I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.

My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in
Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it said
that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an
hour.

[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]

I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability. I
have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I
don't want to make the same mistake again.

*Please PM me if you can .*


--
Lampspecs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampspecs's Profile: http://techiegroups.com/member.php?userid=872
View this thread: http://www.techiegroups.com/showthread.php?t=121529

"Lampspecs" <Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
message news:Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
>
> I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
> whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
> would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.

Why the UK? <joke>Does the internet work differently there? I know for BB at
times it does.:-)</joke>

It shouldn't matter where the person is at.:-)

> My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
> old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
> this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
> by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in
> Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
> process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it said
> that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an
> hour.
>
> [image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]

It isn't a ban. You still have 25 pages(but not really indexed).
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...pecs%2eco%2euk
That means they know of the site but will probably not list the pages in the
index when a search query is made except for the very small niche SERPs and
probably not even them.

I know what the problem is. Did your site go into expired status? It
probably did since the PR is 0. Don't expect to see anything for about
another 2 months. It takes about 6 months for these sites which are kind of
on hold status. There is nothing you can do. While you are waiting just try
and gain more quality links. I have been through it myself. It is like
Google holds out to make sure this website won't change into something other
than what it was before. People buy previously owned domains and used them
for other things than what the website started off to be. So Google is just
giving the site some time to show it's true colors.:-)


> I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
> site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability.

There is no fixing ATM. I have several sites that were in the same case. I
can't prove right now that they were not shown in the index the first 6
months other than a couple of people I know know about it also. This is
something you are just going to have to wait for with your site.

>I
> have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I
> don't want to make the same mistake again.

Don't blame you!

Stacey

--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Lampspecs" <Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
message news:Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
>
> I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
> whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
> would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.
>
> My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
> old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
> this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
> by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in
> Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
> process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it said
> that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an
> hour.
>
> [image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]
>
> I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
> site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability. I
> have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I
> don't want to make the same mistake again.
>
> *Please PM me if you can .*
>
>

Have a read of this
http://www.stephanspencer.com/archiv...n-session-ids/

T.J.
http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory.co.uk

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

>
>I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
>whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
>would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.

You could be searching under seo uk, then, or seo services, or seo
consultant. Or Google consultant. Ho hum :-)

>My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
>old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
>this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
>by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in
>Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
>process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it said
>that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an
>hour.
>
>[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]
>
>I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
>site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability. I
>have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I
>don't want to make the same mistake again.
>
>*Please PM me if you can .*

Um... testimonials. Odd what people will believe in. Bye then!

BB

Jezsta Web Productions Wrote:
>
> There is no fixing ATM. I have several sites that were in the same
> case. I
> can't prove right now that they were not shown in the index the first
> 6
> months other than a couple of people I know know about it also. This
> is
> something you are just going to have to wait for with your site.
>
>
> >I
> > have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
> I
> > don't want to make the same mistake again.
>
> Don't blame you!
>
> Stacey
>
> --
> Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
> http://christmas-stuff.net
> A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
> http://jezsta.com

Dear Stacy,


Thanks for taking the trouble to reply it is appreciated. What does ATM
stand for?

I didn't buy this domain I registered it in about 1996, but it has just
been used as a testing site with no real content.

Mabee I am reading this wrongly, but Google was indexing my site and it
said so on th screen, but very slowley, I only had two pages indexed
until about two weeks ago when it went up to 12 n two days. then all of
a sudden I get the message sayingthat none of my pages are indexed. If I
follow the link "information for Webmasters" it explains Googles design
guidelines and invites me to submit a re-inclusuion request.

Consequently I read this as meaning that whilst it was indexing the
site and had reached the grand total of 12 pages it had decided not to
continue the process because it does not linke my content. Is this
assumung too much?

Why in the UK? Well because we are using Netsuite and the whole site is
generated by a series of customerisable templates. If there is a problem
and I believe that you think I am possibly being too impatient, then
fixing the site by a corespondence course as against 1/2 a day face to
face round the table did not seem like the best way to go.

The reason I wanted an expert is that I am not sure if the problem is
the code, design or the data content.


--
Lampspecs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampspecs's Profile: http://techiegroups.com/member.php?userid=872
View this thread: http://www.techiegroups.com/showthread.php?t=121529

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

>
>I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
>whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
>would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.
>
>My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
>old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
>this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
>by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in
>Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
>process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it said
>that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an
>hour.
>
>[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]
>
>I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
>site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability. I
>have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I
>don't want to make the same mistake again.
>
>*Please PM me if you can .*


Do you want to sell lamps?

You could use an affiliate scheme to pay a % of sales and get more
traffic and sales that way. You'd pay for results - which is what you
want to be doing even if you go the SEO route.

"Lampspecs" <Lampspecs.2hujjt@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
message news:Lampspecs.2hujjt@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
<snip>

> Dear Stacy,
>
>
> Thanks for taking the trouble to reply it is appreciated. What does ATM
> stand for?

You are welcome. ATM means "At the moment".

> I didn't buy this domain I registered it in about 1996, but it has just
> been used as a testing site with no real content.

So a site doing not much of anything. Was it ever indexed with anything of
the testing stuff with links and PR? OK, I checked the archives and didn't
find anything.

> Mabee I am reading this wrongly, but Google was indexing my site and it
> said so on th screen, but very slowley, I only had two pages indexed
> until about two weeks ago when it went up to 12 n two days. then all of
> a sudden I get the message sayingthat none of my pages are indexed. If I
> follow the link "information for Webmasters" it explains Googles design
> guidelines and invites me to submit a re-inclusuion request.

Well that Google Guidelines is given as a general follow through for
everything.:-)

> Consequently I read this as meaning that whilst it was indexing the
> site and had reached the grand total of 12 pages it had decided not to
> continue the process because it does not linke my content. Is this
> assumung too much?

Could be. It might not be that also. Or it could also be that your pages are
having the bot going in a circle sort of speak like. Kind of hung and not
able to countinue through the site. I see TJ gave you a web page about
session IDs.

Your image if I recall showed that the bot was receiving 6 errors right?
Seems you might want to look into that.

Here : http://whois.domaintools.com/lampspecs.co.uk doesn't have any info
about the site. 4 months should be long enough to have info on it. And it
has nothing. I am finding that quite odd. Not even a title is listed.
http://whois.domaintools.com/christmas-stuff.net As you can see with my site
I registered it in Sept and it has plenty of info on it.

I see that most of your pages have gone supplemental. Not really good.
Meaning your whole site is to similar and won't get listed if it is in
supplemental status on the pages. Supplemental pages mean it is reading as
too similar with other pages that Google has cached for your site.

From really looking at the pages that Google knows about it is skipping
through and picking out pages on it's own. Is there any reason to not list
some pages statically? I mean do all the pages have to be with session IDs?
Why not have some static pages? At least for your main pages, your sub's can
be done with is this fashion as they can be less important.

I ran a couple of your pages through spider simulators here
http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider/. And the one I use a lot which is quite
useful - http://www.ranks.nl/tools/spider.html . The ranks.nl didn't like
very many of your pages. They seem to be to large even though they don't
appear to be that large from the human eye. The other site has various
spider simulators on it.

Your session id's are pretty long
/About;jsessionid=ac112b2a1f43ccfd43c8e2834be2a73db 95fc3f4169f.e3eSbNyQc3mLe34SchuRbNeTaN90n6jAmljGr5 XDqQLvpAe

I then ran the W3C Validate and well there were quite a few errors on it.
Too many for me to go through and see if one of them is a serious problem
that is stopping the bot from reading and crawling each link.

> Why in the UK? Well because we are using Netsuite and the whole site is
> generated by a series of customerisable templates. If there is a problem
> and I believe that you think I am possibly being too impatient, then
> fixing the site by a corespondence course as against 1/2 a day face to
> face round the table did not seem like the best way to go.

Oh, OK. Maybe you should try some other type of program to generate your
site. I feel that can be a problem also.


> The reason I wanted an expert is that I am not sure if the problem is
> the code, design or the data content.

Could be everything involved. Sorry, about no good news. But there is
something wrong with the site and the way it is generated. My advice and you
are not going to enjoy hearing this. But to rebuild it with some static
pages for your main pages at least and try to find another type program to
generate your pages for you on the fly.

Also you don't have any headings that I seen on the pages or decent alt text
for the images(you have the image name like bulb.gif). They should have like
"Yellow GE" 100 Watt Soft Light Bulb".

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you . I am amazed to
the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
see these when I use a browser.

I am reluctant to abandon Netsuite as the Netsuite system doesn't just
generate the we pages it is our whole stock-control/accounts/CRM rolled
into one and it has been quite an expensive investment. The investment
in time is far more than the cash cost (Over $10,000) it has taken two
people more than 4 months of working 7 days a weeks to get this far. I
would rahter fix the site than abandon it.


--
Lampspecs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampspecs's Profile: http://techiegroups.com/member.php?userid=872
View this thread: http://www.techiegroups.com/showthread.php?t=121529

"Lampspecs" <Lampspecs.2huxae@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
message news:Lampspecs.2huxae@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
>
> Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you . I am amazed to
> the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
> see these when I use a browser.

No problem.:-)

>
> I am reluctant to abandon Netsuite as the Netsuite system doesn't just
> generate the we pages it is our whole stock-control/accounts/CRM rolled
> into one and it has been quite an expensive investment. The investment
> in time is far more than the cash cost (Over $10,000) it has taken two
> people more than 4 months of working 7 days a weeks to get this far. I
> would rahter fix the site than abandon it.

I can understand the hard work that is involved of putting sites together
with products.:-) I am doing that all the time.

Then maybe you could follow my other suggestion of making the main pages
static and have the products load later from the links from the main pages.
I think this would you site gain better exposure and try to do those
other little bits I told you about. I think you can create a good template
with headings and such then let the program load the products. Or it should
work that way.

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

Big Bill Wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs
> <Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> >I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and
> fix
> >whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
> >would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.
>
> You could be searching under seo uk, then, or seo services, or seo
> consultant. Or Google consultant. Ho hum :-)
>
> >My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
> >old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
> >this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
> >by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11
> in
> >Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
> >process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it
> said
> >that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about
> an
> >hour.
> >
> >[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]
> >
> >I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
> >site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability.
> I
> >have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
> I
> >don't want to make the same mistake again.
> >
> >*Please PM me if you can .*
>
> Um... testimonials. Odd what people will believe in. Bye then!
>
> BB

I don't really understand this reply. I can find lots of people who
claim to be able to all of whom would be happy to charge me fees,
but that is not enough. I want to appoint someone with some degree of
certainty that they know what they are doing and are going to get some
results.

So I have asked for a recommendation, what else am I supposed to do. I
have reached the limit of my knowledge trying to fix this site and I
have run out of patience. Peoples livelihoods depend on making this
site work so I have to find a solution.


--
Lampspecs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampspecs's Profile: http://techiegroups.com/member.php?userid=872
View this thread: http://www.techiegroups.com/showthread.php?t=121529

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:54:14 +0100, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2huxae@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

> Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you . I am amazed to
> the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
> see these when I use a browser.

Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.

Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

"Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
newsp.tjmau9hu26l578@borek...
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:54:14 +0100, Lampspecs
> <Lampspecs.2huxae@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Once again Stacy, I would like to thank you for you . I am amazed to
>> the the session ID's when I use the http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not
>> see these when I use a browser.
>
> Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.
>
> Borek


Try looking at it in Opera with
switched off.

Tip to OP:
Get Opera, disable , set to author mode
and set to emulate text browser.

--
T.J.
http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory.co.uk

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:24:22 +0100, T.J. <no1@home.invalid> wrote:

>>> I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
>>> http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.
>>
>> Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.

> Try looking at it in Opera with switched off.

Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
With a small typo?

Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:19:14 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hv022@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

>
>Big Bill Wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs
>> <Lampspecs.2hudvo@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and
>> fix
>> >whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank
>> >would be nice, but a listing is really the first step.
>>
>> You could be searching under seo uk, then, or seo services, or seo
>> consultant. Or Google consultant. Ho hum :-)
>>
>> >My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months
>> >old. The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN,
>> >this has been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index
>> >by Yahoo and that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11
>> in
>> >Google.com and 3 on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the
>> >process of removing my site from its listings. On the day that it
>> said
>> >that my site was being removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about
>> an
>> >hour.
>> >
>> >[image: http://www.cp-lighting.co.uk/files/banned.gif]
>> >
>> >I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this
>> >site an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability.
>> I
>> >have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
>> I
>> >don't want to make the same mistake again.
>> >
>> >*Please PM me if you can .*
>>
>> Um... testimonials. Odd what people will believe in. Bye then!
>>
>> BB
>
>I don't really understand this reply. I can find lots of people who
>claim to be able to all of whom would be happy to charge me fees,
>but that is not enough. I want to appoint someone with some degree of
>certainty that they know what they are doing and are going to get some
>results.
>
>So I have asked for a recommendation, what else am I supposed to do. I
>have reached the limit of my knowledge trying to fix this site and I
>have run out of patience. Peoples livelihoods depend on making this
>site work so I have to find a solution.

If you want me to take you on, I could, but I don't have testimonials.
What's already been attempted on the site that you know of?

BB

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:59:33 -0500, Lampspecs
<Lampspecs.2hujjt@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote:

>
>Jezsta Web Productions Wrote:
>>
>> There is no fixing ATM. I have several sites that were in the same
>> case. I
>> can't prove right now that they were not shown in the index the first
>> 6
>> months other than a couple of people I know know about it also. This
>> is
>> something you are just going to have to wait for with your site.
>>
>>
>> >I
>> > have spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and
>> I
>> > don't want to make the same mistake again.
>>
>> Don't blame you!
>>
>> Stacey
>>
>> --
>> Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
>> http://christmas-stuff.net
>> A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
>> http://jezsta.com
>
>Dear Stacy,
>
>
>Thanks for taking the trouble to reply it is appreciated. What does ATM
>stand for?

At The Moment.

>I didn't buy this domain I registered it in about 1996, but it has just
>been used as a testing site with no real content.
>
>Mabee I am reading this wrongly, but Google was indexing my site and it
>said so on th screen, but very slowley, I only had two pages indexed
>until about two weeks ago when it went up to 12 n two days. then all of
>a sudden I get the message sayingthat none of my pages are indexed. If I
>follow the link "information for Webmasters" it explains Googles design
>guidelines and invites me to submit a re-inclusuion request.
>
>Consequently I read this as meaning that whilst it was indexing the
>site and had reached the grand total of 12 pages it had decided not to
>continue the process because it does not linke my content. Is this
>assumung too much?

Probably way too much. You have a new site. You could read my stuff
here www.kruse.co.uk/sandbox.htm which might illuminate things for
you. If people are dependent upon the proceeds from this site for
their livelihoods then really you should have looked before you leapt
here.

>Why in the UK? Well because we are using Netsuite and the whole site is
>generated by a series of customerisable templates. If there is a problem
>and I believe that you think I am possibly being too impatient, then
>fixing the site by a corespondence course as against 1/2 a day face to
>face round the table did not seem like the best way to go.
>
>The reason I wanted an expert is that I am not sure if the problem is
>the code, design or the data content.

If the scenario is as I understand it, the problem is more likely to
be that you're sandboxed. If you get the site tidied up as much as you
can, then maybe you can try to get in Yahoo's directory. If you
succeed, you're in good shape. Get in a few more reputable
directories. Maybe this'll you get un-sandboxed. Maybe it'll give
you the provenance you need for that.

BB

"Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
newsp.tjmf5zb726l578@borek...
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:24:22 +0100, T.J. <no1@home.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>> I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
>>>> http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.
>>>
>>> Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.
>
>> Try looking at it in Opera with switched off.
>
> Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
> With a small typo?

Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:45:51 +0100, Jezsta Web Productions
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>>>>> I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
>>>>> http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.
>>>>
>>>> Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.
>>
>>> Try looking at it in Opera with switched off.
>>
>> Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
>> With a small typo?
>
> Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

You think it is browser related? I doubt... are , browsers
are browsers

Borek
--
www.chembuddy.com/?left=BATE&right=pH-calculator
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode
http://www.bpp.com.pl/?left=dysleksja&right=dysleksja
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

"Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
newsp.tjm2xm0i26l578@borek...
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:45:51 +0100, Jezsta Web Productions
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>>>>> I am amazed to the the session ID's when I use the
>>>>> http://oy-oy.eu/page/spider I do not see these when I use a browser.
>>>>
>>>> Chack if the ids are visible when the are disabled.
>>
>>> Try looking at it in Opera with switched off.
>>
>> Perhaps my English fails me, but isn't it exactly what I have proposed?
>> With a small typo?
>
> Yes, except for the browser type.:-)

You think it is browser related? I doubt... are , browsers
are browsers

LOL!! Borek you asked if that is what you proposed. I said with a little
joke, yes except for the browser type.:-) Get it? Funny is what it is
suppose to be.

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

I really don't like to see HTML like this:

... style='visibility:hidden' height=0 ..

There may be a legitimate reason for it, but IMO it's quite likely to
generate a false positive for hidden text even if it's actuallz benign.

You have 288 validation errors:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ampspecs.co.uk

At the very least, you should fix the Google verification metatag by
chopping the " /" out of the back.

On 27 Nov 2006 08:21:35 -0800, "Phil Payne"
<phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote:

>I really don't like to see HTML like this:
>
>.. style='visibility:hidden' height=0 ..
>
>There may be a legitimate reason for it, but IMO it's quite likely to
>generate a false positive for hidden text even if it's actuallz benign.
>
>You have 288 validation errors:
>
>http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ampspecs.co.uk
>
>At the very least, you should fix the Google verification metatag by
>chopping the " /" out of the back.

Phil, who was that to?

BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/art-prints-sitemap.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm

Big Bill wrote:

> On 27 Nov 2006 08:21:35 -0800, "Phil Payne"
> <phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >I really don't like to see HTML like this:
> >
> >.. style='visibility:hidden' height=0 ..
> >
> >There may be a legitimate reason for it, but IMO it's quite likely to
> >generate a false positive for hidden text even if it's actuallz benign.
> >
> >You have 288 validation errors:
> >
> >http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ampspecs.co.uk
> >
> >At the very least, you should fix the Google verification metatag by
> >chopping the " /" out of the back.
>
> Phil, who was that to?

Click the validator link.

On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:22:59 -0500, Lampspecs wrote:

>
> I need to find an SEO expert in the UK who can look at my site and fix
> whatever is wrong so that it is fully indexed. Getting a good rank would
> be nice, but a listing is really the first step.
>
> My domain www.lampspecs.co.uk is old but the site is only 4 months old.
> The site has over 3000 pages and has about 100 indexed by MSN, this has
> been static for the past two months. We have 700 pages index by Yahoo and
> that has fallen from 1300 in the last week. We have 11 in Google.com and 3
> on Google.co.uk for now... BUT Google is in the process of removing my
> site from its listings. On the day that it said that my site was being
> removed it briefly listed 25 pages for about an hour.
>
>
> I am looking for a recommendation for an SEO expert who can fix this site
> an provide a list of sites/testomonials to prove their ability. I have
> spent a lot of money on optimisation in the past to no avail and I don't
> want to make the same mistake again.

It doesn't look like your site is banned by Google. Google shows
somewhere between 25 and 41 pages in the index, but only 14 are not in the
Supplemental Results.

Can you get rid of the session IDs?

Can you grep your log files to see
what URLs the bots are requesting to see if they are hitting the session
IDs?

Another thing that could be done is to optimize the product pages. This
is an example of a non-optimized <title> tag:
5 Foot 58W 827 Very Warm White (GE)

Take a look at the pages in the Supplemental Results, for example this
page:
/Light-Bulbs-Tubes/Infra-Red/Infra-Red-375W-ES-Satin

Notice how there is no content on the page except for a single image.
The alt text of the image is: irr125L.gif

There is a <title> tag that does not have any keywords in it, and an
unordered list with no valuable text. There is no <h1> tag.

You have many similar product pages with nothing
significant to distinguish them in the eyes of Google. There should be
information on your product pages to tell Google what they are about and
that they are different from one another.

Here is another similar example from the Supplemental Results:
/Light-Bulbs-Tubes/Mains-Voltage-SES/64861T-IM-40W-SES-Pearl-Osram

You are also using Meta redirects on your "product removed" pages:
<meta http-equiv="Refresh"
content="3;url=http://www.lampspecs.co.uk"></HEAD>

A 404 page can contain a list of other products and a search box to
encourage people who land there to continue browsing, but I don't think it
is a good idea to redirect.

Don't take the information in the Google Webmaster Control Panel
literally. It is often outdated and inaccurate information. Compare the
"last visited" date in the control panel with the actual last visit in the
logs -- it's probably wrong.

Use the robots.txt file to keep search engines out of the links to
login/register, add items to cart, view basket, checkout, etc.

It's probably not a good idea to link to the directory on your links page.
Submit your site to good directories, but only for one-way links -- expect
to pay for most of them. Don't join reciprocal linking schemes.

The home page <title> is very specific and highly competitive. I would
expand the <title> tag in the early stages to try to capture regional and
long-tail keywords. Once you have enough inbound links (a lot), then you
can target something as specific as "light bulbs". I think a regional
keyword would be a good idea -- possibly an entire section of