|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Hi,
Has anyone checked if there's a connection between how much you use Google AdWords and the position on Google you get for the site? Google won't reveal how the ranking works and I can imagine that they give a few extra credits to sites which improve their cash flow. Yes, it's a bit of a conspiracy, but they're in it for the money and it would be naive to think anything else. So, what do you say? Mike |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
mh" <twat@noreply-nospam.com> wrote ...
> Has anyone checked if there's a connection between how much you use > Google AdWords and the position on Google you get for the site? > Google won't reveal how the ranking works and I can imagine that they > give a few extra credits to sites which improve their cash flow. > Yes, it's a bit of a conspiracy, but they're in it for the money and it > would be naive to think anything else. Tosh. If Google were that desperate for a few pennies, they'd favor the *publishers* doing best, as that would expose them to even more activity. But don't tell me - your cousin was on the Grassy Knoll when Marilyn Monroe was murdered in the Fake Moon Landings. Keep on truckin' - and you'll die lonely. Open your eyes and smell the coffee - it's time to grow up. -- Andrew http://www.seo2seo.com/ http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/ First things first - but not necessarily in that order. The video that makes YouTube worthwhile: Charlie The Unicorn - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5im0Ssyyus |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
They are adamant that they are blind to both adsense and adwords, when
ranking websites. i |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Ignoramus27577" <ignoramus27577@NOSPAM.27577.invalid> wrote in message news:RoidnQLnHboyZ4janZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@giganews.com ... > They are adamant that they are blind to both adsense and adwords, when > ranking websites. > > i I got rid of it months ago, it was just looking to spammy to me. Sure I miss my $100 check every two or three months but my driveway sealing business site remains at the top for all my key words. Yes it is a small service industry but with the of BB, Jez and a few others around here my serps remain at the top or at least in the top 10. When I go to a new site and see all that google crap on both sides with a logo in the middle I'm out of there. I don't even bother to scroll down most of the time. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:17:58 GMT, "Andrew Heenan" <andrew3@heenan.net>
wrote: >mh" <twat@noreply-nospam.com> wrote ... >> Has anyone checked if there's a connection between how much you use >> Google AdWords and the position on Google you get for the site? >> Google won't reveal how the ranking works and I can imagine that they >> give a few extra credits to sites which improve their cash flow. >> Yes, it's a bit of a conspiracy, but they're in it for the money and it >> would be naive to think anything else. > >Tosh. > >If Google were that desperate for a few pennies, they'd favor the >*publishers* doing best, as that would expose them to even more activity. > >But don't tell me - your cousin was on the Grassy Knoll when Marilyn Monroe >was murdered in the Fake Moon Landings. > >Keep on truckin' - and you'll die lonely. >Open your eyes and smell the coffee - it's time to grow up. Huh? BB -- http://www.fat-odin.com/ http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:06:07 -0500, Ignoramus27577
<ignoramus27577@NOSPAM.27577.invalid> wrote: >They are adamant that they are blind to both adsense and adwords, when >ranking websites. > >i Also to paid links :-( BB -- http://www.fat-odin.com/ http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 2007-10-17, John <jploss@swbell.net> wrote:
> > "Ignoramus27577" <ignoramus27577@NOSPAM.27577.invalid> wrote in message > news:RoidnQLnHboyZ4janZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@giganews.com ... >> They are adamant that they are blind to both adsense and adwords, when >> ranking websites. >> >> i > > I got rid of it months ago, it was just looking to spammy to me. I know what you mean. Changing colors might have made it less spammy looking. > Sure I miss my $100 check every two or three months but my driveway > sealing business site remains at the top for all my key words. Yes > it is a small service industry but with the of BB, Jez and a > few others around here my serps remain at the top or at least in the > top 10. When I go to a new site and see all that google crap on both > sides with a logo in the middle I'm out of there. I don't even > bother to scroll down most of the time. It is a matter of 2 orders of magnitude more money for me, no way I could give it up. i |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:45:53 -0500, "John" <jploss@swbell.net> wrote:
> >"Ignoramus27577" <ignoramus27577@NOSPAM.27577.invalid> wrote in message >news:RoidnQLnHboyZ4janZ2dnUVZ_hzinZ2d@giganews.co m... >> They are adamant that they are blind to both adsense and adwords, when >> ranking websites. >> >> i > >I got rid of it months ago, it was just looking to spammy to me. Sure I miss >my $100 check every two or three months but my driveway sealing business >site remains at the top for all my key words. Yes it is a small service >industry but with the of BB, Jez and a few others around here my serps >remain at the top or at least in the top 10. When I go to a new site and see >all that google crap on both sides with a logo in the middle I'm out of >there. I don't even bother to scroll down most of the time. Some sites that are largely informational are ed to survive by their adsense revenue, so if it's such a site I wouldn't be too quick to judge. BB -- http://www.fat-odin.com/ http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|