I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=

any comments? I don't think it's anything I can control in any way at
all.

BB

Big Bill schreef:
> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>
> any comments? I don't think it's anything I can control in any way at
> all.

I do have them for a few years now, nothing special.

The only way you can have them is by having both pages rank high for a
specific keyword.



--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html

"tonnie" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:4sjrisF107iqbU1@mid.individual.net...
> Big Bill schreef:
>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>>
>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>
>> any comments? I don't think it's anything I can control in any way at
>> all.
>
> I do have them for a few years now, nothing special.
>
> The only way you can have them is by having both pages rank high for a
> specific keyword.
>
>

That's my understanding of how it works, too.

For instance, one of my sites regularly comes up with split results for the
search terms "Ted Joans," "Kirby Doyle," "Hammond Guthrie," "beat
generation," and "beat generation books" (with or without quotes) and has
for the past several years.

In each case, each of the 2 pages in question are equally relevant to the
search term.

I don't know if PR affects this at all; in 2 of the cases mentioned above
the pages have identical PR, in 2 cases the PR varies by 1 point (5 & 4),
and in 1 case, the PR varies by 2 points (6 & 4).

It's a real nice thing & makes the links stand out on the page a little
more. Just love it when it happens.

cheers!
Denise

Denise schreef:
> "tonnie" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
> news:4sjrisF107iqbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Big Bill schreef:
>>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>>>
>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>>
>>> any comments? I don't think it's anything I can control in any way at
>>> all.
>> I do have them for a few years now, nothing special.
>>
>> The only way you can have them is by having both pages rank high for a
>> specific keyword.
>>
>>
>
> That's my understanding of how it works, too.
>
> For instance, one of my sites regularly comes up with split results for the
> search terms "Ted Joans," "Kirby Doyle," "Hammond Guthrie," "beat
> generation," and "beat generation books" (with or without quotes) and has
> for the past several years.
>
> In each case, each of the 2 pages in question are equally relevant to the
> search term.

Exactly that is what makes it happen.

> I don't know if PR affects this at all; in 2 of the cases mentioned above
> the pages have identical PR, in 2 cases the PR varies by 1 point (5 & 4),
> and in 1 case, the PR varies by 2 points (6 & 4).

PR has nothing to do with it, it all comes down to 'relevance'.

> It's a real nice thing & makes the links stand out on the page a little
> more. Just love it when it happens.

It realy is. And thats IMHO exactly what Google want's to acchieve with
it. Pages standing out.


--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html

-
"tonnie" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:4sjtgoF102m62U1@mid.individual.net...
> Denise schreef:
>> "tonnie" <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote in message
>> news:4sjrisF107iqbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Big Bill schreef:
>>>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>>>>
>>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>>>
>>>> any comments? I don't think it's anything I can control in any way at
>>>> all.
>>> I do have them for a few years now, nothing special.
>>>
>>> The only way you can have them is by having both pages rank high for a
>>> specific keyword.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That's my understanding of how it works, too.
>>
>> For instance, one of my sites regularly comes up with split results for
>> the search terms "Ted Joans," "Kirby Doyle," "Hammond Guthrie," "beat
>> generation," and "beat generation books" (with or without quotes) and has
>> for the past several years.
>>
>> In each case, each of the 2 pages in question are equally relevant to the
>> search term.
>
> Exactly that is what makes it happen.
>
>> I don't know if PR affects this at all; in 2 of the cases mentioned above
>> the pages have identical PR, in 2 cases the PR varies by 1 point (5 & 4),
>> and in 1 case, the PR varies by 2 points (6 & 4).
>
> PR has nothing to do with it, it all comes down to 'relevance'.

But I wonder if that's so. Because I don't see this split result with low-PR
pages (say, PR3 or less).

>
>> It's a real nice thing & makes the links stand out on the page a little
>> more. Just love it when it happens.
>
> It realy is. And thats IMHO exactly what Google want's to acchieve with
> it. Pages standing out.
>
>
> --
> Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
> Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
> Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html

Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;

You mean:
http://www.google.com/search?q=bokma

:-p

--
John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html

"Denise" <dionyza@hotmail.com> wrote:

> But I wonder if that's so. Because I don't see this split result with
> low-PR pages (say, PR3 or less).

http://www.google.com/search?q=toxicice%20programming

Quite sure that both are 3 or less. (toxicice.com has 3)

--
John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html

"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9883C22F772EDcastleamber@130.133.1.4...
> Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>
> You mean:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=bokma
>
> :-p

I think it has happen to all of us at one time or another in the past.:-)
Don't know where BB has been.:-)

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...=apple+kitchen
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...flower+kitchen
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...i+pepper+decor
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...=tapestry+rugs
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...art+shaped+rug
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...%3Aen&q=jezsta

Stacey
--
Christmas Stuff - All Christmas all the time!
http://christmas-stuff.net
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On 23 Nov 2006 01:05:22 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:

>Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>
>You mean:
>http://www.google.com/search?q=bokma
>
>:-p

I have a couple like that myself, I now see;

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...se&btnG=Search

BB

Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

> On 23 Nov 2006 01:05:22 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:
>
>>Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> I suppose we should study it now it's finally happened to one of us;
>>
>>You mean:
>>http://www.google.com/search?q=bokma
>>
>>:-p
>
> I have a couple like that myself, I now see;
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...se&btnG=Search

Hmmm... nobody says things like: oh, that's cool to be #1 with your last
name! (and #2 for that matter, and #6 or so).

--
John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html