On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:50:38 +0200, ".:J:."
<MONKEYselskab-at-bigfoot.com> wrote:

>
>> You know Google reshuffled their algo? The Adsense one? Did you hear
>> about that at all?
>>
>> BB
>>
>> --
>> http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
>> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html
>
>Yes I heard that. But I haven't seen this kind of drop on my other sites
>like this one ?
>
>/Jakob

What did you use to make this one, same as the others or different
software? I can't see Smarticlecomposer sites lasting five minutes.

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

>>
>>/Jakob
>
> What did you use to make this one, same as the others or different
> software? I can't see Smarticlecomposer sites lasting five minutes.
>
> BB
> --
> http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html




Hi Bill

I used Wordpress and manually entered the content. Not any Page generation
sw.

BTW Bill, found these comercials from Denmark, thought of you Are any of
these figures you ????

Top three pictures on this page leads to the links below (videos):
http://www.editorial.tele2.dk/?page=...2_billsfanside

http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...kia_060329.htm
http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...ens_060329.htm
http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...bio_060329.htm

Rgds
Jakob

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:41:11 +0200, ".:J:."
<MONKEYselskab-at-bigfoot.com> wrote:

>>>
>>>/Jakob
>>
>> What did you use to make this one, same as the others or different
>> software? I can't see Smarticlecomposer sites lasting five minutes.
>>
>> BB
>> --
>> http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
>> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html
>
>
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>I used Wordpress and manually entered the content. Not any Page generation
>sw.
>
>BTW Bill, found these comercials from Denmark, thought of you Are any of
>these figures you ????
>
>Top three pictures on this page leads to the links below (videos):
>http://www.editorial.tele2.dk/?page=...2_billsfanside
>
>http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...kia_060329.htm
>http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...ens_060329.htm
>http://resources.tele2.dk/video/vide...bio_060329.htm
>
>Rgds
>Jakob
>

Sadly, no, but you know that movie The 13th Warrior? With the
lamentable exceptions of Sharif and Banderas, they're all me. All the
Viking warriors, they're me. All the Viking women, they're me. Horses,
they were me. Trees...

BB
--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

>
> Sadly, no, but you know that movie The 13th Warrior? With the
> lamentable exceptions of Sharif and Banderas, they're all me. All the
> Viking warriors, they're me. All the Viking women, they're me. Horses,
> they were me. Trees...
>
> BB
> --
> http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

So you are a tree ???

I answered your question, I've only used wordpress to enter content. Not
some auto-page-generating tool ?

Rgds
Jakob

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:03:11 +0200, ".:J:."
<MONKEYselskab-at-bigfoot.com> wrote:

>
>>
>> Sadly, no, but you know that movie The 13th Warrior? With the
>> lamentable exceptions of Sharif and Banderas, they're all me. All the
>> Viking warriors, they're me. All the Viking women, they're me. Horses,
>> they were me. Trees...
>>
>> BB
>> --
>> http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
>> http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html
>
>So you are a tree ???
>
>I answered your question, I've only used wordpress to enter content. Not
>some auto-page-generating tool ?

I got distracted. I do that when I'm funny. I remember one time... but
anyhoo, I think you've got caught up in the problems Google's giving
everybody with Adsense pages. You'll know that potential clickers
don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
that. I think that for a lot of affiliates and affiliate-type sites,
what used to work works no longer and won't ever again. You had to be
there.

BB



--
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/mar...e-pictures.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-maintenance.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/artis...una-glass.html

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:14 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>I do that when I'm funny.

I must have missed that.

--
Advertise your American Indian Art http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Forums/rent.html or web site.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:14 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>I think you've got caught up in the problems Google's giving
>everybody with Adsense pages.

I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
with AdSense or Google search per se.

>You'll know that potential clickers
>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>that.

First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
where are you getting this information from bill?

>I think that for a lot of affiliates and affiliate-type sites,
>what used to work works no longer and won't ever again. You had to be
>there.

But what's that got to do with AdSense?

To the OP if you are using WordPress checkout the sig, converting some
WordPress themes to have AdSense ads (edit one file to add your
AdSense client number and you have a blog with ads).

David
--
WordPress Themes with AdSense ads
http://www.morearnings.com/category/wordpress-themes/
AdSense Tips http://www.morearnings.com/2006/05/08/adsense-revenue/

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:03:06 GMT, David
<seodave@search-engine-optimization-services.co.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:14 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>I think you've got caught up in the problems Google's giving
>>everybody with Adsense pages.
>
>I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
>affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
>content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
>with AdSense or Google search per se.
>
>>You'll know that potential clickers
>>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>>that.
>
>First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
>where are you getting this information from bill?

You're asking me now? This was big talk in Adsense circles um, a
month, 6 weeks ago? You never hear of any of this stuff, no? You don't
get input from newsletters, anything like that?

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:6si3e25nvbrat63tm2fe6klj94c4u4ih11@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:03:06 GMT, David
> <seodave@search-engine-optimization-services.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:14 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I think you've got caught up in the problems Google's giving
>>>everybody with Adsense pages.
>>
>>I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
>>affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
>>content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
>>with AdSense or Google search per se.
>>
>>>You'll know that potential clickers
>>>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>>>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>>>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>>>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>>>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>>>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>>>that.
>>
>>First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
>>where are you getting this information from bill?
>
> You're asking me now? This was big talk in Adsense circles um, a
> month, 6 weeks ago? You never hear of any of this stuff, no? You don't
> get input from newsletters, anything like that?
>
> BB
> --
>
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm


I think that Google now considers 90% of the pages on that site as
"Supplemental results". Don't think that was the case before ?

Rgds
Jakob

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:33:17 +0200, ".:J:."
<MONKEYselskab-at-bigfoot.com> wrote:

>
>"Big Bill" <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:6si3e25nvbrat63tm2fe6klj94c4u4ih11@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:03:06 GMT, David
>> <seodave@search-engine-optimization-services.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:14 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think you've got caught up in the problems Google's giving
>>>>everybody with Adsense pages.
>>>
>>>I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
>>>affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
>>>content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
>>>with AdSense or Google search per se.
>>>
>>>>You'll know that potential clickers
>>>>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>>>>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>>>>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>>>>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>>>>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>>>>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>>>>that.
>>>
>>>First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
>>>where are you getting this information from bill?
>>
>> You're asking me now? This was big talk in Adsense circles um, a
>> month, 6 weeks ago? You never hear of any of this stuff, no? You don't
>> get input from newsletters, anything like that?
>>
>> BB
>> --
>>
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm
>
>
>I think that Google now considers 90% of the pages on that site as
>"Supplemental results". Don't think that was the case before ?
>
>Rgds
>Jakob

Google does have their indexes mixed at the moment.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

>>>>>everybody with Adsense pages.
>>>>
>>>>I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
>>>>affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
>>>>content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
>>>>with AdSense or Google search per se.
>>>>
>>>>>You'll know that potential clickers
>>>>>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>>>>>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>>>>>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>>>>>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>>>>>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>>>>>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>>>>>that.
>>>>
>>>>First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
>>>>where are you getting this information from bill?
>>>
>>> You're asking me now? This was big talk in Adsense circles um, a
>>> month, 6 weeks ago? You never hear of any of this stuff, no? You don't
>>> get input from newsletters, anything like that?
>>>
>>> BB
>>> --
>>>
>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm
>>
>>
>>I think that Google now considers 90% of the pages on that site as
>>"Supplemental results". Don't think that was the case before ?
>>
>>Rgds
>>Jakob
>
> Google does have their indexes mixed at the moment.
>
> BB
> --


Hmmmm, as mentioned ealier, I've seen a 90% drop in adsense income and
traffic. Could the "supplemental results" have anything to do with this ?

Cheers
Jakob

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:59:38 +0200, ".:J:."
<MONKEYselskab-at-bigfoot.com> wrote:

>>>>>>everybody with Adsense pages.
>>>>>
>>>>>I use AdSense on a LOT of sites and other than Google filtering
>>>>>affiliate content from it's organic search results (so affiliate
>>>>>content gets less visitors, so less click on ads) I see no problem
>>>>>with AdSense or Google search per se.
>>>>>
>>>>>>You'll know that potential clickers
>>>>>>don't want distractions like relevant content or links to anything
>>>>>>like that, they just want to feel trapped and have to click their way
>>>>>>(through an adsense link, curiously always handy) back to eventual
>>>>>>sanity. Google have decided against that, they want all Adsense pages
>>>>>>to be mines of information, a moving experience, so that no-one need
>>>>>>click on an Adsense link ever again. I'm guessing you're caught up in
>>>>>>that.
>>>>>
>>>>>First I've heard of it and not seeing this on any of my sites. So
>>>>>where are you getting this information from bill?
>>>>
>>>> You're asking me now? This was big talk in Adsense circles um, a
>>>> month, 6 weeks ago? You never hear of any of this stuff, no? You don't
>>>> get input from newsletters, anything like that?
>>>>
>>>> BB
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
>>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
>>>> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>I think that Google now considers 90% of the pages on that site as
>>>"Supplemental results". Don't think that was the case before ?
>>>
>>>Rgds
>>>Jakob
>>
>> Google does have their indexes mixed at the moment.
>>
>> BB
>> --
>
>
>Hmmmm, as mentioned ealier, I've seen a 90% drop in adsense income and
>traffic. Could the "supplemental results" have anything to do with this ?

It very likely means that they don't come up in a search the same way
they used to. It is entirely possible that you're indexed in the
supplementals by mistake, by the way. Google is a whole lot less fun
since it turned into a lottery.

BB
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm

>>> BB
>>> --
>>
>>
>>Hmmmm, as mentioned ealier, I've seen a 90% drop in adsense income and
>>traffic. Could the "supplemental results" have anything to do with this ?
>
> It very likely means that they don't come up in a search the same way
> they used to. It is entirely possible that you're indexed in the
> supplementals by mistake, by the way. Google is a whole lot less fun
> since it turned into a lottery.
>
> BB
> --
>
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/affordable-we...n-services.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
> http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-home-page.htm


Should consider redesigning the template and content. That might make them
want to reindex and include the pages once again ?

Cheers