PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Diriger une société d'hébergement > alt.internet.seo > duplicate content ?1234
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics.

duplicate content ?1234

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 23/09/2007, 11h12   #1
vw86trq1jhjukgfd
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut duplicate content ?1234

When I post a link to my web site from a discussion forum or blog comment I
add a ?<idnumber> argument to the url (ie http:// www.mysite
..com/index.html?1234 . This lets me see how the link originated when I check
my site meter statistics.

I just noticed that google picks up these links and if you search on google
and my site comes up the link on the google search results can be the same
link with the ?1234 is used. So I am wondering will this decrease my google
ranking because of duplicate url's with the same content?


Thanks


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 23/09/2007, 15h36   #2
Andrew Heenan
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: duplicate content ?1234

"vw86trq1jhjukgfd" wrote ...
> I just noticed that google picks up these links and if you search on
> google and my site comes up the link on the google search results can be
> the same link with the ?1234 is used. So I am wondering will this decrease
> my google ranking because of duplicate url's with the same content?


It will almost certainly have an effect, as Google is very sensitive to
canonicalization issues, and usually recognizes 'new URLs' as 'new pages'.

At worst, however, these links you're dropping will add nothing.

But then, forum link dropping is one of the most futile ways on the planet
for improving ranking, so I doubt you need worry.

The benefit of the referrals - and knowing where they come from - is
probably of greater value.
--

Andrew
http://www.seo2seo.com/
http://www.sick-site-syndrome.com/
First things first - but not necessarily in that order.


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 24/09/2007, 05h15   #3
Roy Schestowitz
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: duplicate content ?1234

____/ Andrew Heenan on Sunday 23 September 2007 15:36 : \____

> "vw86trq1jhjukgfd" wrote ...
>> I just noticed that google picks up these links and if you search on
>> google and my site comes up the link on the google search results can be
>> the same link with the ?1234 is used. So I am wondering will this decrease
>> my google ranking because of duplicate url's with the same content?

>
> It will almost certainly have an effect, as Google is very sensitive to
> canonicalization issues, and usually recognizes 'new URLs' as 'new pages'.
>
> At worst, however, these links you're dropping will add nothing.
>
> But then, forum link dropping is one of the most futile ways on the planet
> for improving ranking, so I doubt you need worry.


rel=nofollowing them seems to be the more popular step. but not just because of
SEO, but also because it deters spammers.

> The benefit of the referrals - and knowing where they come from - is
> probably of greater value.


--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1510068k total, 333276k used, 1176792k free, 94312k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 24/09/2007, 06h14   #4
Big Bill
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: duplicate content ?1234

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:36:12 GMT, "Andrew Heenan" <andrew3@heenan.net>
wrote:

>"vw86trq1jhjukgfd" wrote ...
>> I just noticed that google picks up these links and if you search on
>> google and my site comes up the link on the google search results can be
>> the same link with the ?1234 is used. So I am wondering will this decrease
>> my google ranking because of duplicate url's with the same content?

>
>It will almost certainly have an effect, as Google is very sensitive to
>canonicalization issues, and usually recognizes 'new URLs' as 'new pages'.
>
>At worst, however, these links you're dropping will add nothing.
>
>But then, forum link dropping is one of the most futile ways on the planet
>for improving ranking,


Says who and on what basis?

BB
--

http://www.fat-odin.com/
http://www.kruse.co.uk/close-ended-questions.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-software-review.htm
  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 22h43.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,16670 seconds with 12 queries