|
|
|
#26 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Rich wrote: >> Great feedback from all, and of course I've decided to ditch the >> large BG image. Thanks to all who responded. >> >> This has taught me to consider all visitors, regardless of how they >> brose, and you're right, if the designer doesn't care about the end >> user, the site is doomed ! > > Will somebody pinch me? I must be dreaming. ![]() <pinch!> Does that ? No really, we do occasionally see someone realize the advice given here is generally good advice. <g> [OT] in some thread somewhere recently, you mentioned your TR-7. <http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1658533_1658040,00.html> -- -bts -Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Rich wrote: > >> Great feedback from all, and of course I've decided to ditch the large BG >> image. Thanks to all who responded. >> >> This has taught me to consider all visitors, regardless of how they brose, >> and you're right, if the designer doesn't care about the end user, the site >> is doomed ! > > Will somebody pinch me? I must be dreaming. ![]() > > Not me. You aren't my type :-) -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ================== |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> Rich wrote: >>> Great feedback from all, and of course I've decided to ditch the >>> large BG image. Thanks to all who responded. >>> >>> This has taught me to consider all visitors, regardless of how they >>> brose, and you're right, if the designer doesn't care about the end >>> user, the site is doomed ! >> >> Will somebody pinch me? I must be dreaming. ![]() > ><pinch!> Does that ? No really, we do occasionally see someone >realize the advice given here is generally good advice. <g> Thanks! No...wait...I still see those two paragraphs. Okay, I must be having a drug reaction. Probably to not having any. ![]() > [OT] in some thread somewhere recently, you mentioned your TR-7. My 1976. Yeah, when someone was calling a 1996 vehicle old. Hah! That one's still wearing diapers. ><http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1658533_1658040,00.html> "[T]he peculiar design, which looked fit to split firewood"? It was The Wedge (that was how it was promoted). It was aerodynamic, fer crissakes. What a Wally this guy is. ![]() "The thing had more short-circuits than a mixing board with a bong spilled on it." Never had a short in my 22 years with it. "The carburetors had to be constantly romanced to stay in balance." Hah! California car -- only had one carb. Neener! "Timing chains snapped." One replacement in 22 years, and the old one didn't break. "Oil and water pumps refused to pump, only suck." Never had a pump problem in 22 years. "The sunroof leaked and the concealable headlights refused to open their peepers." No sunroof. One worn wire in a pop-up headlight caused one incidentof no-pop-up in 22 years. A three-minute fix. "One owner reports that the rear axle fell out. How does that happen?" It happens because one owner exaggerated. ![]() But yeah, the TR7 also appears in my book "The World's Worst Cars" -- but hey, that includes *150* models. ![]() Reggie: http://blinkynet.net/stuff/blinkymobile.jpg Here's the distinguishing mark of my current ride: http://blinkynet.net/stuff/blinkymobile2.jpg -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> Rich wrote: >> >>> Great feedback from all, and of course I've decided to ditch the large BG >>> image. Thanks to all who responded. >>> >>> This has taught me to consider all visitors, regardless of how they brose, >>> and you're right, if the designer doesn't care about the end user, the site >>> is doomed ! >> >> Will somebody pinch me? I must be dreaming. ![]() > > Not me. You aren't my type :-) Shagnasty did the job. And hey, you could've used tongs. ![]() -- Blinky RLU 297263 Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28 |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|