On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net>
wrote:
> "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news
p.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
>
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...hinkagain.php?
>
> Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best addressed
> in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTML
> instead of HTML though.
Hmm, quoting gone wrong?
> What?!
> But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing.
> What about using XHTML makes this harder?
Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with
<?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so
much harder, no.
--
Rik Wasmus