Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as if
something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail? Am I
right in understanding that the people who previously supported Freds
work are now filled with animosity towards him? Lost. Thanks for your
time.
Stacey wrote:
> "dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:1154401564.850123.228180@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> > Hello Everyone,
> > Sorry if I posted this message multiple times, but I am not sure if I
> > did this correctly. (Newbie to posting questions, sorry)
> > Anyways, I would like to hear from anyone who has worked with Fred
> > Joly. Please post candidly. Looking forward to good news.
>
>
> What would be your need to know? Plus are you looking for some SEO or what?
>
> Stacey
>
> --
> Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
> http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
> Sell your crafts for ***FREE*** - eCraftsOnline
> http://www.ecraftsonline.net/sell-your-crafts/

"dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote:

> Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
> understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as if
> something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail? Am I
> right in understanding that the people who previously supported Freds
> work are now filled with animosity towards him? Lost. Thanks for your
> time.

This is not email, and please don't top post. If you have no clue what top
posting is (IIRC I have told you several times before), Google for it, and
learn and stop wasting resources.

--
John

Googlebot Stats: http://johnbokma.com/perl/googlebot-statistics.html

John Bokma wrote:
> "dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> > Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
> > understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as if
> > something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail? Am I
> > right in understanding that the people who previously supported Freds
> > work are now filled with animosity towards him? Lost. Thanks for your
> > time.
>
> This is not email, and please don't top post. If you have no clue what top
> posting is (IIRC I have told you several times before), Google for it, and
> learn and stop wasting resources.
>
> --
> John
>
> Googlebot Stats: http://johnbokma.com/perl/googlebot-statistics.html

OK- I did as you asked and looked it up. I apologize for my
inexperience. This is not my genre. Anyway, I thought I was blogging
Stacey? But you were in the conversations as well, so you will do too.
My partner and I own a small Baby Linens company we started talking to
an SEO. There was negative feedback and we don't understand what was
going on. Do you know?Thanks for your time.

"dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:1155517776.996227.23110@74g2000cwt.googlegrou ps.com...
<snip>

>
> OK- I did as you asked and looked it up. I apologize for my
> inexperience. This is not my genre. Anyway, I thought I was blogging
> Stacey? But you were in the conversations as well, so you will do too.
> My partner and I own a small Baby Linens company we started talking to
> an SEO. There was negative feedback and we don't understand what was
> going on. Do you know?Thanks for your time.


If you feel you need to contact us please use the contact form on our Jezsta
site.

Stacey
--
Crafts - Directory - Your Online Crafting Source
http://www.ecraftsonline.net/
A New Focus In Web Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
http://jezsta.com

"dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote:

> John Bokma wrote:
>> "dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
>> > understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as
>> > if something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail?
>> > Am I right in understanding that the people who previously
>> > supported Freds work are now filled with animosity towards him?
>> > Lost. Thanks for your time.
>>
>> This is not email, and please don't top post. If you have no clue
>> what top posting is (IIRC I have told you several times before),
>> Google for it, and learn and stop wasting resources.

> OK- I did as you asked and looked it up. I apologize for my
> inexperience.

You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

> This is not my genre. Anyway, I thought I was blogging
> Stacey?

This is nog a blog. More information on Usenet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet

When replying always remove all lines that are no longer needed
(especially signatures).

Furthermore, to get the most of Usenet, don't use Google, but get a Usenet
account and use a good client.

> But you were in the conversations as well, so you will do too.
> My partner and I own a small Baby Linens company we started talking to
> an SEO. There was negative feedback and we don't understand what was
> going on. Do you know?Thanks for your time.

If you have a link, I can have a look at it.

--
John Freelance Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/

Firefox Keywords: http://johnbokma.com/firefox/keymarks-explained.html

On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:

>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

GW Bush is getting away with it.
--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On 13 Aug 2006 18:09:37 -0700, "dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net>
wrote:

>
>John Bokma wrote:
>> "dcashley" <dcashley@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Stacey, I'm sending e-mails to a few people, My partner and I don't
>> > understand what is going on, we can't follow the blogs and feel as if
>> > something or some information is missing. Is this your e-mail? Am I
>> > right in understanding that the people who previously supported Freds
>> > work are now filled with animosity towards him? Lost. Thanks for your
>> > time.
>>
>> This is not email, and please don't top post. If you have no clue what top
>> posting is (IIRC I have told you several times before), Google for it, and
>> learn and stop wasting resources.
>>
>> --
>> John
>>
>> Googlebot Stats: http://johnbokma.com/perl/googlebot-statistics.html
>
>OK- I did as you asked and looked it up. I apologize for my
>inexperience. This is not my genre. Anyway, I thought I was blogging
>Stacey? But you were in the conversations as well, so you will do too.
>My partner and I own a small Baby Linens company we started talking to
>an SEO. There was negative feedback and we don't understand what was
>going on. Do you know?Thanks for your time.

If the SEO in question was Fred I doubt anyone here would describe him
as being up to anything much at the moment. If you're set on using
Fred, my advice would be that you give him a few months to recuperate,
he's apparently not been too well lately. If you just need an SEO,
there's plenty more available.

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:
>
>>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?
>
> GW Bush is getting away with it.

We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

--
John Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/

Perl RSS Builder: http://johnbokma.com/perl/rss-web-feed-builder.html

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:42:26 +0200, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com>
wrote:

>>> You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>>> inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?
>>
>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>
> We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

Just the opposite, that will give him some occupation, right now he plays
with things that are not his own.

Best,
Borek
--
http://www.chembuddy.com
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-meter
http://www.terapia-kregoslupa.waw.pl

On 14 Aug 2006 05:42:26 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:

>Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Aug 2006 02:53:43 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:
>>
>>>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>>>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?
>>
>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>
>We shouldn't have taught him how to wank, I guess.

ROFL
--
Wank a man off, and he will enjoy himself for a day. Teach a man how to wank, and he'll be a wanker for the rest of his life.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

dcashley wrote:

this is a deranged bitch and I wouldn't gice her anything

You kids are so mature - for second graders. Can't you find some
play-dough or coloring books to occupy your time?


> GW Bush is getting away with it.

Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. And we all know that he
is the reason we are paying $3.00 for gas (first president in the
history of the US to not use reserves to keep gas prices reasonable).

Just because most Americans are willing to fold up and accept a BS
story about terrorists (who are not listed on the coroners report of
the WTC and more than half of them are still alive and counted for) -
doesn't mean that Georgie is getting away with anything. It only means
that we are not strong enough as a people to stand up for ourselves.

You guys obviously don't have enough to do, so please visit
www.savetheinternet.com and do something about it.

On 14 Aug 2006 16:20:40 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>You kids are so mature - for second graders. Can't you find some
>play-dough or coloring books to occupy your time?
>
>
>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>
>Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
>just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
>that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
>executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. And we all know that he
>is the reason we are paying $3.00 for gas (first president in the
>history of the US to not use reserves to keep gas prices reasonable).
>
>Just because most Americans are willing to fold up and accept a BS
>story about terrorists (who are not listed on the coroners report of
>the WTC and more than half of them are still alive and counted for) -
>doesn't mean that Georgie is getting away with anything. It only means
>that we are not strong enough as a people to stand up for ourselves.
>
>You guys obviously don't have enough to do, so please visit
>www.savetheinternet.com and do something about it.

We seem to be getting more than our fair share lately, don't we?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@
74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:

>
>
>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>
> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
> that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
> executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11.

I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there was
someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11



--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com

Karl Groves wrote:
> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there was
> someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11

Research it for yourself.

Do you know what "Operation Northwoods" is?

Do you know what NORAD does?

Do you know what NORAD was doing on 9/11? (Operation Vigilant Guardian)

The "plane" that hit the pentagon was a missile, probably from a
helicopter. The planes that hit the WTC were not American Airlines
flights, they were remote controlled cargo planes. I challenge you to
find ONE photo of a logo (or even passenger windows) on either of the
planes that hit the towers.

NEVER, in the history of the world, has a building of this magnitude
EVER collapsed entirely due to a fire or from being struck by an
airplane (like the Empire State building was in 1945). On many
occasions, buildings have burned for weeks without collapsing. You
see, it takes exposure to temperatures of over 3000 degrees fahrenheit
for hours before the steel in this type of structure would even weaken
(did the people jumping and waving from the windows look like they were
experiencing 3000 degree heat?). Even the fire chief was on the 78th
floor with a plan to extinguish the fires. And if the steel had weaken
enough to collapse, the top (collapsing) floors would have fallen on
the floors under it where the steel wasn't weakened. There is no doubt
that both trade towers and building 7 were demolished with
strategically placed charges set on ALL FLOORS of both towers. Ask the
firefighters who were there how many explosions they heard. Hmm - so
who was in charge of security at the WTC, for American Airlines, for
the Airport, AND associated with the insurance group that held an
insurance policy on the WTC that specifically covered terrorist acts?
GW's little brother Marvin?

There is plenty of information out there that explains what really
happened - but don't expect the major networks or news corporations to
tell you this (they have already been paid for).

I'd have to say that you're a major kook if you believe an "official
story" that has more holes in it than a sponge. Follow the money.
Demand the TRUTH.

On 14 Aug 2006 19:38:54 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Karl Groves wrote:
>> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there was
>> someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>
>Research it for yourself.
>
>Do you

take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit
--
Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves
<karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:

>lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@
>74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
>
>>
>>
>>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>>
>> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
>> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know
>> that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and
>> executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11.
>
>I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there was
>someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11

Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got
Karl, too!

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Paul wrote:
> take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit

and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to
lose freedom of speech on the internet

You're just too busy (or stupid in your case) to care about anything
unless it lands in your lap. Well wake up, it's in your face right
now. The House already approved it in June - Congress is voting as we
speak.

Paul, for someone advertising american indian art, one might think that
you'd be concerned about losing your freedoms (again). You call
yourself a wolf, but you are just a lame sheep.

On 14 Aug 2006 23:41:34 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Paul wrote:
>> take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit
>
>and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to
>lose freedom of speech on the internet


You see, this is where you miss the point entirely.

My original reply as to this remark :

>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?

To which I replied with :

GW Bush is getting away with it.


The point I was making was GW managed to be inexperienced yet climbed
into the driving seat [so to speak] and has been excused a number of
times. No one mentioned politics or 9-11. You brought that into it.


>You're just too busy (or stupid in your case)

IQ of 142 doesn't make me stupid.


>to care about anything

Thats more like it.


>unless it lands in your lap. Well wake up, it's in your face right
>now. The House already approved it in June - Congress is voting as we
>speak.

Never voted in my life and I am not going to start now [41]

>Paul, for someone advertising american indian art, one might think that
>you'd be concerned about losing your freedoms (again).

You lost your freedom the day you were born.

> You call yourself a wolf, but you are just a lame sheep.

Say that to my face and they will be your last words too.
--
Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:32:24 +0100, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On 14 Aug 2006 23:41:34 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>>Paul wrote:
>>> take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit
>>
>>and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to
>>lose freedom of speech on the internet
>
>
>You see, this is where you miss the point entirely.
>
>My original reply as to this remark :
>
>>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone
>>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused?
>
>To which I replied with :
>
>GW Bush is getting away with it.
>
>
>The point I was making was GW managed to be inexperienced yet climbed
>into the driving seat [so to speak] and has been excused a number of
>times. No one mentioned politics or 9-11. You brought that into it.
>
>
>>You're just too busy (or stupid in your case)
>
>IQ of 142 doesn't make me stupid.

Depends on the scale. There's several.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1155609534.417065.209200@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com:

>
> Karl Groves wrote:
>> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there
>> was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>
> Research it for yourself.
>

Shaddap, kook.
This isn't an appropriate newsgroup for your kookery, so fuck off.


--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com

Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in
news:bhq2e2t6e4s1t20jj7m0hctghjnu8lqgme@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves
> <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:
>
>>lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@
>>74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>>>
>>> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
>>> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all
>>> know that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning
>>> and executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11.
>>
>>I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there
>>was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>
> Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got
> Karl, too!
>

I love you too, Bill.



--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:38 +0200, tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl>
wrote:

>Karl Groves schreef:
>> lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in
>> news:1155609534.417065.209200@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com:
>>
>>> Karl Groves wrote:
>>>> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there
>>>> was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>>> Research it for yourself.
>>>
>>
>> Shaddap, kook.
>> This isn't an appropriate newsgroup for your kookery, so fuck off.
>
>Oh, kindergarten is out. Would you please be so kind and leave your
>daddy's pc alone and be a good boy and go play in the sandbox.

Must be chucking-out time at alt.html again.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:45:10 -0500, Karl Groves
<karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:

>Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in
>news:bhq2e2t6e4s1t20jj7m0hctghjnu8lqgme@4ax.com :
>
>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves
>> <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:
>>
>>>lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@
>>>74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> GW Bush is getting away with it.
>>>>
>>>> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is -
>>>> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all
>>>> know that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning
>>>> and executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11.
>>>
>>>I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there
>>>was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>>
>> Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got
>> Karl, too!
>>
>
>I love you too, Bill.

I know! - isn't it wonderful?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Karl Groves schreef:
> lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in
> news:1155609534.417065.209200@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com:
>
>> Karl Groves wrote:
>>> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there
>>> was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11
>> Research it for yourself.
>>
>
> Shaddap, kook.
> This isn't an appropriate newsgroup for your kookery, so fuck off.

Oh, kindergarten is out. Would you please be so kind and leave your
daddy's pc alone and be a good boy and go play in the sandbox.


--
Website Design: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/
Being found: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/being-found.html
Css templates: http://vision2form.nl/websitedesign/css-templates.html