Hi, all:

I am in charge of running the affiliate program of our company.

We provide very high commission, however now I still only have less
than 100 affiliates during last 4 months. I don't know any good source
to post our affiliate info. Could you ?

Does anyone have the sucess experience of running affiliate program?

Many thanks

Eric

Rightwholesale.com wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I am in charge of running the affiliate program of our company.
>
> We provide very high commission, however now I still only have less
> than 100 affiliates during last 4 months. I don't know any good source
> to post our affiliate info. Could you ?
>
> Does anyone have the sucess experience of running affiliate program?
You ruined your "company's" rep by spamming usenet. I hope they fire you.
Plus selling worthless traffic is so 90's. Why buy junk traffic when you can
get quality traffic from the Google Adsense?

Viper wrote:

> Rightwholesale.com wrote:
> > Hi, all:
> >
> > I am in charge of running the affiliate program of our company.
> >
> > We provide very high commission, however now I still only have less
> > than 100 affiliates during last 4 months. I don't know any good
> > source to post our affiliate info. Could you ?
> >
> > Does anyone have the sucess experience of running affiliate program?
> You ruined your "company's" rep by spamming usenet. I hope they fire
> you. Plus selling worthless traffic is so 90's. Why buy junk traffic
> when you can get quality traffic from the Google Adsense?

Snakepiss, you are a retard. HTH. FOAD.

--

On Feb 22, 9:50 pm, "Rightwholesale.com" <dami.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I am in charge of running the affiliate program of our company.
>
> We provide very high commission, however now I still only have less
> than 100 affiliates during last 4 months. I don't know any good source
> to post our affiliate info. Could you ?
>
> Does anyone have the sucess experience of running affiliate program?
>
> Many thanks
>
> Eric

You'd be better off by joining an established affiliate network such
as Commission Junction, than trying to run your own.

Commission Junction is the largest affiliate network in North America,
powering almost 50% of the top 500 web retailers affiliate marketing
programs and operates worldwide.

http://www.cj.com/

Thank you very much for the ! cj.com looks great! I heard that for
the first time, really ful.

I never mean to spam. sorry for that.

Regards

Eric

"Rightwholesale.com" <dami.tree@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>Thank you very much for the ! cj.com looks great! I heard that for
>the first time, really ful.
>
>I never mean to spam. sorry for that.

You didn't spam. Your original post was entirely relevant and
sensible. It wasn't even an advert, that I could perceive.

Matt


--
The Probert Encyclopaedia
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com

On Feb 24, 7:15 am, "Rightwholesale.com" <dami.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for the ! cj.com looks great! I heard that for
> the first time, really ful.
You are very welcome.
Keep us posted on your progress and let us know how you go, either
posting here in this PUBLIC Group or through our website.

> I never mean to spam. sorry for that.
You didn't spam.
Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
He is a well-known scammer that is always on the look out for new
victims and who thinks this Group is his to rule who can or can not
post.
Since he realizes he can't make any money out of you, he regards your
honest approach as an obstacle and he's trying to drive you out by
insulting you and reporting you to Google and your ISP, as he has done
with so many.
You should report him back for libel, insults and defamatory comments,
because if you don't, Google assumes that you are guilty and marks you
as a spammer, i.e. your e-mails end up in the SPAM folder.

Here is the link to report him:
http://groups.google.com/groups/abus...3f9e26baaa%3F&

************************************************** **********
Kind Regards,

1001webs.net
http://www.1001webs.net/
************************************************** *********

1001 Webs wrote:

> Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.

Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.

Get your facts straight.

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> 1001 Webs wrote:
>
> > Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
>
> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>
> Get your facts straight.

Yeah, but since they're both retarded dickheads its an easy mistake to
make...

--

On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster

>
> Here is the link to report him:
> http://groups.google.com/groups/abuse?
>

So now Google owns Usenet?

--
D?

On Feb 24, 3:18 pm, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m...@example.invalid> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
>
> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>
> Get your facts straight.

They sound pretty much the same to me.
Same bigotry, same derogatory wanker-like comments against women, they
both think they own Usenet and can impose their rules upon the rest,
same arrogance, etc...

Furthermore, if Viper is so concerned about the integrity of this
Group, how come he remains silent when Jerry the Scammer tries to
cheat on people, as he has recently done when he offered the services
of his inexistent Corporation for the sum of $US 6.000?

On Feb 25, 1:03 am, Duende <mutb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster
>
>
>
> > Here is the link to report him:
> >http://groups.google.com/groups/abuse?
>
> So now Google owns Usenet?

I'm afraid so.

On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster

> On Feb 25, 1:03 am, Duende <mutb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster
>>
>>
>>
>> > Here is the link to report him:
>> >http://groups.google.com/groups/abuse?
>>
>> So now Google owns Usenet?
>
> I'm afraid so.
>

since when?

--
D?

1001 Webs wrote:

> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> 1001 Webs wrote:
>>> Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
>>
>> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>>
>> Get your facts straight.
>
> They sound pretty much the same to me.

Simply reading their message headers would tell you they are different
people.

This is easy in a real newsreader; with Google Gropes, you have to click
on that "Show Original" link.

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck

On 2008-02-25, 1001 Webs <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>>
>> Get your facts straight.
>
> They sound pretty much the same to me.

You're kidding, right?

> Same bigotry

I have NEVER heard Jerry spew the ignorant bullshit that Viper likes to spew.




--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
>
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> 1001 Webs wrote:
>>>> Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
>>> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>>>
>>> Get your facts straight.
>> They sound pretty much the same to me.
>
> Simply reading their message headers would tell you they are different
> people.
>
> This is easy in a real newsreader; with Google Gropes, you have to click
> on that "Show Original" link.
>

That would take intelligence - something he's completely incapable of,
as he's shown so many times in this newsgroup and others.

But that's fine. One of these days he's going to cross the wrong guy
and get his due. And I doubt it will be through the courts. There
people on usenet with some very interesting connections and even fewer
scruples than he has (if that's possible).

Of course, now he'll accuse me of threatening him, but I'm not. Just
making an observation about his actions and possible repercussions.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Feb 25, 2:52 am, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m...@example.invalid> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >> 1001 Webs wrote:
> >>> Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
>
> >> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>
> >> Get your facts straight.
>
> > They sound pretty much the same to me.
>
> Simply reading their message headers would tell you they are different
> people.
>
> This is easy in a real newsreader; with Google Gropes, you have to click
> on that "Show Original" link.

That doesn't mean a thing.
IP headers can easily be changed with the use of a Proxy.

On Feb 25, 3:00 am, Steve Sobol <sjso...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> On 2008-02-25, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>
> >> Get your facts straight.
>
> > They sound pretty much the same to me.
>
> You're kidding, right?
>
> > Same bigotry
>
> I have NEVER heard Jerry spew the ignorant bullshit that Viper likes to spew.

I have.
You must be about the only one that chooses not to hear.

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> > 1001 Webs wrote:
> >
> > > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> > > > 1001 Webs wrote:
> > > > > Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
> > > > Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
> > > > Get your facts straight.
> > > They sound pretty much the same to me.
> >
> > Simply reading their message headers would tell you they are
> > different people. This is easy in a real newsreader; with Google
> > Gropes, you have to click on that "Show Original" link.
> >
>
> That would take intelligence - something he's completely incapable
> of, as he's shown so many times in this newsgroup and others.
>
> But that's fine. One of these days he's going to cross the wrong guy
> and get his due. And I doubt it will be through the courts. There
> people on usenet with some very interesting connections and even
> fewer scruples than he has (if that's possible).
>
> Of course, now he'll accuse me of threatening him, but I'm not. Just
> making an observation about his actions and possible repercussions.

Hmmmm..... perhaps you should take your *own* advice, Stuckle?

--

On Feb 25, 3:16 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> > 1001 Webs wrote:
>
> >> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >>> 1001 Webs wrote:
> >>>> Don't pay attention to Jerry Stuckle, alias Viper.
> >>> Jerry and Viper are two entirely different people.
>
> >>> Get your facts straight.
> >> They sound pretty much the same to me.
>
> > Simply reading their message headers would tell you they are different
> > people.
>
> > This is easy in a real newsreader; with Google Gropes, you have to click
> > on that "Show Original" link.
>
> That would take intelligence - something he's completely incapable of,
> as he's shown so many times in this newsgroup and others.
>
> But that's fine. One of these days he's going to cross the wrong guy
> and get his due. And I doubt it will be through the courts. There
> people on usenet with some very interesting connections and even fewer
> scruples than he has (if that's possible).

Dear Sirs,

The holder of the account jstucklex@attglobal.net whose name is Jerry
Stuckle, uses the e-mail account you provided him with to spread
racist and sexist content and material that could result in a violent
physical act trough the Usenet.
He constantly insults and physically threatens people who disagree
with him in a most violent and despicable manner.
He also uses this account to advertise himself as the President of a
non-existent corporation and to try to fool unaware posters into
paying him for services for which he is neither registered nor
qualified.

You can read some of his posts here:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...9e26baaa?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...15ac514e?hl=en
There are many more through the Usenet archive. If you need me to
point them out, please do not hesitate to contact me.

I take for granted that ATT is a respectable company and I am
convinced that once you have been presented with the facts, you will
take the required actions.

Thank you for your attention.

--
Kind Regards,
www.1001webs.net

************************************************** *******************************************

Thank you for your report to the AT&T Internet Investigations and
Security Services Team.
This is a response to confirm that we have received your report, which
will be personally investigated by an analyst.
Your report is important to us, and we take the appropriate action on
all reports involving the AT&T network.

AT&T Internet Investigations and Security Services Team

1001 Webs wrote:
> I take for granted that ATT is a respectable company and I am
> convinced that once you have been presented with the facts, you will
> take the required actions.
>
respectable?? Can we say PINK contracts?
Please go away spam monkey.

Duende wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster
>
>> On Feb 25, 1:03 am, Duende <mutb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 24 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Here is the link to report him:
>>>> http://groups.google.com/groups/abuse?
>>>
>>> So now Google owns Usenet?
>>
>> I'm afraid so.
>>
>
> since when?
Since spam monkey made up that rule.

On 25 Feb 2008 1001 Webs wrote in alt.www.webmaster

> Dear Sirs,
>
> The holder of the account jstucklex@attglobal.net whose name is Jerry
> Stuckle, uses the e-mail account you provided him with to spread
> racist and sexist content and material that could result in a violent
> physical act trough the Usenet.
> He constantly insults and physically threatens people who disagree
> with him in a most violent and despicable manner.
> He also uses this account to advertise himself as the President of a
> non-existent corporation and to try to fool unaware posters into
> paying him for services for which he is neither registered nor
> qualified.
>
> You can read some of his posts here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...ead/thread/8c7
> 89c3f9e26baaa?hl=en
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.w...ead/thread/1e3
> f2115daca8945/d62b374515ac514e?hl=en There are many more through the
> Usenet archive. If you need me to point them out, please do not hesitate
> to contact me.
>
> I take for granted that ATT is a respectable company and I am
> convinced that once you have been presented with the facts, you will
> take the required actions.
>
> Thank you for your attention.
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
> www.1001webs.net
>
> ************************************************** ***********************
>
> Thank you for your report to the AT&T Internet Investigations and
> Security Services Team.
> This is a response to confirm that we have received your report, which
> will be personally investigated by an analyst.
> Your report is important to us, and we take the appropriate action on
> all reports involving the AT&T network.
>
> AT&T Internet Investigations and Security Services Team

Dear www.1001webs.net

Thank yuu for contacting our abuse department.

We have investigated your complaint and have concluded that you are indeed
a total wacko.



--
D?

On Feb 25, 9:50 pm, "Viper" <ven...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
> > I take for granted that ATT is a respectable company and I am
> > convinced that once you have been presented with the facts, you will
> > take the required actions.
>
> respectable?? Can we say PINK contracts?
> Please go away spam monkey.

No chance, old scumbag chimpanzee scammer,
This Group is not yours and the way it's going you'll probably will
get banned from posting here.
And it will be a good thing because your contributions are anything
but valuable.

1001 Webs wrote:
> On Feb 25, 9:50 pm, "Viper" <ven...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1001 Webs wrote:
>>> I take for granted that ATT is a respectable company and I am
>>> convinced that once you have been presented with the facts, you will
>>> take the required actions.
>>
>> respectable?? Can we say PINK contracts?
>> Please go away spam monkey.
>
> No chance, old scumbag chimpanzee scammer,
> This Group is not yours and the way it's going you'll probably will
> get banned from posting here.
> And it will be a good thing because your contributions are anything
> but valuable.
And how are you going to get me banned? From Google Groups? LMAO I doubt it.
They dont control usenet spam monkey.