|
| PORTAIL | ANNUAIRE | ARTICLES | COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS | DEVIS | FORUMS | RÉDUCTEUR D'URL |
|
|
|
|
||||||
| comp.info.servers.win Web servers for MS Windows and NT. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
01/09/2005, 14h24
|
#1 |
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
Hi
My site is hosted on an IIS server, where index.php is allowed as a directory index. I have been using http://www.mysitename.com/ as the main address, but http://www.mysitename.com/index.php?v=value as a link to results using the GET variable v. I have found that http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value also works. Is there any reason that shouldn't use this URL? Thanks, Karin |
|
|
01/09/2005, 14h29
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
Not really.
|
|
|
|
01/09/2005, 16h11
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
On whether the address http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value is OK as
an equivalent to http://www.mysitename.com/index.php?v=value where index.php is the directory index, ZeldorBlat wrote: > Not really. Could you elaborate on that? Thanks, Karin |
|
|
|
01/09/2005, 16h51
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
|
|
|
|
01/09/2005, 17h07
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
Karin Jensen wrote:
> I have been using http://www.mysitename.com/ as the main address, > but http://www.mysitename.com/index.php?v=value as a link to results > using the GET variable v. > > I have found that http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value also works. > Is there any reason that shouldn't use this URL? There might be more pressing reasons why you shouldn't *change* to using that URL. -- Jock |
|
|
|
02/09/2005, 00h35
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
Karin Jensen wrote:
> Hi > > My site is hosted on an IIS server, where index.php is allowed as a > directory index. > > I have been using http://www.mysitename.com/ as the main address, > but http://www.mysitename.com/index.php?v=value as a link to results > using the GET variable v. > > I have found that http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value also works. > Is there any reason that shouldn't use this URL? > > Thanks, > > Karin > That method works perfectly fine, in fact that's what I use. |
|
|
|
02/09/2005, 15h04
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:24:06 +0100, Karin Jensen wrote:
> I have found that http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value also works. > Is there any reason that shouldn't use this URL? > > Thanks, > > Karin Like others have said, go ahead and use the short form. Is there a reason why you ask this question? Are you concerned about some future change on the server or something? -- JDS | jeffrey@example.invalid | http://www.newtnotes.com DJMBS | http://newtnotes.com/doctor-jeff-master-brainsurgeon/ |
|
|
|
06/09/2005, 00h07
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Is this form of a dynamic webpage address OK?
Karin Jensen <k_jensen@mailblocks.com> wrote:
> ... > I have been using http://www.mysitename.com/ as the main address, > but http://www.mysitename.com/index.php?v=value as a link to results > using the GET variable v. > > I have found that http://www.mysitename.com/?v=value also works. > Is there any reason that shouldn't use this URL? Only this: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI -- William Tasso |
|
|
|
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|
