PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Diriger une société d'hébergement > alt.internet.seo > will this consider as spamming / cloaking?
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics.

will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 26/10/2007, 16h59   #1
ultrakit
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.

I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
until the link has been click.

My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
spamming / cloaking?

#nav { color: #0000; }
#nav li { display: inline; }
#container { height: 300px; overflow: hidden; }
.content { height: 300px;}

<ul id="nav">
<li><a href="#page1">Page 1</a></li>
<li><a href="#page2">Page 2 </a></li>
<li><a href="#page3">Page 3</a></li>
</ul>

<div id="container">

<div class="content">
<a name="page1"></a>
<p>Page 1 description<a href="http://www.xxx.com/page1.html">learn
more</a></p>
</div>

<div class="content">
<a name="page2"></a>
<p>Page 2 description<a href="http://www.xxx.com/page2.html">learn
more</a></p>
</div>

<div class="content">
<a name="page3"></a>
<p>Page 3 description<a href="http://www.xxx.com/page3.html">learn
more</a></p>
</div>

</div>

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 17h06   #2
Tonnie Lubbers
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

ultrakit schreef:
> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>
> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
> until the link has been click.
>
> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
> spamming / cloaking?


[snip code]

One simple answer: YES


--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 18h08   #3
T.J.
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?


"Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
> ultrakit schreef:
>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>
>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>> until the link has been click.
>>
>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>> spamming / cloaking?

>
> [snip code]
>
> One simple answer: YES
>
>


http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 19h08   #4
Tonnie Lubbers
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

T.J. schreef:
> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
> news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
>> ultrakit schreef:
>>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
>>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>>> until the link has been click.
>>>
>>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>>> spamming / cloaking?

>> [snip code]
>>
>> One simple answer: YES
>>
>>

>
> http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html


Quality guidelines - basic principles

* Make pages for users, not for search engines.

--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 19h17   #5
T.J.
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?


"Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:V2qUi.7196$Hv4.5540@amstwist00...
> T.J. schreef:
>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>> news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
>>> ultrakit schreef:
>>>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>>>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
>>>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>>>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>>>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>>>> until the link has been click.
>>>>
>>>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>>>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>>>> spamming / cloaking?
>>> [snip code]
>>>
>>> One simple answer: YES
>>>
>>>

>>
>> http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html

>
> Quality guidelines - basic principles
>
> * Make pages for users, not for search engines.
>


Does that mean yes or no?


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 19h33   #6
Tonnie Lubbers
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

T.J. schreef:
> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
> news:V2qUi.7196$Hv4.5540@amstwist00...
>> T.J. schreef:
>>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>>> news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
>>>> ultrakit schreef:
>>>>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>>>>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My first
>>>>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>>>>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>>>>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>>>>> until the link has been click.
>>>>>
>>>>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>>>>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>>>>> spamming / cloaking?
>>>> [snip code]
>>>>
>>>> One simple answer: YES
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html

>> Quality guidelines - basic principles
>>
>> * Make pages for users, not for search engines.
>>

>
> Does that mean yes or no?


What do you think?

The pages OP wants to make are made to serve the engines, because his
client wants a splash page with no other content on it than a link.


--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 19h40   #7
T.J.
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?


"Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:fqqUi.7201$Hv4.5846@amstwist00...
> T.J. schreef:
>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>> news:V2qUi.7196$Hv4.5540@amstwist00...
>>> T.J. schreef:
>>>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>>>> news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
>>>>> ultrakit schreef:
>>>>>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>>>>>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>>>>>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>>>>>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>>>>>> until the link has been click.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>>>>>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>>>>>> spamming / cloaking?
>>>>> [snip code]
>>>>>
>>>>> One simple answer: YES
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html
>>> Quality guidelines - basic principles
>>>
>>> * Make pages for users, not for search engines.
>>>

>>
>> Does that mean yes or no?

>
> What do you think?
>
> The pages OP wants to make are made to serve the engines, because his
> client wants a splash page with no other content on it than a link.
>
>


Sorry, I'm not arguing, just want to know your views.

Quote from the OP,

"My first thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
the page."

My example seems to provide a pretty legitimate way of achieving this.
As long as it isn't just keyword stuffed and there to trick the engines
why would Google object?

Do you think my page is against the guidelines?


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 26/10/2007, 20h42   #8
Tonnie Lubbers
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

T.J. schreef:
> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
> news:fqqUi.7201$Hv4.5846@amstwist00...
>> T.J. schreef:
>>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>>> news:V2qUi.7196$Hv4.5540@amstwist00...
>>>> T.J. schreef:
>>>>> "Tonnie Lubbers" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jgoUi.7171$Hv4.3372@amstwist00...
>>>>>> ultrakit schreef:
>>>>>>> Hi, I'm a new SEO learner, any replies are greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a client who INSIST a splash page with only 3 links. My worry
>>>>>>> is that SE will not pick up the site as there is no content. My
>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>> thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
>>>>>>> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
>>>>>>> the page. Client finally agrees but need to content to be hidden
>>>>>>> until the link has been click.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My solution is to have multi content block but hide them. Code as
>>>>>>> follow but I'm afraid since the text is hidden, it's consider as
>>>>>>> spamming / cloaking?
>>>>>> [snip code]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One simple answer: YES
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory....es/hidden.html
>>>> Quality guidelines - basic principles
>>>>
>>>> * Make pages for users, not for search engines.
>>>>
>>> Does that mean yes or no?

>> What do you think?
>>
>> The pages OP wants to make are made to serve the engines, because his
>> client wants a splash page with no other content on it than a link.
>>
>>

>
> Sorry, I'm not arguing, just want to know your views.


NP. Just wanted to know for sure what you think. English aint my native
language so i have to ask to be sure or understand.

> Quote from the OP,
>
> "My first thought is to have at least a 1 line description for each page so
> there are text and visitor will have a sense of what they will get on
> the page."
>
> My example seems to provide a pretty legitimate way of achieving this.
> As long as it isn't just keyword stuffed and there to trick the engines
> why would Google object?
>
> Do you think my page is against the guidelines?


If seen as in 'black' and 'white', then yes it is.

If one would like to stretch it a little, it could be on the safe side.
But then again there is that 'could be'.

--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/10/2007, 18h14   #9
ultrakit
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

I totally agree on the "make site for user not for search engine".
And what does user want?

I've finally convinced my client to have the 1 line descriptions for
each page ALL displaying. We all want to know what we will be getting
right from step 1 right? This gotta be the solution that makes
everyone happy.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/10/2007, 18h24   #10
Tonnie Lubbers
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

ultrakit schreef:
> I totally agree on the "make site for user not for search engine".
> And what does user want?
>
> I've finally convinced my client to have the 1 line descriptions for
> each page ALL displaying. We all want to know what we will be getting
> right from step 1 right? This gotta be the solution that makes
> everyone happy.


Bravo.



--
Webdesign: http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/
Korte handleiding zoekmachine optimalisatie / gevonden worden:
http://vision2form.nl/webontwerp/gevonden-worden.html
Lifestyle - wonen reizen en genieten : http://vision4living.com
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 27/10/2007, 18h52   #11
The Gobbling Goblin
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: will this consider as spamming / cloaking?

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:14:58 -0000, ultrakit <ultrakit@gmail.com>
wrote:

>I totally agree on the "make site for user not for search engine".
>And what does user want?
>
>I've finally convinced my client to have the 1 line descriptions for
>each page ALL displaying. We all want to know what we will be getting
>right from step 1 right? This gotta be the solution that makes
>everyone happy.


And while you are at it, convince him NOT to have a splash screen.
So 1984 / waste of time / totally pointless to everyone / wastes b/w /
user has to click more times / drives people away / etc etc

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 10h35.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,23331 seconds with 19 queries