|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.protocols.tcp-ip TCP and IP network protocols. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
hi all,
I have 2 subnets, e.g. 10.10.1 and 10.10.2 netmask 255.255.254 one of the hosts belonging to 10.10.1 is located in the 10.10.2 subnet. q1: is ospf capable of handling this? q2: are there other protocols to handle this? thanks for all answers. |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In article <1142263524.890804.110070@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups .com>,
<getridofthespam@yahoo.com> wrote: >I have 2 subnets, e.g. 10.10.1 and 10.10.2 >netmask 255.255.254 A 10.10.1/23 subnet is nonsensical, did you mean 10.10.0/23? >one of the hosts belonging to 10.10.1 is located >in the 10.10.2 subnet. Why isn't that host getting an IP address in the subnet its connected to? Is it getting it via DHCP or is it manually configured? -- -- Rod -- rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
10.10.1/23 is by most firewalls considered as 10.10.0, so yes that was
meant. the question, I repeat was: given that situation, can OSPF handle this. The only good answers to me are either a yes or a no. the second question was: is any other protocol capable of handling this. Again, only a yes or a no will do; in case of a yes: wich ones. |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In article <1142322688.232529.112220@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups .com>,
<getridofthespam@yahoo.com> wrote: >the question, I repeat was: given that situation, can OSPF handle this. >The only good >answers to me are either a yes or a no. Yes. >the second question was: is any other protocol capable of handling >this. Again, only >a yes or a no will do; Yes. >in case of a yes: wich ones. That was not part of your original question, so you have directed us not to answer that. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|