|
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find
that I'm way behind the curve on this. It seems there are a lot of different ways of doing this sans custom images: <URL: http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000044.php/> This, for example: <URL: http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder/ /> Who is doing rounded corners and how are you doing it? I've been away from the stylesheet group for some time, nice to see some names I remember, but there's a quite a few missing also. Jeff |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Jeff wrote:
> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find > that I'm way behind the curve on this. Please tell me your choice of metaphors was intentional. I want to believe in you. ![]() -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Jeff wrote: > >> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find >> that I'm way behind the curve on this. > > Please tell me your choice of metaphors was intentional. I want to > believe in you. ![]() Absolutely. I thought it was too obvious to quote. Jeff > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Jeff wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Jeff wrote: >> >>> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find >>> that I'm way behind the curve on this. >> >> Please tell me your choice of metaphors was intentional. I want to >> believe in you. ![]() > > Absolutely. I thought it was too obvious to quote. > > Jeff Well, sometimes people back into those without seeing them. ![]() -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Jeff wrote: > >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> Jeff wrote: >>> >>>> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find >>>> that I'm way behind the curve on this. >>> Please tell me your choice of metaphors was intentional. I want to >>> believe in you. ![]() >> Absolutely. I thought it was too obvious to quote. >> >> Jeff > > Well, sometimes people back into those without seeing them. ![]() Now, that's funny! Have a good New Year. Jeff > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Jan 1, 3:40 am, Jeff <jeff@spam_me_not.com> wrote:
> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find > that I'm way behind the curve on this. > > It seems there are a lot of different ways of doing this sans custom > images: > > <URL:http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000044.php/> > > This, for example: > > <URL:http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder//> .... and http://www.html.it/articoli/niftycube/index.html and http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/snazzy.html and for CSS3 browsers http://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/roundshadow.html |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
In article <13njdholnlf6f59@corp.supernews.com>,
Jeff <jeff@spam_me_not.com> wrote: > I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find > that I'm way behind the curve on this. > > It seems there are a lot of different ways of doing this sans custom > images: If you have a sufficiently restricted audience, I wonder whether it is reasonable to use proposed CSS3 facilities alone. For safari and other Webkit browsers I have been testing -webkit-border-radius: 0.3em; -webkit-box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em darkblue; and the moz equivalent for Firefox. I am willing to let IE just ignore the rounded corners and so on. -- http://www.ericlindsay.com |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
mynameisnobodyodyssea@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Jan 1, 3:40 am, Jeff <jeff@spam_me_not.com> wrote: >> I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find >> that I'm way behind the curve on this. >> >> It seems there are a lot of different ways of doing this sans custom >> images: >> >> <URL:http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000044.php/> >> >> This, for example: >> >> <URL:http://www.ruzee.com/blog/shadedborder//> > > ... and http://www.html.it/articoli/niftycube/index.html > and http://www.cssplay.co.uk/boxes/snazzy.html > and for CSS3 browsers > http://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/roundshadow.html > Thanks to all. I think I will go with one of the javascript methods as it seems to degrade well, and then switch to CSS3 in the future. The CSS2 hack didn't work in my IE6 box and I really hate the idea of chopping up images and putting them in tables. Jeff |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Jan 4, 1:10am, Eric Lindsay <NOwebmasterS...@ericlindsay.com>
wrote: > In article <13njdholnlf6...@corp.supernews.com>, > > Jeff <jeff@spam_me_not.com> wrote: > > I've been seeing more and more rounded corners on containers and find > > that I'm way behind the curve on this. > > > It seems there are a lot of different ways of doing this sans custom > > images: > > If you have a sufficiently restricted audience, I wonder whether it is > reasonable to use proposed CSS3 facilities alone. > > For safari and other Webkit browsers I have been testing > -webkit-border-radius: 0.3em; > -webkit-box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em darkblue; > > and the moz equivalent for Firefox. I am willing to let IE just ignore > the rounded corners and so on. > That sounds perfectly reasonable. Square corners do not block users. Round corners might look different, but it having square corners wouldn't be a problem. Considering the downsides of supporting other browsers that don't support round corners: * extra amount of code needed (performance/dl), maintenance issue of non-semantic markup that is complicated by the appearance requirement. * extra time to develop the code. The benefits of supporting css-round corners are: * fast, easy * standards-based * forwards-compatible * configure the corners in one place in the CSS with no changes to the HTML Considering a project with time-constraints, you could: Make the round corner using the correct way (using CSS), then add a P3 bug report for an "IE appearance enhancement." to "work around limitations in IE". This way, it gives the designers a chance to take it in perspective to prioritize what's important and (hopefully) you can get more done. > --http://www.ericlindsay.com |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|