|
|
|
#26 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
At 10:47:30 on Fri, 7 Mar 2008 gecko opined:-
>Maybe there's an Alps group out there somewhere dedicated to keeping >these abandoned marvels going and sharing information. > >How about it? Anyone know of one? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alps/ -- Thoss |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
At 11:24:48 on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 Arthur Entlich opined:-
>I haven't looked at the exact specifications for this printer, so my >comments previously are generalized for most dye sub processes. I >probably should have asked for a definitive answer as to if the dyesub >or the microdot solid ink ribbons are being used, since the technology >is different. Not all Alps MDs can do dye-sub, so it depends which model he has. The MD 1300 has it by default, on the MD 5000 it's an extra. I don't think any other model (other than Oki's re-badged version of the 5000) is dye- sub capable. -- Thoss |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:24:19 +0100, Owen Ransen <willy@wonker.com>
wrote: >On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:53:46 GMT, Arthur Entlich ><e-printer@mvps.org> wrote: > >>I'm afraid there are many incorrect statements and conclusions in your >>friend's commentary and I'd like to clarify them. >> >>We do not see white as white because we know it is. Our eyes have a >>chemical "color balancing" system which corrects for color temperature >>up to a point. Our cones, which are responsible for our color vision >>come in three versions, interestingly, sensitive to red, green and blue, >>which are the primary colors of light. > >I'm afraid that is an incorrect statement. Light does not "have >three primary colors", light is a continuum of frequencies from >infra-red to ultra violet. > >Red green and blue receptors *evolved* to become the "primary" colors >which our eyes use, but for color *two* primary colors would have >been enough, (had an intelligent engineer been worried about >efficiency). One at the red end and one at the blue end, and color >could have been percieved as a linear mix of the two colors. > >This is a bit like our perception of heat. Color (more precisely >"hue" can be specified by a single number) just as heat can be >specified by a single number. > >Read "Vision and Art: The biology of seeing" by Margaret Livingstone >to find out more about how we percieve with our eyes. > > > > >Easy to use graphics effects: >http://www.ransen.com/ Thanks Arthur & Owen! Here is my friend's response: I have to accept that I am a walking encyclopedia of outdated scientific information and folklore. I hope you have a way of thanking these guys for their thoughtful responses. It kind of brings me up to date with my understanding of scientific "facts." I was quoting gospel according to Eastman's color scientists, overlooking how long ago that was. My deep immersion in color photography took place in the 1960s --- which apparently places my "knowledge" in close proximity with the flat-earth theory. But even back then I never fully understood everything I knew. For instance, how I could control the three primary colors with just magenta and yellow (the second respondent refers to this). Or why a heavy orange mask is required for color negatives. Or how to deal with the witch's brew of chemicals that changed color characteristics daily whether used or not. I still have what's left of my last 100-foot roll of 70mm Ektacolor in my freezer, fully expecting some day to get back to it. Incidentally, back then I built my color lab from parts scrounged from junk yards, mostly from vending machines that brewed and dispensed coffee. I found a treasure of stainless steel tanks, solenoid valves, calrods, tubing, relays, thermostats, pumps. I devised a way to maintain my chemicals within the required + / - 1/4 degree tolerance by fooling the thermostat with water pumped directly on it from the other end of the sink. My old Alps is a dye sublimation printer with ribbons for primary colors plus black. Now I understand a bit more about how it produces such stunning photos. I didn't know it could modulate the amount of dye it deposited. That didn't appear so from my examination of spent ribbons, but maybe I didn't un spool enough. I'm wondering now whether the Xerox Phaser color printer, which melts solid inks much as the Alps does, is capable of similar high color quality. My impression is that it sacrifices quality for speed. |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:23:27 +0000, thoss <usenet@amolad.org.uk>
wrote: > >Not all Alps MDs can do dye-sub, so it depends which model he has. The >MD 1300 has it by default, on the MD 5000 it's an extra. I don't think >any other model (other than Oki's re-badged version of the 5000) is dye- >sub capable. My friend said his is the MD 4000. -Gecko |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur: |
OK, I have some backpedaling to do then...
I just did some research on this model and it does NOT accept the dye sublimation cartridges, only the microdot pigment and resin/wax types. Therefore, I have to revamp my comments. This printer does use dithering to create it's colors. The company claims it's drivers use a 24 bit color depth, meaning that in principal each color (cyan, magenta and yellow) create the illusion of 256 color levels each. They do this by using different patterns/screens of color dots versus white paper showing through. In theory, this should create 16.8 million colors. This cartridge pack uses a black ribbon as well. The dye sub ribbon pack (used on the 1300, 2300 and 5000 with optional adapter) uses a 3 color pack (CMY) plus clear coat, to protect and to lessen fading from UV light. The reviews claim the image quality was "better than some inkjet printers", but that was a few years back and I'm, not sure that will still hold true with inkjet printers which have up to 12 color inks and very tight resolutions up to 6000 dpi. Inkjet printer do require specially coated papers to hold dot gain (bleeding) down so if they compared the two using regular bond paper, then the ALPS would definitely look better in most cases. The advantage to the microdot ALPS system is: the colorants are pure pigment with an adhesive resin. They are waterproof. They can be printed onto almost any paper surface. They can be transferred to other products using a heat press and special transfer papers. The "ink" doesn't bleed at all meaning a very small and sharp dot. And since the ALPS is using a dry solid ink, it can use white, gold, foils, etc and print onto clear decal materials with opaque ink. I believe the company is out of business, so one is reliant on 3rd party ribbons and service and parts may be somewhat of a problem. Also, they had a problem with banding. I remember reading the fix was to gently heat the print with a hair dryer to remove the bands. Art gecko wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:23:27 +0000, thoss <usenet@amolad.org.uk> > wrote: > > >>Not all Alps MDs can do dye-sub, so it depends which model he has. The >>MD 1300 has it by default, on the MD 5000 it's an extra. I don't think >>any other model (other than Oki's re-badged version of the 5000) is dye- >>sub capable. > > > > My friend said his is the MD 4000. > > -Gecko |
|
![]() |
| Outils de la discussion | |
|
|