On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:35:16 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

><lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1155691157.656598.207090@m73g2000cwd.googleg roups.com...
>> Reply to Big Bill (the only one here who cares about his world)
>
>Hey, if I say I care will you send me a link from your homepage? :-) Real
>nice PR you got.:-)
>
>Stacey

They do? I didn't look.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

On 15 Aug 2006 18:19:17 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>Reply to Big Bill (the only one here who cares about his world)
>
>> I think you'd be looking at reciprocal arrangements, if anything, like
>> they do with email. I'll carry your traffic if you'll carry mine.
>
>More like: I'll carry your traffic if you $$ PAY MONEY $$.
>
>>From what I can tell, every major ISP will bill every single site owner
>out of the registry. Those who do not pay for second-tier service will
>be left in the low bandwidth zone (which is meant to frustrate users
>into using (their) paying sites by using lag, latency, and errors).
>
>
>> >If you compete in any way with the ISP,
>>
>> Define compete.
>
>You sell SEO + they sell SEO = Banned. Heh, I'm sure they will define
>that for you as they are being given the power to do so (to what best
>suits their needs). Most of these companies are controlled by the same
>people that control the World Bank. They will gladly ban any talk
>about politics that doesn't support their agenda. Small businesses
>will ALL suffer, and monopolies will get even stronger. The Internet
>will revert to about as accessible as cable TV (pay for HBO or basic).

Much as it is now, as one has to pay for internet access anyway. One
has to have a computer etc. This is a consumer society, people have to
be given the opportunity to earn at every, er, opportunity, otherwise
society as we've known it, together with its existing power structure,
falls apart.

>The example that was given was: dearAOL.com
>They posted a site that criticizes AOL's poor ethics regarding email
>and AOL blocked access to this site through their service.

Hardly surprising. It's cheaper than offering a counter-argument and
AOL is in business to make money, not further the humanities. AOL has
a responsibility to its stock-holders etc and legally was probably
obliged to protect their interests. This isn't morals, it's business.
Senators are elected to protect communities and that means looking
after the major business players in those communities, the big
employers.

>
>> > don't be too surprised when
>> >your site isn't viewable via that ISP. If you voice an opinion that
>> >they don't "approve" of, watch it dissolve into thin air.
>>
>> They're going to sit on everything I do and everything I say, are
>> they?
>
>They work very closely with the NSA. They already are watching.
>Remember they admitted to recording every phone conversation and email
>message?

And they store this in which fantasy?

> They claim that they aren't planning on using the info, just
>holding it incase they (get a legal warrant) need it to stop
>"terrorists" (Patriot Act).
>
>
>> >They figure that they can just spend tens of millions of dollars buying
>> >our laws and then they can legally bill every single person/company
>> >that HOSTS a web site in addition to billing the users that the site is
>> >served to.
>>
>> How they going to administer any of this?
>
>I have a feeling that they will administer it UP OUR AMERICAN ASSES.
>
>The same exact way that they took over major networks during the OJ
>trial. They distract you with celebrity scandals and vote when you
>aren't paying attention.
>
>
>The Internet has allowed the people of the world a means to
>communicate, develop, and advance like we have never advanced before.

Agreed, it's a huge threat to the political structure of the planet.
Never have knowledge and ideas been so available.

>Don't let them take this tool away from us just because they have
>enough money to buy the rules. We, the people, own the internet

We do? Why am I having to pay for it then?

>- AT&T
>turned down the contract to build it and now they want to buy it or
>think they own it and can charge us "tolls". Google: "The internet is
>not a truck" for a good laugh.
>
>This is very real and is happening right now. If you care about
>freedom at all, please sign the petition and write to your senators.
>
>The good guys are: Google, eBay, most Intenet Icons

That's because this will hit their incomes, if it really happens. They
aren't good guys, just guys.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> This isn't morals, it's business.

I said ethics, not morals. Have you never heard of business ethics?

It has to do with no one ever voting for politicians again if they
allow this to happen. It has to do with AOL losing its customers (and
having to move to a free service model) since their clients realized
how the scam works and AOL is losing like 25% of their cusomers every
month.

> Senators are elected to protect communities

Are you calling what they did to the WTC "protection"?
Is the patriot act "protection"?

1% of our population is in prison.

With all this "protecting" going on, who is protecting our
constitutional rights?


> and that means looking
> after the major business players in those communities, the big
> employers.

Did you say big employers or big campaign donators? I can't hear with
all the telecom tower construction going on here. They have so many
workers.

"AT&T's top IT exec says automation of its IT systems will let it shed
more than 12,000 jobs this year without hurting its network or
service."

So who was protecting the 12,000 people who lost their jobs this year?

Hmm 12,000 x $20,000/year = just enough to pay off congress


> >They work very closely with the NSA. They already are watching.
> >Remember they admitted to recording every phone conversation and email
> >message?
>
> And they store this in which fantasy?

"The National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone
call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by
AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, people with direct knowledge of the
arrangement told USA TODAY."

read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...5-10-nsa_x.htm


> >Don't let them take this tool away from us just because they have
> >enough money to buy the rules. We, the people, own the internet
>
> We do? Why am I having to pay for it then?

You do not pay for the Internet, and you know that. The Internet will
(hopefully) still be here after you're dead. You pay to rent a server
to host your site because you can't afford to buy your own. You also
pay a connection fee that should cover the cost of the infrastructure,
wires, satellites, and all (but the cost is bent by greedy telecom
monopolies). Internet will be in some cities via Wi-Fi, regulated (and
paid for) by the city governments (your taxes).


> >This is very real and is happening right now. If you care about
> >freedom at all, please sign the petition and write to your senators.
> >
> >The good guys are: Google, eBay, most Intenet Icons
>
> That's because this will hit their incomes, if it really happens. They
> aren't good guys, just guys.

They ARE good guys. eBay is an American icon for Entrepreneurialship
and Google is a beacon for universal, multi-cultural diversity and
sharing - (theoretically) without bias.

Why do you think you are here?

Because Google doesn't sell out like our government. Google became
popular because they were bold enough to give us the truth instead of
telling us who pays them the most MONEY.

On 16 Aug 2006 00:51:46 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> This isn't morals, it's business.
>
>I said ethics, not morals. Have you never heard of business ethics?

No.

>It has to do with no one ever voting for politicians again if they
>allow this to happen.

I never voted anyway, I believe that a society run by politicians for
their own benefit is an unworkable societal model.

> It has to do with AOL losing its customers (and
>having to move to a free service model) since their clients realized
>how the scam works and AOL is losing like 25% of their cusomers every
>month.

Doesn't bother me!

>> Senators are elected to protect communities
>
>Are you calling what they did to the WTC "protection"?
>Is the patriot act "protection"?

I'm not familiar with them.

>1% of our population is in prison.

So what? Maybe they should be.

>With all this "protecting" going on, who is protecting our
>constitutional rights?

I wouldn't know what they were.

>
>> and that means looking
>> after the major business players in those communities, the big
>> employers.
>
>Did you say big employers or big campaign donators? I can't hear with
>all the telecom tower construction going on here. They have so many
>workers.

Same thing.

>"AT&T's top IT exec says automation of its IT systems will let it shed
>more than 12,000 jobs this year without hurting its network or
>service."

It still makes money. If it's based in County BB and I run it then I
expect the senator for that county to do what I tell him. Laying off
workers nationwide means I have more profits to spend in my county -
assuming that's where I spend them, of course.

>So who was protecting the 12,000 people who lost their jobs this year?

No-one if they were spread nationwide. You can't work that out?

>Hmm 12,000 x $20,000/year = just enough to pay off congress

>> >They work very closely with the NSA. They already are watching.
>> >Remember they admitted to recording every phone conversation and email
>> >message?
>>
>> And they store this in which fantasy?
>
>"The National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone
>call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by
>AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, people with direct knowledge of the
>arrangement told USA TODAY."

>read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...5-10-nsa_x.htm

Ah. Phone call records or recordings of phone calls? There's a
difference. I don't care if someone knows I called whatever number as
I could have been talking about the price of fish.

>> >Don't let them take this tool away from us just because they have
>> >enough money to buy the rules. We, the people, own the internet
>>
>> We do? Why am I having to pay for it then?
>
>You do not pay for the Internet, and you know that.

Computer, modem, broadband etc. I have to pay for access which is the
same thing.

> The Internet will
>(hopefully) still be here after you're dead. You pay to rent a server
>to host your site because you can't afford to buy your own. You also
>pay a connection fee that should cover the cost of the infrastructure,
>wires, satellites, and all (but the cost is bent by greedy telecom
>monopolies). Internet will be in some cities via Wi-Fi, regulated (and
>paid for) by the city governments (your taxes).

It'll also be hacked.

>
>> >This is very real and is happening right now. If you care about
>> >freedom at all, please sign the petition and write to your senators.
>> >
>> >The good guys are: Google, eBay, most Intenet Icons
>>
>> That's because this will hit their incomes, if it really happens. They
>> aren't good guys, just guys.
>
>They ARE good guys. eBay is an American icon for Entrepreneurialship

Yeah?

>and Google is a beacon for universal, multi-cultural diversity and
>sharing - (theoretically) without bias.

Except in China.

>
>Why do you think you are here?
>
>Because Google doesn't sell out like our government.

Except in China.

> Google became
>popular because they were bold enough to give us the truth instead of
>telling us who pays them the most MONEY.

I missed that but I expect they thought appearing to tell the truth
was best for business. And you bought that, didn't you, you sucked it
all the wa-a-a-a-a-y up!

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> I never voted anyway, I believe that a society run by politicians for
> their own benefit is an unworkable societal model.

I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.


> >Are you calling what they did to the WTC "protection"?
> >Is the patriot act "protection"?
>
> I'm not familiar with them.

1933-2001 History repeats itself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire

In 1933 (Pre-WWII), Hitler set fire to his own Parliament building and
blamed the Communist party.

In 2001, Bush demolished the WTC and blamed terrorists.


> >1% of our population is in prison.
>
> So what? Maybe they should be.

Well, people that are more intelligent and better read than you are
laughing at us - in countries all over the world. 1/100 people in jail
is an embarrasment.


> >With all this "protecting" going on, who is protecting our
> >constitutional rights?
>
> I wouldn't know what they were.

Your right to free speech that you take for granted.


> >> and that means looking
> >> after the major business players in those communities, the big
> >> employers.
> >
> >Did you say big employers or big campaign donators? I can't hear with
> >all the telecom tower construction going on here. They have so many
> >workers.
>
> Same thing.

No it isn't. Employers create jobs and benefit society.


> It still makes money. If it's based in County BB and I run it then I
> expect the senator for that county to do what I tell him. Laying off
> workers nationwide means I have more profits to spend in my county -
> assuming that's where I spend them, of course.

Do you also assume that the 12,000 AT&T workers that lost their jobs
are spending money in their counties?

On 16 Aug 2006 10:52:47 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> I never voted anyway, I believe that a society run by politicians for
>> their own benefit is an unworkable societal model.
>
>I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
>sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
>decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.

I don't eat it, that's why I won't vote for it.

>> >Are you calling what they did to the WTC "protection"?
>> >Is the patriot act "protection"?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with them.
>
>1933-2001 History repeats itself:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
>
>In 1933 (Pre-WWII), Hitler set fire to his own Parliament building and
>blamed the Communist party.
>
>In 2001, Bush demolished the WTC and blamed terrorists.
>
>
>> >1% of our population is in prison.
>>
>> So what? Maybe they should be.
>
>Well, people that are more intelligent and better read

You know these people personally, do you?

> than you are
>laughing at us - in countries all over the world. 1/100 people in jail
>is an embarrasment.

At least you have jails, here we've run out.

>> >With all this "protecting" going on, who is protecting our
>> >constitutional rights?
>>
>> I wouldn't know what they were.
>
>Your right to free speech that you take for granted.

We don't really have that here, there's libel and slander and such.
Thing is it costs big-time money to go to court so the rich can say
what they like about the poor with impunity. So the idea of free
speech is a bit of a joke.

>> >> and that means looking
>> >> after the major business players in those communities, the big
>> >> employers.
>> >
>> >Did you say big employers or big campaign donators? I can't hear with
>> >all the telecom tower construction going on here. They have so many
>> >workers.
>>
>> Same thing.
>
>No it isn't. Employers create jobs and benefit society.

Erm, not necessarily, it depends on what the people do. Tesco doesn't
create jobs locally, it destroys them along with the atmosphere, and
in the process feeds people with a bunch of pesticides and additives
that will make quite possibly them sick in the long term generating
huge hospital bills that the country can't pay because Tesco money
goes out of the country to its shareholders. Allegedly :-)) I can't
see how that benefits society. But, if you live in the immediate
vicinity of a Tesco shareholder, then you may be right as they'll have
more money to spread locally.

>> It still makes money. If it's based in County BB and I run it then I
>> expect the senator for that county to do what I tell him. Laying off
>> workers nationwide means I have more profits to spend in my county -
>> assuming that's where I spend them, of course.
>
>Do you also assume that the 12,000 AT&T workers that lost their jobs
>are spending money in their counties?

Hell no, see above.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:45:39 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>>I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
>>sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
>>decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.
>
>I don't eat it, that's why I won't vote for it.

And yet the schoolboy wants to feed us his shit to eat :/
I'll be glad when they go back from their summer holidays.
You never know, he may realise this is not a politcal group, but his
IQ doesn't reach double figures, so it looks like you will be seeing
his tosh for some time.

plh
Paul

--
Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

> >>I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
> >>sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
> >>decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.
> >
> >I don't eat it, that's why I won't vote for it.

Or are you already chewing on it, because you failed to vote?

If you don't like it = vote against it, or you won't have the luxury of
choosing. Unless you are too weak (or stupid in Paul's case) to stand
up for yourself; you will have to rely on the people around you to
stand up for you and your family while you cower in the corner.

On 16 Aug 2006 16:14:37 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>> >>I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
>> >>sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
>> >>decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.
>> >
>> >I don't eat it, that's why I won't vote for it.
>
>Or are you already chewing on it, because you failed to vote?

I don't vote you little wart infested ball bag. Don't you listen ?

>If you don't like it = vote against it, or you won't have the luxury of
>choosing. Unless you are too weak (or stupid in Paul's case)

Listen here you stupid little prick. I live in the UK
I dont give a fuck about your school homework.

You fucking loser.

> to stand up for yourself; you will have to rely on the people around you to
>stand up for you and your family while you cower in the corner.

I'd rather cower in the corner than listen to your bullshit.
Now fuck off and wait for your special uncle to bounce you on his
knee.


--
Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Paul wrote:
> >Or are you already chewing on it, because you failed to vote?
> I don't vote you little wart infested ball bag. Don't you listen ?

So what does shit taste like, coward?


> I'd rather cower in the corner than listen to your bullshit.

Or under a bridge. Right, troll?

On 16 Aug 2006 16:14:37 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>> >>I guess it doesn't really matter what you believe, then. If you just
>> >>sit there like a pussy, refusing to stand up like a man, they will
>> >>decide your destiny for you. If they feed you shit, don't eat it.
>> >
>> >I don't eat it, that's why I won't vote for it.
>
>Or are you already chewing on it, because you failed to vote?

I don't vote because voting supports the system that has me at the
bottom of it. Vote black, vote white, it's suggests acceptance of a
system I don't endorse. It can't be democracy if you can't vote
against it...

>If you don't like it = vote against it, or you won't have the luxury of
>choosing. Unless you are too weak (or stupid in Paul's case) to stand
>up for yourself; you will have to rely on the people around you to
>stand up for you and your family while you cower in the corner.

You really aren't getting this, are you? With such poor advocates, no
wonder net neutrality is going.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> I don't vote because voting supports the system

That has to be one of the most ignorant things that I have ever heard.

On 16 Aug 2006 18:03:22 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> I don't vote because voting supports the system
>
>That has to be one of the most ignorant things that I have ever heard.

Easy for you to explain why, then... ?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> >> I don't vote because voting supports the system
> >
> >That has to be one of the most ignorant things that I have ever heard.
>
> Easy for you to explain why, then... ?

Why what?

Are you saying: "Why vote, when you can pout instead"?

Are you like the kid that says "I don't care what you cook", and then
cries about "But I don't like carrots" when he gets served?

If you don't like it, be a man - stand up and fix it.

On 17 Aug 2006 00:23:42 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> >> I don't vote because voting supports the system
>> >
>> >That has to be one of the most ignorant things that I have ever heard.
>>
>> Easy for you to explain why, then... ?
>
>Why what?
>
>Are you saying: "Why vote, when you can pout instead"?
>
>Are you like the kid that says "I don't care what you cook", and then
>cries about "But I don't like carrots" when he gets served?
>
>If you don't like it, be a man - stand up and fix it.

You can't fix a bad state of affairs by voting for its continuation.
By voting, you tacitly admit that this is the only way to run a
society. If I don't want to vote for anyone, how do I voice that? Not
by voting, if I vote at all I become what I am in disagreement with.
Where is the box on the ballot paper that declares "None of the
above"? There isn't one and there never will be, not in this phony
democracy. If I wish to deface the ballot paper as an indication of my
displeasure, it's illegal! If I try to articulate dissent with the
ruling authorities, I become a criminal - can't get jobs etc. How fair
a society is that? It's a joke, is what it is.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> >If you don't like it, be a man - stand up and fix it.
>
> You can't fix a bad state of affairs by voting for its continuation.

You would choose to vote for something you don't approve of?


> By voting, you tacitly admit that this is the only way to run a
> society.

By opening your mouth, you tactically admit that you don't know what
you are talking about.

> If I don't want to vote for anyone, how do I voice that? Not
> by voting, if I vote at all I become what I am in disagreement with.
> Where is the box on the ballot paper that declares "None of the
> above"?

It is common for people to vote for Mickey Mouse when they do not
approve of a candidate; you could fill in your own name if you like. I
wouldn't be surprised if all Americans vote for Mickey this year.

You see, leaders aren't the only thing that we vote on. Every aspect
of your life has been voted upon in the past. You were dealt the short
stick because you were in the corner pouting when they asked if you
wanted your taxes raised.

If you can't even stand up for what you believe in, you aren't a man
yet.

On 17 Aug 2006 12:43:49 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> >If you don't like it, be a man - stand up and fix it.
>>
>> You can't fix a bad state of affairs by voting for its continuation.
>
>You would choose to vote for something you don't approve of?

Will you listen? I said I don't vote!

>> By voting, you tacitly admit that this is the only way to run a
>> society.
>
>By opening your mouth, you tactically admit that you don't know what
>you are talking about.
>
>> If I don't want to vote for anyone, how do I voice that? Not
>> by voting, if I vote at all I become what I am in disagreement with.
>> Where is the box on the ballot paper that declares "None of the
>> above"?
>
>It is common for people to vote for Mickey Mouse when they do not
>approve of a candidate; you could fill in your own name if you like. I
>wouldn't be surprised if all Americans vote for Mickey this year.

I don't agree with the voting procedure. I want to make it plan that
after giving careful consideration I don't approve of the whole
process. I don't want to look like I'm some kid not taking it
seriously.

>You see, leaders aren't the only thing that we vote on. Every aspect
>of your life has been voted upon in the past. You were dealt the short
>stick because you were in the corner pouting when they asked if you
>wanted your taxes raised.
>
>If you can't even stand up for what you believe in, you aren't a man
>yet.

!

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

Big Bill wrote:
> Will you listen? I said I don't vote!
> I don't agree with the voting procedure.

So are you a Communist, or just ignorant?

If you don't vote, you have no right to disagree.
Unless you consider pouting and moping to be progress.

On 19 Aug 2006 17:26:42 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:

>
>Big Bill wrote:
>> Will you listen? I said I don't vote!
>> I don't agree with the voting procedure.
>
>So are you a Communist, or just ignorant?
>
>If you don't vote, you have no right to disagree.
>Unless you consider pouting and moping to be progress.

Can you not read?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

Borek wrote:
> >> Take it for granted while you can, fool.
> > Don't paint me with the same paint brush you paint yourself with.
>
> Looks like this thread is damned...

bastards'll keep it going forever if they could

--
Ethical Search Engine Strategies
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/

On 20 Aug 2006 05:57:43 -0700, "canadafred" <canadian_web@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Borek wrote:
>> >> Take it for granted while you can, fool.
>> > Don't paint me with the same paint brush you paint yourself with.
>>
>> Looks like this thread is damned...

>bastards'll keep it going forever if they could

Only if people keep replying to it.

Ooop. We both did <G>

plh
Paul
--

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

canadafred said:
>> bastards'll keep it going forever if they could

Paul said:

> Only if people keep replying to it.
> Ooop. We both did <G>

canadafred said:
You are included in bastards above.

--
Ethical SEO Expert
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/
Search Engine Marketing Ethics
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotio...-marketing.htm
Canadian Ethical SEO Expert Fred Joly
http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotio...seo-expert.htm