|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
I'm reading that some people are saying it and a client complains that
theirs has gone down... but I put that down to the ongoing downwards revision of PR itself and that's all I've seen of anything. Anyone noticed anything? BB -- http://www.fat-odin.com/ http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Big Bill wrote:
> Anyone noticed anything? > Nope |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:05:24 GMT, Big Bill <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote:
>I'm reading that some people are saying it and a client complains that >theirs has gone down... but I put that down to the ongoing downwards >revision of PR itself and that's all I've seen of anything. >Anyone noticed anything? > >BB No change here Bill. Neither up or down. There are a number of reasons why a site can drop. Anything from a shift in PR boundaries, to a site no longer existing that linked to you. plh paul -- http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-208.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-307.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/necklace-202.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> I'm reading that some people are saying it and a client complains that
> theirs has gone down... but I put that down to the ongoing downwards > revision of PR itself and that's all I've seen of anything. > Anyone noticed anything? Other than PageRank hardly matters these days ...? Yes - over on Google groups a couple of dozen have complained about drops of two or three. All say it's made no difference to SERPs ranking. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:04:53 -0700, Phil Payne
<phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote: >> I'm reading that some people are saying it and a client complains that >> theirs has gone down... but I put that down to the ongoing downwards >> revision of PR itself and that's all I've seen of anything. >> Anyone noticed anything? > >Other than PageRank hardly matters these days ...? > >Yes - over on Google groups a couple of dozen have complained about >drops of two or three. All say it's made no difference to SERPs >ranking. Which points to its being a downwards revision of the value of PR, something that seems to exist increasingly independent of any real-world application. BB -- http://www.fat-odin.com/ http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Big Bill wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:04:53 -0700, Phil Payne > <phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote: > >>> I'm reading that some people are saying it and a client complains that >>> theirs has gone down... but I put that down to the ongoing downwards >>> revision of PR itself and that's all I've seen of anything. >>> Anyone noticed anything? >> Other than PageRank hardly matters these days ...? >> >> Yes - over on Google groups a couple of dozen have complained about >> drops of two or three. All say it's made no difference to SERPs >> ranking. > > Which points to its being a downwards revision of the value of PR, > something that seems to exist increasingly independent of any > real-world application. > > BB There is speculation that link sellers are being penalised by a PR drop od one or two places and that the PR update for everyone else will soon follow. Whatever, it's certainly the most odd PR update / non PR update I have ever seen. |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|