Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> writes:

> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> In article <4716fe20.8048823@news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Richard Bos <rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl> wrote:
>>> gentoo user <happy_gentooer@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> today I found this thread in gnu.misc.discuss "GPL question"
>>>>
>>>> mike cox is asking the following questions about lcc-win32........
>>> I would suggest asking questions about ferrets in a rec.pets.ferrets,
>>> questions about C# in microsoft.public.java.badly-stolen, and questions
>>> about lcc, including those about lcc-win32, in comp.compilers.lcc. And
>>> that for the same reason in all cases.
>>
>> Navia-bashing is very much on-topic-by-definition here.
>> It's in the FAQ.
>
> Note two things:
> 1) Only Kenny McCormack mentioned Navia, so if anyone is bashing Navia
> it is Kenny McCormack.
> 2) There is no bashing at all in Richard Bos's post to which Kenny
> McCormack replied. It is only Kenny McCormack who brought bashing to
> the table.
> 3) There is absolutely no positive content in Kenny McCormack's
> asinine post. It takes a microscope to find any content at all thee.

You need to recalibrate.

KM was hinting that any discussion involving lcc-win32 would invariably
be simply Navia bashing in this friendly newsgroup.