iLRainyday wrote:
> let's make a example:
>
> A:192.168.0.1 B:192.168.1.1
>
>
> the solution I could reach as following:
> A:192.168.0.1 gateway:192.168.1.1
> B:192.168.1.1 gateway:192.168.0.1
>
> is right the way?and is another solution exist?
>
> sorry for my english and thanks in advance!
>

No, that won't work.

Each PC must use the Router IP on the SAME Subnet.

In article <e0rgdh$aaq$2@lust.ihug.co.nz>, Jason Tyler Tomasi <jason_tomasi@ihug.co.nz> writes:
> iLRainyday wrote:
>> let's make a example:
>>
>> A:192.168.0.1 B:192.168.1.1
>>
>>
>> the solution I could reach as following:
>> A:192.168.0.1 gateway:192.168.1.1
>> B:192.168.1.1 gateway:192.168.0.1
>>
>> is right the way?and is another solution exist?
>>
>> sorry for my english and thanks in advance!
>>
>
> No, that won't work.
>
> Each PC must use the Router IP on the SAME Subnet.

If we read that solution as (possibly) intended then workstation
A at 192.168.0.1 will have a route to B at 192.168.1.1 using a gateway
of its own IP address at 192.168.0.1.

And conversely, workstation B at 192.168.1.1 will have a route to A at
192.168.0.1 using a gateway of its own IP address at 192.168.1.1.

The effect of this is that workstation A will ARP for workstation B
(using the interface whose IP is specified as the gateway) in spite of
the fact that workstation B is not on the connected subnet associated
with the interface IP.

[Fudged from an actual cut-and-paste:]

C:\Workstation-A\> route add 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.1
C:\Workstation-A\> netstat -nr
Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 1
192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 1

C:\Workstation-A> ping 192.168.1.1
Ping statistics for 149.32.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

C:\Workstation-A> arp -a
Interface: 192.168.0.1 on Interface 0x2
Internet Address Physical address Type
192.168.1.1 02-03-04-05-06 dynamic

Many thanks Briggs,
and my sincere apologies for giving incorrect information.

Thank you