On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:0tj1f2pbagi298uopan2q21cmrckgu6efd@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:20:06 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
><snip>
>
>>>So, how does your article that will sit well with Google if they
>>>incorporated your so called Care Rank then well it would knock them out
>>>huh?
>>
>> Do as I say, not as I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some
>> things.
>>
>> BB
>
>For which Bill. I don't see that?

The one where Google don't validate.

BB



--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:35:28 +0100, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:17:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
><Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>> I like Care Rank. Evidence ascertainable by an algo that someone has
>>> put effort into a site. Does it validate? That's probably not happened
>>> by chance. Is it accessible? I doubt that's coincidence. Somebody
>>> cares.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>So still that would take out a lot of sites that someone who "cared" made
>>their own site and didn't know how to code. They "cared" and spent time on
>>it just like anyone could. What are they going to have to do hire a caring
>>designer or SEO to make sure the code is valid with no errors? Why do they
>>have to pay money or have someone to do it to show they care when they have
>>cared from the start? See it doesn't make sense now does it?
>>
>>Stacey
>
>Easy SERP to get
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&r...signer&spell=1
>
>To add what Stacey said. You could have a scraper site for instance.
>All valid code, all clean, neat and tidy. Still be spam whichever way
>you see it. Will it get a boost because the webmaster/SEO cared ?
>Nope.
>
>I can see someone coming out with Typo Rank soon. Where the less
>typo's you have, the better you are.
>
>Then there will be Grammar Rank. The list goes on.

I think we might assume we already have those.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:17:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:9kj1f254vcv6cij6itbgj8hm9n0dd7hqt4@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:58:42 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>news:flf1f2tjkkc9e8bv2gf3e16lu0riivlhdc@4ax.com ...
>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:28:36 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites
>>>>>> that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure
>>>>>> it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover
>>>>>> what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also.
>>>>>
>>>>>Wouldn't be more care to make sure it is neat and tidy also. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Is an algo going to be able to deduce neat and tidy? I doubt it. Valid
>>>> it can do, though.
>>>
>>>Can an algo be created to know if it is neat and tidy? Yeah it can, the
>>>same
>>>with valid code if they wanted to. Will they I don't think so, it is too
>>>much work as they haven't yet and it really doesn't make sense to do it. I
>>>was just making a little comment about the word "care". Maybe you should
>>>have used the phrase "valid rank" or something else.
>>>
>>>Stacey
>>
>> I like Care Rank. Evidence ascertainable by an algo that someone has
>> put effort into a site. Does it validate? That's probably not happened
>> by chance. Is it accessible? I doubt that's coincidence. Somebody
>> cares.
>>
>> BB
>
>So still that would take out a lot of sites that someone who "cared" made
>their own site and didn't know how to code. They "cared" and spent time on
>it just like anyone could. What are they going to have to do hire a caring
>designer or SEO to make sure the code is valid with no errors? Why do they
>have to pay money or have someone to do it to show they care when they have
>cared from the start? See it doesn't make sense now does it?

If Google don't want an index littered with crap sites they have to go
by something. Good intentions don't necessarily translate into
results. Would you sell a house by someone if you were and estate
agent that had been built by someone who cared greatly about it but
knew nothing about how houses should be built so none of it worked
properly? Google aren't going to index and display any old crapola, I
have no doubt they intended to at first but the costs are prohibitive.
This is the new, shape up or ship out Google we're looking at.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:22:09 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>Google aren't going to index and display any old crapola,

Are you kidding ?
95+% of my google alerts are scraper sites.

--
Handmade Jewelry
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/pearl/bracelet-110.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/turquoi...klace-110.html
http://www.houstoncrafts.com/gemstone/bracelet-209.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ch63f2h8tvik6ligb5tf95cfk753o25bm0@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:0tj1f2pbagi298uopan2q21cmrckgu6efd@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:20:06 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>><snip>
>>
>>>>So, how does your article that will sit well with Google if they
>>>>incorporated your so called Care Rank then well it would knock them out
>>>>huh?
>>>
>>> Do as I say, not as I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some
>>> things.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>For which Bill. I don't see that?
>
> The one where Google don't validate.
>
> BB

Really Bill, show me where Google states you *must* have valid error free
code to be in the index.

Stacey

--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
newst63f21qkpcsf1vam7c31hq30lmookdggl@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:35:28 +0100, Paul
> <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>

>>I can see someone coming out with Typo Rank soon. Where the less
>>typo's you have, the better you are.
>>
>>Then there will be Grammar Rank. The list goes on.
>
> I think we might assume we already have those.
>
> BB

Why Bill? You can't just assume things.

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jj63f2tlf0352d96c9snbmpttmsfvu182b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:17:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:9kj1f254vcv6cij6itbgj8hm9n0dd7hqt4@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 23:58:42 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>news:flf1f2tjkkc9e8bv2gf3e16lu0riivlhdc@4ax.co m...
>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:28:36 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see
>>>>>>> sites
>>>>>>> that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure
>>>>>>> it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover
>>>>>>> what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wouldn't be more care to make sure it is neat and tidy also. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Is an algo going to be able to deduce neat and tidy? I doubt it. Valid
>>>>> it can do, though.
>>>>
>>>>Can an algo be created to know if it is neat and tidy? Yeah it can, the
>>>>same
>>>>with valid code if they wanted to. Will they I don't think so, it is too
>>>>much work as they haven't yet and it really doesn't make sense to do it.
>>>>I
>>>>was just making a little comment about the word "care". Maybe you
>>>>should
>>>>have used the phrase "valid rank" or something else.
>>>>
>>>>Stacey
>>>
>>> I like Care Rank. Evidence ascertainable by an algo that someone has
>>> put effort into a site. Does it validate? That's probably not happened
>>> by chance. Is it accessible? I doubt that's coincidence. Somebody
>>> cares.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>So still that would take out a lot of sites that someone who "cared" made
>>their own site and didn't know how to code. They "cared" and spent time on
>>it just like anyone could. What are they going to have to do hire a caring
>>designer or SEO to make sure the code is valid with no errors? Why do they
>>have to pay money or have someone to do it to show they care when they
>>have
>>cared from the start? See it doesn't make sense now does it?
>
> If Google don't want an index littered with crap sites they have to go
> by something. Good intentions don't necessarily translate into
> results. Would you sell a house by someone if you were and estate
> agent that had been built by someone who cared greatly about it but
> knew nothing about how houses should be built so none of it worked
> properly? Google aren't going to index and display any old crapola, I
> have no doubt they intended to at first but the costs are prohibitive.
> This is the new, shape up or ship out Google we're looking at.
>
> BB

Now you are really stretching Bill. Just because the code isn't valid
without errors means it will be crap!!! Just because someone makes a valid
error free code site doesn't make it not crap!!! What makes a crap site is
the content and the outcome.

Google is displaying them sites that are not valid code! Sorry I am not
seeing this in Google. ie: Google getting rid of sites that are not valid
error free code. Sorry Bill you are not making any sense. For one "who"
states the code is valid and why? And why should they state it? Understand
this and you will understand why Google doesn't follow this. Google follows
what their bots can read and pick up. See your house reasoning doesn't make
sense for everything. Let's use something else like recipes, just because
you don't follow the recipe doesn't mean the meal won't turn out as good.
Some times it might even be better.

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ao92f25638fs454sf5u8k3abrcoia6lgne@4ax.com...
<snip>

>
> and this is mine
>
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>
> BB

Well, if I were you Bill I would be enjoying it will it lasts! :-) Oh, I
guess you are, let's see how long though.:-)

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:01:11 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>newst63f21qkpcsf1vam7c31hq30lmookdggl@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:35:28 +0100, Paul
>> <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
><snip>
>
>>>I can see someone coming out with Typo Rank soon. Where the less
>>>typo's you have, the better you are.
>>>
>>>Then there will be Grammar Rank. The list goes on.
>>
>> I think we might assume we already have those.
>>
>> BB
>
>Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>
>Stacey

I assume I can.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:41:34 +0100, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:22:09 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>Google aren't going to index and display any old crapola,
>
>Are you kidding ?
>95+% of my google alerts are scraper sites.

Different kind of crapola.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:00:03 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:ch63f2h8tvik6ligb5tf95cfk753o25bm0@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>news:0tj1f2pbagi298uopan2q21cmrckgu6efd@4ax.com ...
>>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:20:06 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>So, how does your article that will sit well with Google if they
>>>>>incorporated your so called Care Rank then well it would knock them out
>>>>>huh?
>>>>
>>>> Do as I say, not as I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some
>>>> things.
>>>>
>>>> BB
>>>
>>>For which Bill. I don't see that?
>>
>> The one where Google don't validate.
>>
>> BB
>
>Really Bill, show me where Google states you *must* have valid error free
>code to be in the index.
>
>Stacey

I didn't mean that, I think we were at cross-purposes there for a
minute.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:06:30 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:ao92f25638fs454sf5u8k3abrcoia6lgne@4ax.com.. .
><snip>
>
>>
>> and this is mine
>>
>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>
>> BB
>
>Well, if I were you Bill I would be enjoying it will it lasts! :-) Oh, I
>guess you are, let's see how long though.:-)
>
>Stacey

What lasts? I'll still be there, I'll still go up eventually. If Dave
wants to divert links away from his allegedly profitable endeavours
then it won't make a difference to me, just to his alleged income.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:0ge3f2pu3v63qnsk33qfo3res3j8iikqsl@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:00:03 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:ch63f2h8tvik6ligb5tf95cfk753o25bm0@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>news:0tj1f2pbagi298uopan2q21cmrckgu6efd@4ax.co m...
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:20:06 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>So, how does your article that will sit well with Google if they
>>>>>>incorporated your so called Care Rank then well it would knock them
>>>>>>out
>>>>>>huh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do as I say, not as I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>> BB
>>>>
>>>>For which Bill. I don't see that?
>>>
>>> The one where Google don't validate.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>Really Bill, show me where Google states you *must* have valid error free
>>code to be in the index.
>>
>>Stacey
>
> I didn't mean that, I think we were at cross-purposes there for a
> minute.
>
> BB

Well what did you mean? OK Bill if you say so, here is where even of the
basic of English you don't understand. Now you stated "Do as I say, not as
I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some things."

I asked- For which Bill, I don't see that?

You said - The one where Google don't validate. (BTW should be doesn't)

Now again, tell me how that is Google's attitude to do as I say not as I do
type thing. Plus, give me an example of Google having this attitude.

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:q5e3f2ph4dabovh6hfit72f3h7t957ih40@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:01:11 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>newst63f21qkpcsf1vam7c31hq30lmookdggl@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:35:28 +0100, Paul
>>> <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
>><snip>
>>
>>>>I can see someone coming out with Typo Rank soon. Where the less
>>>>typo's you have, the better you are.
>>>>
>>>>Then there will be Grammar Rank. The list goes on.
>>>
>>> I think we might assume we already have those.
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>>
>>Stacey
>
> I assume I can.
>
> BB

Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:qhe3f2h27p7pn1mrr6m14n61t9d5qri5fr@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:06:30 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:ao92f25638fs454sf5u8k3abrcoia6lgne@4ax.com. ..
>><snip>
>>
>>>
>>> and this is mine
>>>
>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>>
>>> BB
>>
>>Well, if I were you Bill I would be enjoying it will it lasts! :-) Oh, I
>>guess you are, let's see how long though.:-)
>>
>>Stacey
>
> What lasts? I'll still be there, I'll still go up eventually. If Dave
> wants to divert links away from his allegedly profitable endeavours
> then it won't make a difference to me, just to his alleged income.

You weren't there a few months ago now were you? In fact you weren't showing
up even for the easiest of SERPs. Nothing is for certain so enjoy it while
it lasts!

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:59:08 +0200, Jezsta Web Productions
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>>> Why Bill? You can't just assume things.

>> I assume I can.

> Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!

Told you I don't understand your English on occasions

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-meter
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

"Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
newsp.teyc7gbc26l578@borek...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:59:08 +0200, Jezsta Web Productions
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>
>>> I assume I can.
>
>> Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!
>
> Told you I don't understand your English on occasions

I thought since you didn't understand my English I would speak another
language.:-)

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:01:40 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:qhe3f2h27p7pn1mrr6m14n61t9d5qri5fr@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:06:30 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>news:ao92f25638fs454sf5u8k3abrcoia6lgne@4ax.com ...
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> and this is mine
>>>>
>>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...e+Search&meta=
>>>>
>>>> BB
>>>
>>>Well, if I were you Bill I would be enjoying it will it lasts! :-) Oh, I
>>>guess you are, let's see how long though.:-)
>>>
>>>Stacey
>>
>> What lasts? I'll still be there, I'll still go up eventually. If Dave
>> wants to divert links away from his allegedly profitable endeavours
>> then it won't make a difference to me, just to his alleged income.
>
>You weren't there a few months ago now were you? In fact you weren't showing
>up even for the easiest of SERPs.

Was I not? I wasn't aware this was ever discussed.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:28:41 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
>newsp.teyc7gbc26l578@borek...
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:59:08 +0200, Jezsta Web Productions
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>>
>>>> I assume I can.
>>
>>> Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!
>>
>> Told you I don't understand your English on occasions
>
>I thought since you didn't understand my English I would speak another
>language.:-)
>
>Stacey

You can stop now!

BB :-)
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:22:18 +0200, Borek
<m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:59:08 +0200, Jezsta Web Productions
><Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>
>>> I assume I can.
>
>> Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!
>
>Told you I don't understand your English on occasions
>
>Best,
>Borek

Just say Gesundheit!

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:51:57 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:0ge3f2pu3v63qnsk33qfo3res3j8iikqsl@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:00:03 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>news:ch63f2h8tvik6ligb5tf95cfk753o25bm0@4ax.com ...
>>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>news:0tj1f2pbagi298uopan2q21cmrckgu6efd@4ax.c om...
>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:20:06 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
>>>>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>>><snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>So, how does your article that will sit well with Google if they
>>>>>>>incorporated your so called Care Rank then well it would knock them
>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>huh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do as I say, not as I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some
>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BB
>>>>>
>>>>>For which Bill. I don't see that?
>>>>
>>>> The one where Google don't validate.
>>>>
>>>> BB
>>>
>>>Really Bill, show me where Google states you *must* have valid error free
>>>code to be in the index.
>>>
>>>Stacey
>>
>> I didn't mean that, I think we were at cross-purposes there for a
>> minute.
>>
>> BB
>
>Well what did you mean? OK Bill if you say so, here is where even of the
>basic of English you don't understand. Now you stated "Do as I say, not as
>I do. That seems to be Google's attitude to some things."
>
>I asked- For which Bill, I don't see that?
>
>You said - The one where Google don't validate. (BTW should be doesn't)
>
>Now again, tell me how that is Google's attitude to do as I say not as I do
>type thing. Plus, give me an example of Google having this attitude.
>
>Stacey

Google doesn't validate, now or ever so far as I know, but it has
asked for sites to validate in its guidelines, ages ago that was.
Didn't last for very long..

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

Big Bill schreef:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:28:41 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>
>> "Borek" <m.borkowski@delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message
>> newsp.teyc7gbc26l578@borek...
>>> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:59:08 +0200, Jezsta Web Productions
>>> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Why Bill? You can't just assume things.
>>>>> I assume I can.
>>>> Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf!
>>> Told you I don't understand your English on occasions
>> I thought since you didn't understand my English I would speak another
>> language.:-)
>>
>> Stacey
>
> You can stop now!

Especialy when it is wrong.

Weise zu vieler Luft und Raum im Kopf

White to many air in your head...


It should have been:

Weißt du, zu viel luft und Raum im Kopf.


--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:mim3f21k3bh5p4t6u6tfp2hq9fcj1h00tb@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:01:40 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
> <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:
<snip>

>>You weren't there a few months ago now were you? In fact you weren't
>>showing
>>up even for the easiest of SERPs.
>
> Was I not? I wasn't aware this was ever discussed.

It wa