PHWinfo banniere

Titres
PORTAIL ANNUAIRE ARTICLES COMPARATEUR HÉBERGEURS DEVIS FORUMS RÉDUCTEUR D'URL
Précédent   PHWinfo > Forums Hébergement > Diriger une société d'hébergement > alt.internet.seo > Google itself sucks at SEO
S'inscrire FAQ Membres Recherche Messages du jour Marquer les forums comme lus
alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics.

Google itself sucks at SEO

Réponse
 
LinkBack Outils de la discussion
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h25   #1
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Google itself sucks at SEO

Take a look at this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!


Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
properly ranking our pages then?

Hmm.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h32   #2
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 9 Sep 2006 08:25:42 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Take a look at this:
>http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655


>No headers.


So ?

Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong.
Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.

>How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!
>


Don't have to be in a search engine to find pages.
Afterall, you found it.
And if you can find it, then anyone can LOL

>Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
>pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
>properly ranking our pages then?


Ask Matt Cutts.

Google it, you will find him. :p

>Hmm.


--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h39   #3
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Paul wrote:
> >Take a look at this:
> >http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655

>
> >No headers.

>
> So ?


Yeah... it's quite obvious why this is pretty insane.

> Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is wrong.
> Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.


Um... Google... is a... search... engine...

> >How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!
> >

>
> Don't have to be in a search engine to find pages.
> Afterall, you found it.
> And if you can find it, then anyone can LOL


Oookay...

> >Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
> >pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
> >properly ranking our pages then?

>
> Ask Matt Cutts.


Shouldn't he reply himself?

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h44   #4
Proud-Collector.com
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
anyway. I do agree with the message bit though.

KimmoA wrote:
> Take a look at this:
> http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655
>
> No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!
>
>
> Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
> pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
> properly ranking our pages then?
>
> Hmm.


  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h47   #5
www.1-script.com
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Paul wrote:

> So ?


> Also, you subject title "Google itself sucks at SEO" is
> wrong.
> Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.


Even more: they are openly anti-SEO company.

--
Cheers,
Dmitri
See Site Sig Below



--
+------------------------------------------------+
| Follow alt.internet.search-engines threads |
| with your Firefox Live Bookmarks! Set it up at |
| http://www.1-script.com/forums/ |
+------------------------------------------------+

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h49   #6
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Proud-Collector.com wrote:
> Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
> anyway.


Yeah... they have PR 10 for all their domains. They are sooo biased!

> I do agree with the message bit though.


Good! ^_^

PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
IRL by replying before the quote!

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 16h55   #7
Proud-Collector.com
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

KimmoA wrote:
> Proud-Collector.com wrote:
> > Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
> > anyway.

>
> Yeah... they have PR 10 for all their domains. They are sooo biased!
>
> > I do agree with the message bit though.

>
> Good! ^_^
>
> PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
> IRL by replying before the quote!


That was a little harsh.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h02   #8
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 9 Sep 2006 08:55:30 -0700, "Proud-Collector.com"
<webmaster@proud-collector.com> wrote:

>That was a little harsh.


He is a troll. Trolls do that.

--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h16   #9
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

www.1-script.com wrote:
> > Google has NEVER claimed to be an SEO company.

>
> Even more: they are openly anti-SEO company.


Huh?

Proud-Collector.com wrote:
> > PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
> > IRL by replying before the quote!

>
> That was a little harsh.


I know. But it's true! And, as the smiley suggests, it was not a
serious insult.

Paul wrote:
> >That was a little harsh.

>
> He is a troll. Trolls do that.


Stop trolling, troll.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h23   #10
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 9 Sep 2006 09:16:31 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Proud-Collector.com wrote:
>> > PS: You just commited a Usenet sin equivalent to raping underage girls
>> > IRL by replying before the quote!

>>
>> That was a little harsh.

>
>I know. But it's true! And, as the smiley suggests, it was not a
>serious insult.
>
>Paul wrote:
>> >That was a little harsh.

>>
>> He is a troll. Trolls do that.

>
>Stop trolling, troll.


Learn to post properly you IDIOT.

I DID NOT say
>Paul wrote:
>> >That was a little harsh.


Troll.

--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/earrings-107.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/necklaces-201.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/beaded/chokers-213.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h27   #11
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Paul wrote:
> Learn to post properly you IDIOT.


You do that, IDIOT.

> I DID NOT say
> >Paul wrote:
> >> >That was a little harsh.

>
> Troll.


Yes, YOU DID. Learn how to read properly, retard.

PS: Troll.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h40   #12
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 9 Sep 2006 09:27:59 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Paul wrote:
>> Learn to post properly you IDIOT.

>
>You do that, IDIOT.
>
>> I DID NOT say
>> >Paul wrote:
>> >> >That was a little harsh.

>>
>> Troll.

>
>Yes, YOU DID. Learn how to read properly, retard.


No I did NOT
Proud-Collector.com did.

YOU learn to read properly. Dork.

I see you only post out of school hours LOL
Go away and play with your special uncle.
--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h44   #13
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Paul wrote:
> I see you only post out of school hours LOL


1) I don't go to school.
2) I probably don't live in the same country as you.

> I'm gay.


Now, THAT is a fake quote.

Now stop ruining every thread I post to Usenet, you psycho stalker.

PS: Troll.

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 17h48   #14
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 9 Sep 2006 09:44:59 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Paul wrote:
>> I see you only post out of school hours LOL

>
>1) I don't go to school.


Expelled were we ?

>2) I probably don't live in the same country as you.


No, You are in Sweden.

>> I'm gay.


Never said that. Not from me.

>Now, THAT is a fake quote.


Is it ?
Or are you waiting for the legal age to be so ?

>Now stop ruining every thread I post to Usenet, you psycho stalker.


Go away then.
You have been a troll since day one of your existance here.

I have gotten bored of you now . Added to my k/f
BYE

--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 09/09/2006, 18h03   #15
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Paul wrote:
> >1) I don't go to school.

>
> Expelled were we ?


No? Maybe you were, and that's why you have such complexes over it?

> >2) I probably don't live in the same country as you.

>
> No, You are in Sweden.


See? You were wrong again.

> >Now, THAT is a fake quote.

>
> Is it ?
> Or are you waiting for the legal age to be so ?


Now you're confusing yourself again.

> >Now stop ruining every thread I post to Usenet, you psycho stalker.

>
> Go away then.


No. You go away, luser.

....

Maybe the rest of us can get back on-topic now that the lamer has
(hopefully) left us?

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 12h44   #16
Roy Schestowitz
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

__/ [ Proud-Collector.com ] on Saturday 09 September 2006 16:44 \__

> KimmoA wrote:
>> Take a look at this:
>> http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=35655
>>
>> No headers. How do they expect to be found in search engines this way?!
>>
>>
>> Seriously, though... What signals does this send out, if Google's own
>> pages don't validate and lack real headers? Are they really capable of
>> properly ranking our pages then?
>>
>> Hmm.

>
> Maybe they just give themselves a very high rank on every search
> anyway. I do agree with the message bit though.


We had a discussion about this a week or two ago. It sets a bad example and
discriminates against newcomers (e.g. Web browsers), among many other
distriments.

I urge you to read

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.i...34806f1c5f1e69
http://tinyurl.com/l4bnw

rather than 'reinvent the wheel', so to speak, only days after an identical
discussion.

Best wishes,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Linux: just set it and forget about it
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 131 total, 1 running, 130 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 12h47   #17
Roy Schestowitz
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

__/ [ Paul ] on Saturday 09 September 2006 17:48 \__

> On 9 Sep 2006 09:44:59 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Paul wrote:
>>> I see you only post out of school hours LOL

>>
>>1) I don't go to school.

>
> Expelled were we ?
>
>>2) I probably don't live in the same country as you.

>
> No, You are in Sweden.
>
>>> I'm gay.

>
> Never said that. Not from me.
>
>>Now, THAT is a fake quote.

>
> Is it ?
> Or are you waiting for the legal age to be so ?
>
>>Now stop ruining every thread I post to Usenet, you psycho stalker.

>
> Go away then.
> You have been a troll since day one of your existance here.
>
> I have gotten bored of you now . Added to my k/f
> BYE
>
> --
> Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to
> wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.



*LOL* at .sig

Would you like a rod with that?

Best wishes,

Roy

--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Linux: stop maintenance; get more actual work done
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 5 Jul 20 12:15 last=S
http://iuron.com - build a non-profit search engine
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 14h16   #18
Paul
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:47:18 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:

>*LOL* at .sig




>Would you like a rod with that?


Nah, leave Rod out of it <G>

>Best wishes,
>
>Roy


plh
Paul

--
American Indian Jewelry
http://www.firstpeople.us/native-ame...n-Artwork.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 21h22   #19
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.

If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 21h28   #20
Big Bill
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

On 10 Sep 2006 13:22:42 -0700, "KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
>ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.


No, you do that.

>If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
>to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.


Difficult to defend you when you respond like that, isn't it?

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...a-i137200.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...ngel-fish.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/mats-...aby-seals.html
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 21h32   #21
tonnie
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

KimmoA schreef:
> Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
> ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.
>
> If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
> to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.


Nice one KimmoA.

Did we see just a little rant between some of you guys, we now see who
you really are.

Do you think that anyone is going to take your postings seriously after
this one?

I for sure am not.

--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 21h55   #22
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

tonnie wrote:
> > Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
> > ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.
> >
> > If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
> > to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.

>
> Nice one KimmoA.
>
> Did we see just a little rant between some of you guys, we now see who
> you really are.


What? Make sense.

> Do you think that anyone is going to take your postings seriously after
> this one?


Why the fuck not?

> I for sure am not.


Your loss. I don't give a shit.

Big Bill wrote:
> >Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
> >ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.

>
> No, you do that.


Um... no. Stop lying.

> >If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
> >to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.

>
> Difficult to defend you when you respond like that, isn't it?


What? Make sense.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 22h06   #23
Roy Schestowitz
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

__/ [ KimmoA ] on Sunday 10 September 2006 21:55 \__

> tonnie wrote:
>> > Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
>> > ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.
>> >
>> > If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
>> > to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.

>>
>> Nice one KimmoA.
>>
>> Did we see just a little rant between some of you guys, we now see who
>> you really are.

>
> What? Make sense.
>
>> Do you think that anyone is going to take your postings seriously after
>> this one?

>
> Why the fuck not?
>
>> I for sure am not.

>
> Your loss. I don't give a shit.
>
> Big Bill wrote:
>> >Wow. This "Paul" luser seems to be a professional Internet troll. He
>> >ruins every thread I make with his stupid off-topic bullshit.

>>
>> No, you do that.

>
> Um... no. Stop lying.
>
>> >If you're reading this (and I know you do, since you haven't got the IQ
>> >to create a "killfile"): Go fuck yourself.

>>
>> Difficult to defend you when you respond like that, isn't it?

>
> What? Make sense.
>
> --
> http://www.kimmoa.se/


*plonk*

--
VISTA - Venereally-Infectious, Sexually-Transmitted Aliment
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
10:05pm up 52 days 10:17, 10 users, load average: 0.33, 0.51, 0.62
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 10/09/2006, 22h39   #24
KimmoA
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> *plonk*


Haha. Lamer.

PS: Look forward to more confusing threads, you ignorant bastard.

--
http://www.kimmoa.se/

  Réponse avec citation
Vieux 11/09/2006, 00h24   #25
John Bokma
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Google itself sucks at SEO

"KimmoA" <kimmoa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> *plonk*

>
> Haha. Lamer.
>
> PS: Look forward to more confusing threads, you ignorant bastard.


Wise word of advice: if the majority of a group is against you, just
ignore the majority. There is a small group that is neutral at this point,
but you are working very hard to make this group very small.

If you want to disrupt this group, the net cops will wake up and take
action. Just let it go, learn from others, and post your opinion *on*
topic.

A simple tool of :

each ploink is worth 50 points. If they start talking again to you within
a month, you get 150 points extra.

If they call you crazy: 200 points. If they recommend seeing a
psychiatrist 250 points. If they suggest you forgot your medication: 300
points.

If anyone doing the above takes you serious within 3 months: 500 points.


I made 13,500 points so far in this group alone :-D.


--
John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html
  Réponse avec citation
Réponse


Outils de la discussion

Règles de messages
Vous ne pouvez pas créer de nouvelles discussions
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des réponses
Vous ne pouvez pas envoyer des pièces jointes
Vous ne pouvez pas modifier vos messages

Les balises BB sont activées : oui
Les smileys sont activés : oui
La balise [IMG] est activée : oui
Le code HTML peut être employé : non
Trackbacks are oui
Pingbacks are oui
Refbacks are oui


Fuseau horaire GMT +1. Il est actuellement 10h18.


Édité par : vBulletin® version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 Tous droits réservés.
Version française #16 par l'association vBulletin francophone
PHWinfo est un site Éducation Sans Frontières ©2000-2008
Ad Management by RedTyger
©Tous droits réservés par les parties respectives
Page generated in 0,51872 seconds with 33 queries