Hi,
you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
utility I have realized.
For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
also the number of indexed pages
I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
Google.
And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
it on-line.
P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
give something to GreenPeace.
Thanks and you again excuse.

The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/

On 20 Feb 2007 09:41:17 -0800, pinopaolo@spataro.info wrote:

>Hi,
>you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
>utility I have realized.
>For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
>also the number of indexed pages
>I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
>the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
>Google.
>And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
>it on-line.
>P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
>give something to GreenPeace.
>Thanks and you again excuse.
>
>The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/

I think this is a very good effort, but it's a little out of date now.
Google webmaster tools give more accurate counts of backlinks, for
example. But well done anyway.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-mark...l-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm

<pinopaolo@spataro.info> wrote in message
news:1171993277.112444.158870@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi,
> you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
> utility I have realized.
> For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
> also the number of indexed pages
> I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
> the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
> Google.
> And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
> it on-line.
> P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
> give something to GreenPeace.
> Thanks and you again excuse.
>
> The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/


Very, very nice. Thanks! :-)

"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dvmmt21quisu2kfb7aop0a7qtumankvndd@4ax.com...
> On 20 Feb 2007 09:41:17 -0800, pinopaolo@spataro.info wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
>>utility I have realized.
>>For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
>>also the number of indexed pages
>>I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
>>the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
>>Google.
>>And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
>>it on-line.
>>P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
>>give something to GreenPeace.
>>Thanks and you again excuse.
>>
>>The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/
>
> I think this is a very good effort, but it's a little out of date now.
> Google webmaster tools give more accurate counts of backlinks, for
> example. But well done anyway.
>
> BB

True, but still useful for those who don't bother with the webmaster tools.

cheers ~
D.

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:05:21 GMT, "Denise" <dionyza@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:dvmmt21quisu2kfb7aop0a7qtumankvndd@4ax.com.. .
>> On 20 Feb 2007 09:41:17 -0800, pinopaolo@spataro.info wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
>>>utility I have realized.
>>>For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
>>>also the number of indexed pages
>>>I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
>>>the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
>>>Google.
>>>And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
>>>it on-line.
>>>P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
>>>give something to GreenPeace.
>>>Thanks and you again excuse.
>>>
>>>The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/
>>
>> I think this is a very good effort, but it's a little out of date now.
>> Google webmaster tools give more accurate counts of backlinks, for
>> example. But well done anyway.
>>
>> BB
>
>True, but still useful for those who don't bother with the webmaster tools.
>
>cheers ~
>D.

For those who don't bother to make an accurate check? Why would they
bother to make that?

BB (packing furiously...)
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-mark...l-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm

"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
news:15unt2pgnb8trfum5jtooa3fso1il0e3o0@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:05:21 GMT, "Denise" <dionyza@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:dvmmt21quisu2kfb7aop0a7qtumankvndd@4ax.com. ..
>>> On 20 Feb 2007 09:41:17 -0800, pinopaolo@spataro.info wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
>>>>utility I have realized.
>>>>For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
>>>>also the number of indexed pages
>>>>I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
>>>>the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
>>>>Google.
>>>>And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
>>>>it on-line.
>>>>P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
>>>>give something to GreenPeace.
>>>>Thanks and you again excuse.
>>>>
>>>>The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/
>>>
>>> I think this is a very good effort, but it's a little out of date now.
>>> Google webmaster tools give more accurate counts of backlinks, for
>>> example. But well done anyway.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>True, but still useful for those who don't bother with the webmaster
>>tools.
>>
>>cheers ~
>>D.
>
> For those who don't bother to make an accurate check? Why would they
> bother to make that?
>
> BB (packing furiously...)

I am sorry, but sites that do not like me go backward to the previous site I
was on annoys me. I usually never go back to the site. I have a previous
page up usually also and I go back to it. It doesn't stop me though from
going back to my page so why people do it is beyond me, it is just annoying
to getting back.

Stacey
--
Irish Stuff - Saint Patrick's Day Decorations
http://irish-stuff.net/
Easter Stuff - Decorations - Egg Tips
http://easter-stuff.net/

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:13:12 +0100, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:15unt2pgnb8trfum5jtooa3fso1il0e3o0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:05:21 GMT, "Denise" <dionyza@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Big Bill" <bill@kruse.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>news:dvmmt21quisu2kfb7aop0a7qtumankvndd@4ax.com ...
>>>> On 20 Feb 2007 09:41:17 -0800, pinopaolo@spataro.info wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>you excuse for the post but I would like to signal a little free
>>>>>utility I have realized.
>>>>>For varied time I used checkpagerank.com; then as I wished to know
>>>>>also the number of indexed pages
>>>>>I have thought I would realize this little free utility which measures
>>>>>the Pagerank, the Backlinks and the number of pages indexed by
>>>>>Google.
>>>>>And seen that other could be useful also to someone I have published
>>>>>it on-line.
>>>>>P.S. if it should come back for you useful and thought I am right, you
>>>>>give something to GreenPeace.
>>>>>Thanks and you again excuse.
>>>>>
>>>>>The link: http://www.googleparameters.com/
>>>>
>>>> I think this is a very good effort, but it's a little out of date now.
>>>> Google webmaster tools give more accurate counts of backlinks, for
>>>> example. But well done anyway.
>>>>
>>>> BB
>>>
>>>True, but still useful for those who don't bother with the webmaster
>>>tools.
>>>
>>>cheers ~
>>>D.
>>
>> For those who don't bother to make an accurate check? Why would they
>> bother to make that?
>>
>> BB (packing furiously...)
>
>I am sorry, but sites that do not like me go backward to the previous site I
>was on annoys me. I usually never go back to the site. I have a previous
>page up usually also and I go back to it. It doesn't stop me though from
>going back to my page so why people do it is beyond me, it is just annoying
>to getting back.
>
>Stacey

Uh... yeah. Of course.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-mark...l-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm