Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
gets severely flooded with SPAM again.

A coincidence?

Or an attempt at burying down those messages?

Let's not allow those messages to be buried down.
Here:

"Need advice of how to promote affiliate program. (Not spam)"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...9e26baaa?hl=en

".asia domain names available"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...d7c12c64?hl=en

"1001 Webs" <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:70cad665-e150-4bfe-bdec-1c66486fb236@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Something which has always puzzled me is why some spammers reply to their
own messages with a full copy of their original message?

> Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
> gets severely flooded with SPAM again.

These are two separate people, both of whom are well respected here.

> A coincidence?
>
> Or an attempt at burying down those messages?

If a reply "buries" a post then its time you changed your newsreader. It
doesn't matter how many replies there are to a post, a reply will never bury
a post although it may shed light on the perceived nature of that post.
--
Brian Cryer
www.cryer.co.uk/brian

Brian Cryer wrote:

> "1001 Webs" <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:70cad665-e150-4bfe-bdec-1c66486fb236@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.
> ..
>
> Something which has always puzzled me is why some spammers reply to
> their own messages with a full copy of their original message?
>
> > Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
> > gets severely flooded with SPAM again.
>
> These are two separate people, both of whom are well respected here.
>
LMFAO! Yeah, right...

On Feb 25, 11:04 am, "Brian Cryer"
<brian.cr...@127.0.0.1.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:70cad665-e150-4bfe-bdec-1c66486fb236@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Something which has always puzzled me is why some spammers reply to their
> own messages with a full copy of their original message?
>
> > Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
> > gets severely flooded with SPAM again.
>
> These are two separate people, both of whom are well respected here.
One is a proven Scammer and the other is a proven libeler.
And the more I read, the more convinced they are one and the same
person.

In any case, your notion of respectability certainly differs from that
of real respectable people.
Let's wait and see what his respectable e-mail provider thinks on the
matter.


> > A coincidence?
>
> > Or an attempt at burying down those messages?
>
> If a reply "buries" a post then its time you changed your newsreader. It
> doesn't matter how many replies there are to a post, a reply will never bury
> a post although it may shed light on the perceived nature of that post.

The biggest percentage of readers here use Google Groups, and messages
do get buried by posting SPAM threads there after.

1001 Webs wrote:
> Let's wait and see what his respectable e-mail provider thinks on the
> matter.
respectable?? HA!

> The biggest percentage of readers here use Google Groups, and messages
> do get buried by posting SPAM threads there after.
Wrong again spam monkey. They only ones that use Google Groups are the ones
to stupid to use thei ISPs news servers or spammers... And we know which
group you belong to.

Viper wrote:

> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > Let's wait and see what his respectable e-mail provider thinks on
> > the matter.
> respectable?? HA!
>
> > The biggest percentage of readers here use Google Groups, and
> > messages do get buried by posting SPAM threads there after.
> Wrong again spam monkey. They only ones that use Google Groups are
> the ones to stupid to use thei ISPs news servers or spammers... And
> we know which group you belong to.

More lies and innuendo from snakepiss, the biggest retard on usenet

--

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:57:41 -0500, "Viper" <venomx@gmail.com> wrote:

>1001 Webs wrote:
>> Let's wait and see what his respectable e-mail provider thinks on the
>> matter.
>respectable?? HA!
>
>> The biggest percentage of readers here use Google Groups, and messages
>> do get buried by posting SPAM threads there after.
>Wrong again spam monkey. They only ones that use Google Groups are the ones
>to stupid to use thei ISPs news servers or spammers... And we know which
>group you belong to.
>

Do you practice at being a moron or does it just come naturally?
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================

On Feb 25, 9:57 pm, "Viper" <ven...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > Let's wait and see what his respectable e-mail provider thinks on the
> > matter.
>
> respectable?? HA!
ATT is not respectable?
OK then, I'll inform them about it then.
Man, by the time this thread is over the only friend you'll have left
will be your own dog. As long as you keep him fed, that is ...

> > The biggest percentage of readers here use Google Groups, and messages
> > do get buried by posting SPAM threads there after.
>
> Wrong again spam monkey. They only ones that use Google Groups are the ones
> to stupid to use thei ISPs news servers or spammers... And we know which
> group you belong to.
You're either a mischieving liar or an outdated piece of scum Jerry, I
mean Viper. Or both things.
And this is No Country for Old Scumbags liars like you, who refuse to
adapt to the ever changing world of Internet.
You are rotten History Jerry, I mean Viper, and it is a good thing
that it is so.

Here, have a look at the latest stats and try to learn a little.
Hard for you I know, but give the booze a break for half a minute and
just try to concentrate:

=================== Top User-Agents by Number of Posters
===================
User-Agent
Posters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1:
G2................................................ ..............
34
2: Outlook
Express........................................... ...... 6
3: Forte
Agent............................................. ........ 5
4:
unknown........................................... ..............
4
5: Mozilla
Thunderbird....................................... ...... 3
6: 40tude
Dialog............................................ ....... 2
7:
Pan............................................... ..............
2
8:
Xnews............................................. ..............
2
9:
XanaNews.......................................... ..............
2
10:
hidden............................................ ..............
2
================================================== ==========================

================== Top User-Agents by Number of Messages
===================
User-
Agent Msgs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1:
G2................................................ ..............
67
2:
unknown........................................... ..............
24
3: Mozilla
Thunderbird....................................... ...... 20
4:
XanaNews.......................................... ..............
13
5: Outlook
Express........................................... ...... 11
6: Forte
Agent............................................. ........ 10
7:
Pan............................................... ..............
8
8:
hidden............................................ ..............
8
9: 40tude
Dialog............................................ ....... 6
10: Forte Free
Agent............................................. ... 6
================================================== ==========================

======= Bandwidth-Wasting User-Agents by Average Header Size (bytes)
=======
User-Agent Hdrs
Msgs Avg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: Mozilla Thunderbird............................. 28271
20 1413
2: Forte Free Agent................................ 8363
6 1393
3: 40tude Dialog................................... 8216
6 1369
4: MicroPlanet Gravity............................. 6791
5 1358
5: XanaNews........................................ 16911
13 1300
6: Outlook Express................................. 14164
11 1287
7: Pan............................................. 10190
8 1273
8: G2.............................................. 83119
67 1240
9: unknown......................................... 27432
24 1143
10: Forte Agent..................................... 11266
10 1126
================================================== ==========================

===================== Top Servers by Number of Posters
=====================

Posters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1:
googlegroups.com.................................. ..............
34
2:
individual.net.................................... ..............
6
3: news-peer-
lilac.gradwell.net................................ .... 3
4:
nntp.comcast.com.................................. ..............
3
5:
roadrunner.com.................................... ..............
2
6:
postnews3.readnews.com............................ ..............
2
7: hw-
filter.lga........................................ ........... 2
8:
homer.glorb.com................................... ..............
2
9:
blackhelicopter.databasix.com..................... ..............
1
10:
news.optusnet.com.au.............................. ..............
1
================================================== ==========================

======================= Top Servers by Size (kbytes)
=======================
Server Hdrs Quot Orig Sig
Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: googlegroups.com................ 81 31 46
0 159
2: postnews3.readnews.com.......... 23 30 14
0 69
3: nntp.comcast.com................ 28 20 5
1 55
4: individual.net.................. 21 12 5
1 40
5: news-peer-lilac.gradwell.net.... 3 0 21
1 27
6: newspeer1-win.ntli.net.......... 12 10 3
0 26
7: roadrunner.com.................. 3 0 9
11 23
8: corp.supernews.com.............. 8 5 4
0 18
9: blackhelicopter.databasix.com... 6 2 1
4 14
10: homer.glorb.com................. 8 2 1
1 12
================================================== ==========================

1001 Webs wrote:
> =================== Top User-Agents by Number of Posters
> ===================
> User-Agent
> Posters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1:
> G2................................................ ..............
> 34
Just shows spammers and other losers use it and it needs removed from
usenet.

On Feb 26, 3:58 am, "Viper" <ven...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > =================== Top User-Agents by Number of Posters
> > ===================
> > User-Agent
> > Posters
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1:
> > G2................................................ ..............
> > 34
>
> Just shows spammers and other losers use it and it needs removed from
> usenet.

Sure, scumbag Jerry, sure ... .
I mean, scumbag Viper ...

Sorry, in a moment of madness I forgot that I shouldn't feed the trolls.
--
Brian Cryer
www.cryer.co.uk/brian

Brian Cryer wrote:

> Sorry, in a moment of madness I forgot that I shouldn't feed the
> trolls.

LOL. With a comment like "both of whom are well respected here" you
*are* the trolls...

--

On Feb 26, 11:20 am, "Brian Cryer"
<brian.cr...@127.0.0.1.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Sorry, in a moment of madness I forgot that I shouldn't feed the trolls.
> --
> Brian Cryerwww.cryer.co.uk/brian

The frankness and honesty of USENET is what made this wonderful place
a respectable forum.
Posters benefit from constant and honest exchange of ideas.
It's what makes the Usenet such an exciting place.

When you allow Scammers to take advantage of unaware posters you are
making this place and yourselves dirty and shameful.
When you side up with them, you actually become an accomplice and
therefore are committing a despicable crime for which you can be made
accountable.

This is about more than simply a fight, one scammer trying
unsuccessfully to drive away honest posters so he can go on cheating
unaware people.
It's about preserving the underlying principles of the Usenet:
openness, frankness and respectability.

Brian Cryer wrote:

> "1001 Webs" <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:70cad665-e150-4bfe-bdec-1c66486fb236@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Something which has always puzzled me is why some spammers reply to their
> own messages with a full copy of their original message?
>
>> Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
>> gets severely flooded with SPAM again.
>
> These are two separate people, both of whom are well respected here.
>
>> A coincidence?
>>
>> Or an attempt at burying down those messages?
>
> If a reply "buries" a post then its time you changed your newsreader. It
> doesn't matter how many replies there are to a post, a reply will never bury
> a post although it may shed light on the perceived nature of that post.

He's not using a news client. He's using Google Groups.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

On Feb 26, 9:23 pm, Blinky the Shark <no.s...@box.invalid> wrote:
> Brian Cryer wrote:
> > "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:70cad665-e150-4bfe-bdec-1c66486fb236@d5g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Something which has always puzzled me is why some spammers reply to their
> > own messages with a full copy of their original message?
>
> >> Another disagreement with Jerry, sorry Viper, and alt.www.webmaster
> >> gets severely flooded with SPAM again.
>
> > These are two separate people, both of whom are well respected here.
>
> >> A coincidence?
>
> >> Or an attempt at burying down those messages?
>
> > If a reply "buries" a post then its time you changed your newsreader. It
> > doesn't matter how many replies there are to a post, a reply will never bury
> > a post although it may shed light on the perceived nature of that post.
>
> He's not using a news client. He's using Google Groups.
>
> --
> Blinky
> Killing all posts from Google Groups
> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> Blinky:http://blinkynet.net

And proud of it.
Much to your dismay, I know ...