Hello,

I have been working hard on this site
http://www.internetsecurity101.net for many months, but am a real
novice when it comes to search engine optimization. I am receiving
most of my hits from Yahoo, some MSN, and very few from Google. My
most popular page is
http://www.internetsecurity101.net/slowcomputer.html, which is where I
receive the majority of my search engine traffic. I used to receive
lots of hits from MSN on http://www.internetsecurity101.net/free.html,
but it seems since I added content to that page, I don't get much
search engine traffic on that page. Up until now I have focussed my
efforts primarily on creating orriginal content and what I hope is a
useful, informative, attractive, easy to navigate site. Any
/advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Chris H.

Internet Security 101 - http://www.internetsecurity101.net

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> internetsecurity101.net

Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic, no
matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:50:21 +0200, Borek
<m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

>On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> internetsecurity101.net
>
>Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
>this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic, no
>matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).
>
>Best,
>Borek

Should he not put a little more effort into the wording in his titles?
-
<title>Internet Security 101</title>
<title>How To Speed Up Your Computer</title>

Borek wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> internetsecurity101.net
>
>
> Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
> this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic,
> no matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).

I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
up by the spiders.

davidof wrote:
> Borek wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> internetsecurity101.net
> >
> >
> > Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
> > this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic,
> > no matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).
>
> I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
> they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
> up by the spiders.

Hello David,

I did know that, but my primary reason for posting to newsgroups is not
to have my link archived by a number of websites and picked up by the
spiders. I am a novice webmaster and have lots of questions and I have
learnt a lot by reading posts in newsgroups and posting a few questions
that I have.

Chris H.

davidof wrote:
> Borek wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> internetsecurity101.net
> >
> >
> > Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
> > this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic,
> > no matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).
>
> I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
> they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
> up by the spiders.

Hello David,

I did know that, but my primary reason for posting to newsgroups is not
to have my link archived by a number of websites and picked up by the
spiders. I am a novice webmaster and have lots of questions and I have
learnt a lot by reading posts in newsgroups and posting a few questions
that I have.

Chris H.

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:14:51 +0200, davidof
<david.george@g-dumpthisbit-mail.com> wrote:

>Borek wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:04:09 +0200, Chris H. <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> internetsecurity101.net
>>
>>
>> Without looking at the page itself - domain was registered late January
>> this year, so it is a little bit too young for a good Google traffic,
>> no matter how it is optimized (on-site and IBL).
>
>I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
>they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
>up by the spiders.

How'd they work that out?

BB :-)
--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/nacht...lphin-box.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/arman...ttle-kiss.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/lladr...-topper-l.html

> I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
> they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
> up by the spiders.

I thought that didn't work any more? Doesn't seem to do me much good.

Phil Payne wrote:
> > I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
> > they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
> > up by the spiders.
>
> I thought that didn't work any more? Doesn't seem to do me much good.

I didn't think that it did much good anymore either Phil. If it did
work with all the postings I have made my pagerank should be higher
than 3! :-)

On 16 Sep 2006 02:46:45 -0700, "Phil Payne"
<phil@isham-research.co.uk> wrote:

>> I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
>> they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
>> up by the spiders.
>
>I thought that didn't work any more? Doesn't seem to do me much good.

I'm trying to conduct an experiment with my site below, see how that
gets on.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/adam-...t-i150456.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/all-g...dren/cece.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/all-t...-american.html

On 16 Sep 2006 03:45:55 -0700, "Chris H." <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Phil Payne wrote:
>> > I think someone has told Chris H. that if he posts his link in the n.g.
>> > they will get archived by a number of websites and will then get picked
>> > up by the spiders.
>>
>> I thought that didn't work any more? Doesn't seem to do me much good.
>
>I didn't think that it did much good anymore either Phil. If it did
>work with all the postings I have made my pagerank should be higher
>than 3! :-)

I'm thinking more in terms of indexing myself, getting out of the
supplementals and so forth.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/adam-...t-i150456.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/all-g...dren/cece.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/all-t...-american.html