|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#1 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Dear all,
I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has too much power. Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have rankings slashed. Any much appreciated. Stewart Mitchell |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:19:06 +0100, Mitchell <sgmitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and > struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and > would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have > rankings slashed. I would ask at webmasterworld.com Borek -- http://www.chembuddy.com http://www.ph-meter.info http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Mitchell" <sgmitchell@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1163326746.336478.254530@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... > Dear all, > > I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, > why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has > too much power. > > Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and > struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and > would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have > rankings slashed. > > Any much appreciated. > > Stewart Mitchell > I have a site which has been hit by the minus 30 penalty and will never appear above 31 in the SERPS. It went from over 10,000 visitors a day to a just few hundred overnight and has been like this for nearly 12 months. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Mitchell schreef:
> Dear all, > > I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, > why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has > too much power. Only chewing tabacco has been chewed on more. > Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and > struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and > would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have > rankings slashed. > > Any much appreciated. I would phone kinderstart.com but if they will answer you, and when they do it won't be a rant, i can't tell you. -- Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/ Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
> Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and
> struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and > would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have > rankings slashed. BMW? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 12 Nov 2006 02:19:06 -0800, "Mitchell" <sgmitchell@gmail.com>
wrote: >Dear all, > >I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, >why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has >too much power. > >Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and >struggled as a result? SEO Dave does, his old lingerie site. BB |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:54:19 -0000, "T.J." <no1@home.invalid> wrote:
> >"Mitchell" <sgmitchell@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1163326746.336478.254530@b28g2000cwb.googleg roups.com... >> Dear all, >> >> I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, >> why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has >> too much power. >> >> Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and >> struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and >> would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have >> rankings slashed. >> >> Any much appreciated. >> >> Stewart Mitchell >> > >I have a site which has been hit by the >minus 30 penalty and will never appear above 31 >in the SERPS. >It went from over 10,000 visitors a day to a just few >hundred overnight and has been like this for nearly >12 months. I can't see that as being permanent. Did you check it over for everything? Silly me, of course you have. Weeeeell, I'd think it would come out eventually. BB |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 12 Nov 2006 04:38:29 -0800, "Phil Payne"
<phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote: >> Does anyone know of a company/site that has been blacklisted and >> struggled as a result? I need to interview someone for a case study and >> would like to highlight what it means to be delisted, or even have >> rankings slashed. > >BMW? That was just cosmetic. You could ask this guy; http://www.rob-james.com/ he's a well-known magician (apparently, I don't follow these things) and his site was ding great and then it tanked for a while. His site was very spammy, loads wrong with it, and it got banned or demoted or whatever, and he cleaned it up and submitted a reinclusion request and it's doing well again. But he could be a good study because he's already someone in the public eye to a degree. You can mention I suggested you contact him. Not that we're buds but he'll probably ask how you knew about any of this. BB |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
"Mitchell" <sgmitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all, > > I am writing an article about how Google goes about blacklisting sites, > why it happens, whether it is fair, and whether the search giant has > too much power. To show the other side of the coin, maybe also tell the story that some sites *don't* get blacklisted despite of what they are doing. Another good question, or at least something I am wondering about, why is it next to impossible to have blogspot spam sites removed even though those sites are using JavaScript redirects which has clearly an affiliate number to a site that's clearly spammy. (One might wonder why this whole thing is possible in the first place). Finally: does a company that's not evil really need a mantra staying the obvious? -- John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site: --> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
John Bokma schreef:
> Finally: does a company that's not evil really need a mantra staying the > obvious? One could ask the monks in Tibet the same. ![]() -- Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/ Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl> wrote:
> John Bokma schreef: > >> Finally: does a company that's not evil really need a mantra staying >> the obvious? > > One could ask the monks in Tibet the same. ![]() A mantra for mediation is different I guess. -- John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site: --> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|