"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:q10og31keg1pjja08ks867dm2uagttbcis@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:05:52 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>>di<COCK SLAP>
>
> What's the sound of one cock slapping your face, Grasshopper?

if you'd ever take mine outta your mouth, maybe i'd find out.

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:00:49 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "G" <.@.> wrote in message
>>> news:470bd5cd$0$14146$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:12:43 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Brendan Gillatt"
>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:cJ6dnZPFErQQAJbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the
>>>>>>> definition of assembly language? Decided that Steve and I do in
>>>>>>> fact know a damn lot more than you when it comes to web-design?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he'll never say that. he usually just leaves a post dead when
>>>>>> really embarrassed, or the more it becomes obvious that he's a
>>>>>> tard, he'll throw bigger and bigger tantrums, snip your points
>>>>>> thinking that out-of-site is out-of-mind, or he makes it obvious
>>>>>> that he's ignoring your point by cutting it off with '<cock
>>>>>> slap>'...which i've started to do in turn with most of his
>>>>>> rantings. the guy's a duche with no personal life. he's piss
>>>>>> about that so he
>>>>>> vents here. sad really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Steve, at the end of the day...I have websites...
>>>>
>>>> A fan site about the Care Bears?
>>>
>>> exactly. and no client list either. ;^)
>>
>> Does the myspace thing count? Maybe he's including the out-a-box
>> blog crap too.
>> Not sure, but those Flash sites he's got going on, whew, that's
>> like, big time programming huh?
>>
>> Sheet. All those could be redone in Swish in about a day.
>>
>> LOL
>
> Then let's see 'em, Junior! Or is talking shit all the better you can
> do? And really, it's not as if you can bitch about the time it would
> take seeing as how you spend ALL FUCKIN DAY LONG replying to my posts
> with all your posturing, bloated bullshit.

I'll look for an out-a-the-box editor that's still coding to 3.2 standards
and see if I can match your stuff.
No, wait. I can't.
You're right. I can't.
I just can't write shit and dribble like you can.

Fred Doyle wrote:

> I was sorry to see Delhomme got hurt, but Carolina has credible back-up.

We've had back up QB issues all year. Lost our best prospect for the
year with a cracked wrist. Seems we're out looking for a backup with
some deep experience.
>
> I may send you some Oscar's either way. Its a real treat. The jerky is
> great and the bacon is better.
>
>

Oh, I've got your hooch aging in a Duke's mayonnaise jar as I write.
Merry Christmas.

Drew

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:05:40 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:18:21 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "G" <.@.> wrote in message
>>>> news:470bdcf0$0$14102$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:28:26 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:12:43 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Brendan Gillatt"
>>>>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> message news:cJ6dnZPFErQQAJbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the
>>>>>>>>>> definition of assembly language? Decided that Steve and I do
>>>>>>>>>> in fact know a damn lot more than you when it comes to
>>>>>>>>>> web-design?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> he'll never say that. he usually just leaves a post dead when
>>>>>>>>> really embarrassed, or the more it becomes obvious that he's a
>>>>>>>>> tard, he'll throw bigger and bigger tantrums, snip your points
>>>>>>>>> thinking that out-of-site is out-of-mind, or he makes it
>>>>>>>>> obvious that he's ignoring your point by cutting it off with
>>>>>>>>> '<cock slap>'...which i've started to do in turn with most of
>>>>>>>>> his rantings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the guy's a duche with no personal life. he's piss about that
>>>>>>>>> so he vents here. sad really.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Steve, at the end of the day...I have websites...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A fan site about the Care Bears?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One that likely generates more money in a month that your stupid
>>>>>> ass makes in a year in "allowance" money from yer idiot parents.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> My "idiot" parents thought enough to leave me with enough that I
>>>>> don't think my kids will even have to worry about making ends
>>>>> meet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand you're still living with Mom and still trying to shed
>>>>> that phat-kid look.
>>>>>
>>>>> No wonder you're into the Care Bears.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is it just to entice the youngin's across state lines?
>>>>
>>>> the latter, i'm sure. he's also admittedly into infintilism. can
>>>> you say freud?
>>>
>>> Can you say, "retard"?
>>
>> Onideus
>>
>> Well, I came close.
>
> Yeah what with how often you keep following up my posts looking for a
> little Hatter attention, you retard.

yea, we just live for your envigorating postualtions about how you like to
slap with your cock.

then again, if you've got no other use for it.

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:36:39 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "G" <.@.> wrote in message
>>> news:470bff73$0$14151$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>>> message news:kqtng31f2v91ik143nauthdliqvkt8oa8k@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:18:21 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "G" <.@.> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:470bdcf0$0$14102$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:28:26 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:12:43 -0500, "Steve"
>>>>>>>>>>> <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Brendan Gillatt"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> message news:cJ6dnZPFErQQAJbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of assembly language? Decided that Steve and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do in fact know a damn lot more than you when it comes to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> web-design?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> he'll never say that. he usually just leaves a post dead
>>>>>>>>>>>> when really embarrassed, or the more it becomes obvious
>>>>>>>>>>>> that he's a tard, he'll throw bigger and bigger tantrums,
>>>>>>>>>>>> snip your points thinking that out-of-site is out-of-mind,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or he makes it obvious that he's ignoring your point by
>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting it off with '<cock slap>'...which i've started to
>>>>>>>>>>>> do in turn with most of his rantings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the guy's a duche with no personal life. he's piss about
>>>>>>>>>>>> that so he vents here. sad really.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Steve, at the end of the day...I have websites...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A fan site about the Care Bears?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One that likely generates more money in a month that your
>>>>>>>>> stupid ass makes in a year in "allowance" money from yer
>>>>>>>>> idiot parents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My "idiot" parents thought enough to leave me with enough that
>>>>>>>> I don't think my kids will even have to worry about making ends
>>>>>>>> meet. I understand you're still living with Mom and still
>>>>>>>> trying to shed that phat-kid look.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No wonder you're into the Care Bears.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or is it just to entice the youngin's across state lines?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the latter, i'm sure. he's also admittedly into infintilism. can
>>>>>>> you say freud?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you say<COCK SLAP>
>>>>>
>>>>> did omh just post someting? something sounded like it, but i'm
>>>>> just not listening.
>>>>
>>>> nah
>>>
>>> hmmmm...k. must have been my digestive tract. i am getting hungry
>>> about now.
>>
>> Him too.
>> It's probably time for the "god daughter" to come home from school.
>> Love those lil uniforms and bobby socks.
>>
>>
>> ooooooooooooooooooo
>
> You sound pretty pedo to me, Downs.

You recognise the slang huh?

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:21:14 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> ROFL
>>
>> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
>> <html>
>> <head>
>> <title>Backwater Productions</title>
>>
>
> ...I think you need to be retarded to find that funny.

I know you're retro-tarded to use those standards.
In case you need to bone up, here you go.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:01:42 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>> news:f39pg3plojtfnu80ep3tdvp7us7111c3nr@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:13:04 -0400, Fred Doyle <fdoyle1@nycap.rr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Drew wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well Fred, I'm surprised to see you following this thread. You too must
>>>>> find delight in seeing others seeing Matthew in his true light. The only
>>>>> reason I follow such is to witness such delights.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW. Looks like both our teams are teetering on mediocrity. What say you
>>>>> that if both our teams finish at 500 or below we call off the bet out of
>>>>> shame?
>>>>>
>>>>> Drew
>>>> Actually, I only picked up on the thread on seeing your post. I can't
>>>> say I've read of followed it. (Who has THAT much time). I don't know
>>>> much about what was said about Matt in the thread, but I have to wonder
>>>> does the boy have any supporters on Usenet, anywhere? If he does, I'd
>>>> love to see just one person speak up and say that Matt's posts have any
>>>> level of value and explain what it is.
>>> No, you really wouldn't actually, cause then you'd be faced with
>>> dealing with the horrible nightmare that all your pathetic delusions
>>> are, well, just that, delusions.
>>>
>>> For fun though, here's a few links:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.2...57edcc7bec9527
>>> http://www.google.com/groups?selm=lk...ews.xtra.co.nz
>>> http://www.google.com/groups?selm=c5....svr.pol.co.uk
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.d...483f5766bb7205
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.d...e7576fa0e8a9ad
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.t...5fb514c651f41e
>> sad that you can only come up with 6 and none say anything about you NOT
>> being a troll or retard. they just didn't like the tactics of the person(s)
>> calling you out. what's even more funny is your first link...the one that
>> the 'supporter' said paraphrased, 'while none of it [your liquid shit] is
>> technically difficult...'. that's what we've been saying all along.
>
> Which explains why you can't manage to replicate the form...neither
> could that poster...neither has anyone else on the whole of the
> Internet...ever. Funny that.

I still don't understand what exactly you mean by a 'liquid layout'. One
that flows away into the sewer when JS is off? I don't actually
understand the benefits that all your 'liquid layout' gives. All I can
comprehend is that it re-loads all the images on the page every time I
make a slight resize of the page.

>> what's more sad is that you have to keep those links close at hand given the
>> thousands that exist that DO c<COCK SLAP>
>
> How is that sad, Stupid? Sad would be like you and keeping all the
> haet posts. See the neat trick is...I only bother to remember those
> that support me...all the rest, like yourself...well you're as
> forgetful as the shit I wiped off my ass this morning.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.2...57edcc7bec9527
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.2...57edcc7bec9527
- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPDvkA9dCbrNdDMRAqTDAJsHQVwkijz56i1PikndwX MEdFIhYgCfZoJG
z2/aNHS5YqmnaOcaQvtD/4E=
=C5lC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:22:04 -0400, Fred Doyle <fdoyle1@nycap.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And it costs him in his real life. For example, he posted about a job
>> interview he went for. Upon going into the interview, he encountered an
>> HR person form another job with whom he had gotten into an email flame
>> war. Needless to say, he hasn't posted back about getting the job and he
>> still works at WalMart.
>
> Lovely ASSumptions there, Freddy-tard. In Fred's messed up little
> world if he hasn't read it on teh Interwebs then it MUST not be tr00!

So tell us out right - do you work there?

>> He's a sad little guy who live with his mom at 27 and can't admit it,
>
> When your mom is dead...can you guess which one of us is going to be
> more sad? ^_^

Kinda obvious really... It doesn't take a fat idiot to select the correct
one there.

> BTW you're far too young and naive to comprehend what I meant by that
> statement...eventually though, when you're older, you will.
>
>> who hasn't had a date in more than a decade
>
> Yeah, like I'm gonna go around posting the names of all the girls I've
> dated in my life. You dribbling retards would no doubt try to attack
> them to try to "get back" at me.

Did he ask you to? I think someone is embarrassed. No one cares for their
name - I can say that probably everyone here is glad that your last date
got away from you before you started spouting your loud comments in the
real world.

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPJ/kA9dCbrNdDMRAjQCAKCCjCcRy6dQB2UfyuGFAJdywfVfIgCfX8 OW
lq4MKvByvvRY2miklv6QCro=
=RZVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:09:57 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:32:22 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You retard! That won't even work on IE 5 on teh Mac!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not to mention:
>>>>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net...m/URAMORON.swf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL, you can achieve the same effect in Flash with NO HTML or CSS code
>>>>>> and it's ONLY 280 bytes...that's a nearly FORTY PERCENT reduction in
>>>>>> size from yer idiot bloat code! 100 Kilobytes, what the fuck are you
>>>>>> thinkin, Sunshine? All you stupid ass gawd damn poser, wannabe,
>>>>>> college flunkie, halfass retards are all alike...runnin the fuck at
>>>>>> the mouth about shit you don't know about and then getting BITCH
>>>>>> SLAPPED for it.
>>>>> Oh wait, sorry, my bad. Did I say 280 bytes? Silly me, using default
>>>>> object names. *alters object names* There we go, now it's 270 bytes!
>>>>> ^_^
>>>>>
>>>>> One should probably also mention the fact that Flash allows for
>>>>> custom, embedded font types and proper font anti-aliasing, both of
>>>>> which HTML is wholly incapable of achieving.
>>>> Sure it is - I know for a fact it can do so on a Solaris graphics
>>>> workstation. Can flash do that? Ummmm.....
>>> You don't have any fuckin cl00 as to what you're babbling about, do
>>> you? Tell us, how ~exactly~ is it that your HTML code is magically
>>> embedding fonts into itself? Show us the code, Goober! LOL, this
>>> should be good for a laugh or six.
>>>
>>> And as for the anti-aliasing...um, that has nothing to do with the
>>> operating system directly so much as it has to deal with the browser
>>> and no browser I'm aware of has proper font-antialiasing (mostly cause
>>> it's seen as being too resource heavy, so they simply don't support
>>> it). In Flash you have the option to turn on and off anti-aliasing
>>> not only on the Flash file as a whole, but individual objects within
>>> the Flash construct can be dynamically set for anti-aliasing.
>
>> Ah I see where you're comprehension is failing.
>
> And here's his backpedal, get ready for it folks!
>
>> The font that a website
>> is displayed in should be up to the users to decide - why shouldn't
>> they? Their is no way that flash gives a user choice. And anti-aliasing?
>> That's also the user's choice.
>
> If you wanted to give your users a choice, you could, it'd be very
> simple. You uh, you DO know that you can style Flash with CSS in the
> same way that you can HTML, right Junior?
>
>> Flash does one sort of ant-aliasing - grayscale. It doesn't have support
>> at all for sub-pixel anti aliasing which is far, f<COCK SLAP>
>
> WRONG!
>
> It has sub-pixel anti-aliasing when you use "best" quality.
>
>>> And, once
>>> again, Flash is smaller.
>
>> No, not always.
>
> This coming from the stupid fuckin retarded prepub who just got his
> ass blistered over trying make a similar claim (or did you forget
> about your EIGHT HUNDRED PERCENT LARGER site size already). I mean,
> what is it with you, are you TRYING to get yer ass blistered? What
> are you lacking a father figure in your life and you're trying to use
> me to fill that role?
>
>>> with a greater level of cross
>>> compatibility.
>
>> Did you really just say that? Did you actually say flash has a wider
>> cross-compatibility than plain HTML?
>
> Depends on how "plain" you mean. HTML's inherent flaw is that the way
> it looks on one browser/OS is often NOT the way it will look on
> another. It's that inconsistency which makes it non cross-compatible.
> Just because you can take a square peg and rip it all up into little
> pieces doesn't mean that it fits in a round hole, cause what yer
> gettin out on the other end ain't a square peg...it's retarded
> bullshit, that's all you're getting. Flash is more cross compatible
> in that what in looks like on one machine/browser is pretty much
> exactly the way it's going to look on another machine/browser.
>
> Your deficient line of thinking is to sacrifice design

You mean your site has a good design?

> usability

Do you even check 508? You do realise that flash is nearly impossible for
screen readers to interpret.

> and
> stability

Flash is somehow more stable than plain ASCII now?

> for miniscule market gains. It's sort of like Pepsi could
> probably make a whole fuckin lot more cans and get them to more people
> around the world if they just skipped the whole "cola" thing and
> filled their cans with tap water...but uh...it wouldn't be Pepsi then,
> now would it, you stupid goober.

Please explain to me and all the other readers of usenet what exactly was
the meaning of that? I don't understand how you relate me using HTML to
filling pepsi cans with water.

>> Yet again I am astounded by your unbelievable short-sightedness.
>
> This from the retard who thinks he can embed fonts into HTML code.

When did I say that? Please quote, my usenet archives are obviously
incorrect.

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPRwkA9dCbrNdDMRAsX2AJ9uG8ADW5jQ7WdhcAAG+Y HgctnJ4gCdFsEo
iC0+Qo/vNlD179P25FBbUQI=
=8XUI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:13:46 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:53:39 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You retard! That won't even work on IE 5 on teh Mac!
>>>>> And how does that have a higher percentage of users than those which
>>>>> cannot use flash?
>>>> Um, retard, Flash works just peachy on IE 5 on teh Mac...maybe not
>>>> Flash 9, but you can go as low as Flash 4...actually maybe even lower,
>>>> but I haven't personally tested it so I won't say for certain. Unlike
>>>> you, I don't run the fuck at the mouth about shit I don't know about.
>>>>
>>>> Since the percentage of IE5 Mac users who can view your rendition
>>>> is...ZERO...obviously the Flash method is superior. Again though, yer
>>>> not so good with the numbers, what with how you think users are
>>>> somehow magically spacing their access apart on yer server to achieve
>>>> a nice median hit rate.
>>>>
>>>>>> Not to mention:
>>>>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net...m/URAMORON.swf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL, you can achieve the same effect in Flash with NO HTML or CSS code
>>>>>> and it's ONLY 280 bytes...that's a nearly FORTY PERCENT reduction in
>>>>>> size from yer idiot bloat code!
>>>>> So, sorry - I did leave the code un-optimised. By changing the names to
>>>>> single characters and removing whitespace I'd probalby get close
>>>> This is the part where you won't actually do it because you know
>>>> you're full of shit. Removing all the white space in "your" code (and
>>>> by "your" I mean the guy you ripped it off of) wouldn't really have
>>>> any significant impact at all on the overall size.
>>> Just to prove how stupid you are, I went ahead and removed all the
>>> white space from "your" code. I also removed just about every
>>> possible bit of extraneous code and this is the best that can be
>>> achieved:
>>> http://www.backwater-productions.net...rm/protal.html
>>>
>>> 654 Bytes, still about twice the size of mine
>> With probably at least 200 times more operating systems/browsers that
>> can view the text in a readable way.
>
> Sorry Dribbles, but there aren't that many Lynx users on the planet.
> Try like .000000015723 times more OS/browser combos.

So using your math you say that there are roughly 1 billion times as many
browsers that support flash than those that don't? I didn't even know
there were that many browsers out there.

> Essentially what your stupid ass is trying to argue is that Pepsi
> should fill their cans with tap water instead of cola so they can
> produce more for more people.

Sorry, what? Why would pepsi want to fill their cans with tap water?
Sounds a bit pointless to me considering they make a cola flavoured
drink. Might confuse the consumers a bit ;]

> BTW, yer ass seems to be a lil red there, what's the matter, all sore
> about getting yer ass blistered over all those Flash file size
> ASSumptions you made?

No not at all. Still blistered that I de-compiled your code to your utter
dis-belief?

> Hopefully you'll learn something from your
> spanking...although yer kind of an angsty little prepub muppet fuck
> from the Barney generation, so maybe not.

I don't understand you calling me angry. You seem to use a fair few more
vulgar words than I.

> Hell yer generation is so
> fuckin stupid they actually had to invent TWO larger "baby" diaper
> sizes just because the lot of you crack babies couldn't manage to
> potty train by the age of six.

I'm sure those were for fatties like yourself.

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPWjkA9dCbrNdDMRAmzYAKCsYCsUOEUv7wiz6etcAI jlOefp/QCdFO4g
1vurQ2wdUggsl3xPhjBrgjM=
=sjHt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:11:23 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>> I think I'm going to try and shove a baseball bat up my ass today.
>
> ...uh, that's great, Stevie.

*sigh* denial again...

Another stupid theory proven wrong, another angry guy blowing his ass.

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPX3kA9dCbrNdDMRAvbbAKDCvZe2SzgPHQ0DlhDrFZ UClSNwHwCdHqJl
ZFLzlk5bUf4xav4rq3IUKq0=
=sjKl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>> news:0ipmg31nlu5cdbbvavrgad5ub04kai8mk8@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:30:18 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:jt1lg396pru74b0jh2affmrt5dut9vk3tr@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>>> You're still a r-tard, Stupid. For all you know all those hits
>>> happened in the same hour on the same day and the rest of the time it
>>> got zero hits...yer kinda fuckwitted and stupid like that, huh?
>> oh no, no...i can say with statistical certainty of 98% that if 500K hits is
>> all you get per month, they will NOT be happening all at once...even within
>> the same hour.
>
> Are you sure, Stupid? Cause the little boy you've been molesting up
> the ass with your tongue was able to formulate a scenario in which it
> was more than probable to get an extremely high number of hits in a
> very short time frame.

He told you that you'd get 500,000 hits in an hour?

> I guess he knows more than you, huh? Of
> course, since you know nothing, I guess that's not really saying much,
> huh? ^_^

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPZokA9dCbrNdDMRAhWKAKCf8ixsIZ3QMtJjyz0M/B03rkPfHwCgiBmS
2Ro3cj23DYbBLihI1sQi+gc=
=uXPM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
news:s0npg3lb2nrdec6fasv26rece96g1cmbpd@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:03:32 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>>news:lnbpg3dpltkjo26dv2qeopko40a97e14gg@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:54:52 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Drew" <whoisthatmaskedman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:470bf3d8$0$11000$4c368faf@roadrunner.com. ..
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ah...that's why you live in a apartment. gotcha. i see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually he lives with his Mom and works as a greeter at Wal-Mart. See
>>>>> he
>>>>> was living in Walla Walla, but his grandmother got sick and moved with
>>>>> his
>>>>> Mom to Grant's Pass, OR while she took care of her. While there he
>>>>> worked
>>>>> at Dairy Queen. Well, sadly she passed away and within a few weeks
>>>>> moved
>>>>> back to Walla Walla. Either he lives and mooches off of his Mother or
>>>>> his
>>>>> family entrusted him to responsible for his ailing grandmother.
>>>>
>>>>i had gleaned that much, but with the addtional note that he lost his
>>>>job
>>>>at
>>>>dq for being caught beating off on the job...literally.
>>>>
>>>>as for 'sadly she passed away', i can only say that you are very
>>>>forgiving
>>>>of OMH. have you seen his posts under another nym? some usenet poster
>>>>whom
>>>>he didn't get along with (hard to believe, eh) had quit responding to it
>>>>(omh/malkavian)...just dropped off the face of the earth. after months
>>>>of
>>>>trying, with all the vulgarity it could muster, to get said poster to
>>>>engage, someone else said she had cancer and died. to which omh said
>>>>things
>>>>like 'great', 'who cares', 'doesnt matter to me' and worse.
>>>>
>>>>while he is a sad little man in blue glasses, i'm glad to see most
>>>>others
>>>>are still human. omh doesn't take off his troll costume - ever. fact is,
>>>>it's not a costume. i think that whatever he is in real like may have to
>>>>be
>>>>a costume hiding what is underneath...so he doesn't get his ass kicked
>>>>everyday like it probably did in grade school.
>>>
>>> And Stevie once again shows off how fuckin clueless he is.
>>>
>>> Just a lil FYI for ya...that girl Trinity...she was never actually
>>> dying of a bone marrow disease, her and I tag teamed poor Rikijoke,
>>> the wannabe hax0r. She pretended to be in love with him, then
>>> pretended she was dying, then I pretended to attack her, and then she
>>> dumped the poor fool and laughed at him...that last part being what
>>> actually drove him offline completely.
>>
>>riiiight. i'd hate to believe that there are more psycho's out there than
>>you.
>
> You really know nothing of UPA, do you? That's good though, n00bs
> like you make good targets.

so if you are mathew moulton even when you parade as omh and other nyms, you
think it is a good idea to make yourself (real or not) look like a sadistic,
narcacistic asshole?

go ahead then, punk me. i await. you're doing more damage to yourself than
anything. especially since none of this make a difference to me in the first
place. just shows you have no life if this is how you get entertainment.

btw, your story is not too believeable anyway...it involved a girl.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:26:21 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the definition of
>> assembly language? Decided that Steve and I do in fact know a damn lot
>> more than you when it comes to web-design?
>
> Actually I rather just enjoyed the idea of you wasting two or three
> hours of your worthless life typing out a 900 line posts that I won't
> ever even read. If that thought stops being so amusing I'll consider
> reading/replying to it. But really, I doubt there's anything in there
> aside from your usual miscomprehension, lies, bullshit and pathetic
> attempts at creating strawmen.

Denial again. Just can't face the plain and simple facts that you've
failed at web design. Big time.

> See the thing of it is, Brendan, I found a picture of you:
> http://fc02.deviantart.com/fs7/i/200...dangillatt.jpg

*grin* that was quite fun actually.

> ...yeah. And ever since I've seen that picture...I just...I just
> can't seem to take you seriously...at all. Maybe it's the fact that
> you look like yer still in middle school with a prepub, peach fuzz,
> scrote hair "mustache", or maybe it's those precious little baby girl
> freckles you're sportin, I dunno, but just knowing that you REALLY ARE
> some tweenage muppet fuck whose tryin to rip off someone else's
> blogger board...yeah...don't bother me kid, I get "grown up" things to
> do.

Aww, shame that photo was taken several years ago - could've been an even
bigger eye opener for you. Still, I am 16 and I have ripped every last
piece of proof out of every incredulous web design theory you've
presented me with. Feels good huh?

> Oh and before that pedophile Stevie jumps in tryin to slurp yer virgin
> ass and steal yer black cherry

I'm sure he wasn't even thinking like that - very strange the graphic
detail you provided, however.

> no, I'm not contradicting what I said
> about age in that other post

Sorry which post? Please provide a quote.

> it's just I'm drawing the line at fuckin
> puberty.

Did you never reach it?

> If yer gawd damn balls haven't even dropped I don't wanna be
> hearing about your "incredible insights" (read incredible stupidity)
> about the world of web development.

Because you didn't make the grade and never comprehended web design as
well as someone you're junior?


- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPktkA9dCbrNdDMRAoy6AJ4gFsLd1DVjHK0m0SLV44 zxYEl+IQCePddV
pEjuH/gSzHAVL2NNDV881qA=
=lCwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Brendan Gillatt" <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote
in message news:ht6dnc9RyuXOa5HanZ2dnUVZ8qLinZ2d@pipex.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
>>> news:0ipmg31nlu5cdbbvavrgad5ub04kai8mk8@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:30:18 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> news:jt1lg396pru74b0jh2affmrt5dut9vk3tr@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:35:27 +0100, Brendan Gillatt
>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote:
>>>> You're still a r-tard, Stupid. For all you know all those hits
>>>> happened in the same hour on the same day and the rest of the time it
>>>> got zero hits...yer kinda fuckwitted and stupid like that, huh?
>>> oh no, no...i can say with statistical certainty of 98% that if 500K
>>> hits is
>>> all you get per month, they will NOT be happening all at once...even
>>> within
>>> the same hour.
>>
>> Are you sure, Stupid? Cause the little boy you've been molesting up
>> the ass with your tongue was able to formulate a scenario in which it
>> was more than probable to get an extremely high number of hits in a
>> very short time frame.
>
> He told you that you'd get 500,000 hits in an hour?

apparently it was to hard for him to see 'NOT' and comprehend the rest of
what preceded and followed. ;^)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> did you see the physical description he gives himself on myspace? 5'11 /
>> atheletic. did you see his mug right above the description? how hard did you
>> laugh? he obviously is consistently overstating or out-and-out lying about
>> everything.
>
> Why don't you come the fuck on over and see how athletic I am, Junior,
> my address isn't exactly some big sekrat. I mean if you're *SO* sure
> of yourself and if you think you're Gods gift to female attraction,
> hell, you should have *NO* problem at all stepin it the fuck
> up...well, unless of course you look like your little friend Brendan:
> http://fc02.deviantart.com/fs7/i/200...dangillatt.jpg

There's no point in calling me little - It appears I am mentally more
mature than you and I'm actually 2 inches taller than what you faked your
myspace height as ;]

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDPw3kA9dCbrNdDMRAsTxAJ4vN4TXCHZWH7Rc9o3J8W G5ou9gQQCfZ5Eb
gGQOBxge2MfV/GOGGrdFU+E=
=Q9dP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:58:53 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:28:26 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:12:43 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Brendan Gillatt"
>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.u k> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:cJ6dnZPFErQQAJbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the
>>>>>>> definition of assembly language? Decided that Steve and I do in
>>>>>>> fact know a damn lot more than you when it comes to web-design?
>>>>>> he'll never say that. he usually just leaves a post dead when
>>>>>> really embarrassed, or the more it becomes obvious that he's a
>>>>>> tard, he'll throw bigger and bigger tantrums, snip your points
>>>>>> thinking that out-of-site is out-of-mind, or he makes it obvious
>>>>>> that he's ignoring your point by cutting it off with '<cock
>>>>>> slap>'...which i've started to do in turn with most of his
>>>>>> rantings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the guy's a duche with no personal life. he's piss about that so he
>>>>>> vents here. sad really.
>>>>> Hey Steve, at the end of the day...I have websites...
>>>> A fan site about the Care Bears?
>>> One that likely generates more money in a month that your stupid ass
>>> makes in a year in "allowance" money from yer idiot parents.
>> LOL
>>
>> My "idiot" parents thought enough to leave me with enough that I don't think
>> my kids will even have to worry about making ends meet.
>
> Oh so you're just moochin off mom and dad, eh? LOL, no wonder you're
> so pathetic, you have no idea at all what it's like to EARN a living.

Like $25 dollars / week from adsense?

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDP0QkA9dCbrNdDMRAiITAKCFPmbC4773mrhGOp4+JS lDujl5LgCgusWm
2CrTvZSDqB0y+XkX5f9IQdo=
=sf1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:15:40 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote:
>
>> lol. as soon as he mentioned that, i did the math in my *head* and
>> guestimated (rounding and such) 7 hits per second. fact is, dilweed simply
>> makes up shit
>
> *Hatter leans back and gets caught with the happy lamp.*

oh dear

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?...rch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHDP2QkA9dCbrNdDMRAgM9AKC9ahK9YUVBMN1WxcuHlM DmgAoYRQCfdvXy
HZmWJqNREV7Uj/ZEjsqXY+U=
=y6xM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----