|
| PORTAIL | ANNUAIRE | ARTICLES | COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS | DEVIS | FORUMS | RÉDUCTEUR D'URL |
|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
02/03/2007, 14h19
|
#1 |
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Google Images knackered ?
Hi all
I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. plh paul -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-2.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
02/03/2007, 14h27
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote:
> Hi all > I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 > images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. > No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. i |
|
|
|
02/03/2007, 14h31
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:27:51 -0600, Ignoramus16069
<ignoramus16069@NOSPAM.16069.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote: >> Hi all >> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. > >If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my >site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. > >i No need. I live above a huge one. -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-2.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
02/03/2007, 14h42
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
Paul B wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:27:51 -0600, Ignoramus16069 > <ignoramus16069@NOSPAM.16069.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote: >>> Hi all >>> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >> If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my >> site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. >> >> i > > No need. I live above a huge one. An easy to find one? |
|
|
|
02/03/2007, 14h43
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:42:34 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote:
> > >Paul B wrote: >> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:27:51 -0600, Ignoramus16069 >> <ignoramus16069@NOSPAM.16069.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all >>>> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>>> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>>> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >>> If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my >>> site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. >>> >>> i >> >> No need. I live above a huge one. > >An easy to find one? Image or clit ? Image wise, I have looked on MSN and Yahoo, and almost disappeared from them as well  Clit wise, he will be a dead clit if he carries on. -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-2.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
02/03/2007, 15h05
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
Paul B wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:42:34 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote: > >> >> Paul B wrote: >>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:27:51 -0600, Ignoramus16069 >>> <ignoramus16069@NOSPAM.16069.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all >>>>> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>>>> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>>>> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >>>> If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my >>>> site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. >>>> >>>> i >>> No need. I live above a huge one. >> An easy to find one? > > Image or clit ? > > Image wise, I have looked on MSN and Yahoo, and almost disappeared > from them as well > > Clit wise, he will be a dead clit if he carries on. Yeah, it does look like something is up with the image search for on google. I just checked the UK only image search and there was no images at all found for the search. Hopefully your images (and traffic) will return. |
|
|
|
02/03/2007, 15h14
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:05:01 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote:
> > >Paul B wrote: >> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:42:34 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Paul B wrote: >>>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:27:51 -0600, Ignoramus16069 >>>> <ignoramus16069@NOSPAM.16069.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:19:03 +0000, Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all >>>>>> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>>>>> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>>>>> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >>>>> If you had any visitors for "clitoris", they probably moved to my >>>>> site, which is #1 and #2 for clitoris. >>>>> >>>>> i >>>> No need. I live above a huge one. >>> An easy to find one? >> >> Image or clit ? >> >> Image wise, I have looked on MSN and Yahoo, and almost disappeared >> from them as well >> >> Clit wise, he will be a dead clit if he carries on. > >Yeah, it does look like something is up with the image search for on >google. I just checked the UK only image search and there was no images >at all found for the search. > >Hopefully your images (and traffic) will return. I don't think it is just with google as yahoo and msn are the same. The HC site is okay, but not the FP one. At least I know why there has been a drop off in traffic. Now I have to find out why they have been dropped. Quite worrying. plh Paul -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-2.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
04/03/2007, 19h45
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
Paul B wrote:
> Hi all > I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 > images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. > No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. > > plh > paul > Paul, It looks like there is at least one other person affected by image SERP loss. http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=259280 |
|
|
|
04/03/2007, 19h55
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote:
>Paul B wrote: > >> Hi all >> I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >> images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >> No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >> >> plh >> paul >> > > >Paul, > >It looks like there is at least one other person affected by image SERP >loss. > >http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=259280 Thanks for the HU jez. Have a look at this also : http://images.google.com/images?svnu...firstpeople.us "Supposed" to be my site. Some of those images are mine, but don't show my site. Yesterday, they were showing another set of pics instead. All mine, but another site. Straaaaaaaaange. plh Paul -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-6.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
04/03/2007, 19h58
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
Paul B wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote: > > >>Paul B wrote: >> >> >>>Hi all >>>I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>>images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>>No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >>> >>>plh >>>paul >>> >> >> >>Paul, >> >>It looks like there is at least one other person affected by image SERP >>loss. >> >>http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=259280 > > > Thanks for the HU jez. > > Have a look at this also : > http://images.google.com/images?svnu...firstpeople.us > "Supposed" to be my site. Some of those images are mine, but don't > show my site. > Yesterday, they were showing another set of pics instead. All mine, > but another site. Straaaaaaaaange. > plh > Paul > That's odd. Are they your copyright images? |
|
|
|
04/03/2007, 20h40
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Re: Google Images knackered ?
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:58:13 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote:
>Paul B wrote: > >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:45:17 +0000, Jez <j.ez@virgin.net> wrote: >> >> >>>Paul B wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi all >>>>I just checked on google images, and where I once had around 10000 >>>>images on there, there are now 7, and not my site either. >>>>No wonder why I dropped from 8000 visitors a day to around 3000. >>>> >>>>plh >>>>paul >>>> >>> >>> >>>Paul, >>> >>>It looks like there is at least one other person affected by image SERP >>>loss. >>> >>>http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=259280 >> >> >> Thanks for the HU jez. >> >> Have a look at this also : >> http://images.google.com/images?svnu...firstpeople.us >> "Supposed" to be my site. Some of those images are mine, but don't >> show my site. >> Yesterday, they were showing another set of pics instead. All mine, >> but another site. Straaaaaaaaange. >> plh >> Paul >> > >That's odd. Are they your copyright images? Some I made, some are copyrighted to artists. -- http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-1.html http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Pi...ictures-6.html http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...welry-101.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|
