Google has phased out pagerank and is no longer using it and there will be no more updates of pagerank. Cutt's advice for webmasters and seo's is to create a massive amount of internal pages for your site (in the thousands to millions) and link farm them all together. That is how to get a site ranked high up now in google. Content means text and it only takes about a simple small paragraph of text on all the millions of internal pages to accomplish this. The text doesn't have to be relevant and can be about anything.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

> Google has phased out pagerank and is no longer using it and there will be no more updates of pagerank. Cutt's advice for webmasters and seo's is to create a massive amount of internal pages for your site (in the thousands to millions) and link farm them all together. That is how to get a site ranked high up now in google. Content means text and it only takes about a simple small paragraph of text on all the millions of internal pages to accomplish this. The text doesn't have to be relevant and can be about anything.

A link would be useful.

"Phil Payne" wrote ...
>> Google has phased out pagerank and is no longer using it and there will
>> be no more updates of pagerank. Cutt's advice for webmasters and seo's is
>> to create a massive amount of internal pages for your site (in the
>> thousands to millions) and link farm them all together. That is how to
>> get a site ranked high up now in google. Content means text and it only
>> takes about a simple small paragraph of text on all the millions of
>> internal pages to accomplish this. The text doesn't have to be relevant
>> and can be about anything.
>
> A link would be useful.
>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiction

)
--

Andrew

On Oct 1, 10:30 am, "Andrew Heenan" <andr...@heenan.net> wrote:
> "Phil Payne" wrote ...
>
> >> Google has phased out pagerank and is no longer using it and there will
> >> be no more updates of pagerank. Cutt's advice for webmasters and seo's is
> >> to create a massive amount of internal pages for your site (in the
> >> thousands to millions) and link farm them all together. That is how to
> >> get a site ranked high up now in google. Content means text and it only
> >> takes about a simple small paragraph of text on all the millions of
> >> internal pages to accomplish this. The text doesn't have to be relevant
> >> and can be about anything.
>
> > A link would be useful.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiction
>
> )
> --
>
> Andrew

thats insane. most web design firms quote based on numbers of pages
created and small business cant create 1000000 page sites (theres not
that much to talk about) and the cost to design and maintain would be
extortionate!

mark
www.neue.co.uk / www.ihype.co.uk

To say that google will shift from PR/links to content focus is a
pretty bold statement. It is someone true now but do you have any
backup or reference, I looked on Matt's blog and there was not
reference to this.

<Markukasia@gmail.com> wrote ...
> To say that google will shift from PR/links to content focus is a
> pretty bold statement. It is someone true now but do you have any
> backup or reference, I looked on Matt's blog and there was not
> reference to this.

F-I-C-T-I-O-N

Markukasia@gmail.com wrote:
>
> To say that google will shift from PR/links to content focus is a
> pretty bold statement. It is someone true now but do you have any
> backup or reference, I looked on Matt's blog and there was not
> reference to this.
>
There is absoluteley no way that Google or any search engine can rate or
measure content, it's an impossibility! The closest any search engine or
directory came to doing that was with DMOZ (Open Directory Project)
which uses human editors to rate and check sites rather than bots. Dmoz
was a failure simply due to the fact that:

1. There are way too many sites on the web for humans to handle.
2. Humans are by nature selfish and greedy and the editors volenteer so
they can their own sites.
3. Rating content is relative since it's only one person's opinion,
their personal likes and dislikes.

For those 3 reasons, and there may be more, it's impossible to do search
ranking by content of a site. By content we're talking about the text on
the page not html coding tricks.

The only way search ranking can be done is through either keywords or
link popularity as a starting place and then the bots can be programmed
to pick up or avoid certain things and hope that everything comes out
alright.
Unfortunetely all the millions of spammed sites on the web have thrown a
monkey wrench into the works and so current day search ranking methods
really don't work right. The newer software programs google has employed
correct and deal with some facets of spam sites but at the same
time they create new problems that didn't exist before that throw search
off. They are still light years behind the spammers and have tons of
catching up to do. So far the spammers are winning big time. Their best
technique they employ is using blogs and other dynamic xml type pages at
their sites and they create thousands of pages at other sites they own
which use dynamic blog type pages and have links on them to their real
target sites. In other words they create their own link popularity and
successfully manipulate google. I think google, and yahoo too, are the
most manipulated search engines in the web's history.

> There is absoluteley no way that Google or any search engine can rate or
> measure content, it's an impossibility!

You're not up to speed on current technology.

> Okay then tell me how they are able to have their bots read and
> understand content?

It's been done for years and it gets better all the time. See:

http://prnewswire.mediaroom.com/inde...eases&item=169

At the heart of that system is a tool that "reads" the media and can
assess whether a particular story has a positive or negative tone
concerning a customer. You might also look at Google News in detail -
it's obvious that many of its choices are not simply keyword driven.