PHWinfo - Afficher un message - is there an nicer way for this expression?

20/11/2007, 15h24

On Nov 20, 7:38 am, Remco Hh <re...@huijdts.nl> wrote:
> hi,
> perhaps a stupid question.
>
> i do this a lot: if (foo.bar==1 or foo.bar==2)
>
> can i make this expression shorter and nicer?,
> something like if (foo.bar=1,2), which of course doesn't work

One way:

if [1,2].include?(foo.bar)
# ...
end

another:

case foo.bar when 1,2 then
# ...
end

T.

20/11/2007, 15h24	#11
Trans Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: is there an nicer way for this expression? On Nov 20, 7:38 am, Remco Hh <re...@huijdts.nl> wrote: > hi, > perhaps a stupid question. > > i do this a lot: if (foo.bar==1 or foo.bar==2) > > can i make this expression shorter and nicer?, > something like if (foo.bar=1,2), which of course doesn't work One way: if [1,2].include?(foo.bar) # ... end another: case foo.bar when 1,2 then # ... end T.