|
|
|
|
||||||
| alt.internet.seo Internet search engines and related topics. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Outils de la discussion |
|
|
#17 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves
<karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote: >lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@ >74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com: > >> >> >>> GW Bush is getting away with it. ![]() >> >> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is - >> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all know >> that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning and >> executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. > >I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there was >someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11 Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got Karl, too! BB -- http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Paul wrote: > take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to lose freedom of speech on the internet You're just too busy (or stupid in your case) to care about anything unless it lands in your lap. Well wake up, it's in your face right now. The House already approved it in June - Congress is voting as we speak. Paul, for someone advertising american indian art, one might think that you'd be concerned about losing your freedoms (again). You call yourself a wolf, but you are just a lame sheep. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On 14 Aug 2006 23:41:34 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote:
> >Paul wrote: >> take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit > >and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to >lose freedom of speech on the internet You see, this is where you miss the point entirely. My original reply as to this remark : >You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone >inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused? To which I replied with : GW Bush is getting away with it. ![]() The point I was making was GW managed to be inexperienced yet climbed into the driving seat [so to speak] and has been excused a number of times. No one mentioned politics or 9-11. You brought that into it. >You're just too busy (or stupid in your case) IQ of 142 doesn't make me stupid. >to care about anything Thats more like it. >unless it lands in your lap. Well wake up, it's in your face right >now. The House already approved it in June - Congress is voting as we >speak. Never voted in my life and I am not going to start now [41] >Paul, for someone advertising american indian art, one might think that >you'd be concerned about losing your freedoms (again). You lost your freedom the day you were born. > You call yourself a wolf, but you are just a lame sheep. Say that to my face and they will be your last words too. -- Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:32:24 +0100, Paul
<lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote: >On 14 Aug 2006 23:41:34 -0700, lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote: > >> >>Paul wrote: >>> take it to alt.politics.i.dont.give.a.shit >> >>and lame people like you are exactly the reason why we are about to >>lose freedom of speech on the internet > > >You see, this is where you miss the point entirely. > >My original reply as to this remark : > >>You should learn to use something before you start using it. If someone >>inexperienced steps into a car, do you think he/she could be excused? > >To which I replied with : > >GW Bush is getting away with it. ![]() > > >The point I was making was GW managed to be inexperienced yet climbed >into the driving seat [so to speak] and has been excused a number of >times. No one mentioned politics or 9-11. You brought that into it. > > >>You're just too busy (or stupid in your case) > >IQ of 142 doesn't make me stupid. Depends on the scale. There's several. BB -- http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1155609534.417065.209200@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com: > > Karl Groves wrote: >> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there >> was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11 > > Research it for yourself. > Shaddap, kook. This isn't an appropriate newsgroup for your kookery, so fuck off. -- Karl Groves www.karlcore.com |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in
news:bhq2e2t6e4s1t20jj7m0hctghjnu8lqgme@4ax.com: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves > <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote: > >>lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@ >>74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com: >> >>> >>> >>>> GW Bush is getting away with it. ![]() >>> >>> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is - >>> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all >>> know that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning >>> and executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. >> >>I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there >>was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11 > > Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got > Karl, too! > I love you too, Bill. -- Karl Groves www.karlcore.com |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:38 +0200, tonnie <t.prasing@chello.nl>
wrote: >Karl Groves schreef: >> lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in >> news:1155609534.417065.209200@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com: >> >>> Karl Groves wrote: >>>> I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fu**ing kook if you think there >>>> was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11 >>> Research it for yourself. >>> >> >> Shaddap, kook. >> This isn't an appropriate newsgroup for your kookery, so fuck off. > >Oh, kindergarten is out. Would you please be so kind and leave your >daddy's pc alone and be a good boy and go play in the sandbox. Must be chucking-out time at alt.html again. BB -- http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:45:10 -0500, Karl Groves
<karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote: >Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in >news:bhq2e2t6e4s1t20jj7m0hctghjnu8lqgme@4ax.com : > >> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0500, Karl Groves >> <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote: >> >>>lastwhiteknights@hotmail.com wrote in news:1155597640.055937.208300@ >>>74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> GW Bush is getting away with it. ![]() >>>> >>>> Georgie isn't getting away with anything. Don't think that he is - >>>> just because no one has the balls to stand up for America. We all >>>> know that he was one of the scumbags most responsible for planning >>>> and executing the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. >>> >>>I'm no fan of GWB, but you're a major fucking kook if you think there >>>was someone other than al queda who is responsible for 9/11 >> >> Like I said, we seem to be attracting them lately. And now we've got >> Karl, too! >> > >I love you too, Bill. I know! - isn't it wonderful? BB -- http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|