In article <7ncku4-02f.ln1@news.individual.net>,
Richard <rgrdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> writes:
>
>> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>> In article <4716fe20.8048823@news.xs4all.nl>,
>>> Richard Bos <rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl> wrote:
>>>> gentoo user <happy_gentooer@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> today I found this thread in gnu.misc.discuss "GPL question"
>>>>>
>>>>> mike cox is asking the following questions about lcc-win32........
>>>> I would suggest asking questions about ferrets in a rec.pets.ferrets,
>>>> questions about C# in microsoft.public.java.badly-stolen, and questions
>>>> about lcc, including those about lcc-win32, in comp.compilers.lcc. And
>>>> that for the same reason in all cases.
>>>
>>> Navia-bashing is very much on-topic-by-definition here.
>>> It's in the FAQ.
>>
>> Note two things:

OBCheapShot: How many things?

>> 1) Only Kenny McCormack mentioned Navia, so if anyone is bashing Navia
>> it is Kenny McCormack.
>> 2) There is no bashing at all in Richard Bos's post to which Kenny
>> McCormack replied. It is only Kenny McCormack who brought bashing to
>> the table.
>> 3) There is absolutely no positive content in Kenny McCormack's
>> asinine post. It takes a microscope to find any content at all thee.
>
>You need to recalibrate.
>
>KM was hinting that any discussion involving lcc-win32 would invariably
>be simply Navia bashing in this friendly newsgroup.

Exactly. There was a mention of lcc-win32, and that of course, is
Navia-bashing directly or it will assuredly lead to it.