 suggestion didn't work. Maybe another idea is to try a different external DNS server for your forwarder. Give this one a try: 4.2.2.2. Ace |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|