In article <1192709803.337855.324270@q3g2000prf.googlegroups. com>,
<vipvipvipvip.ru@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 18, 2:27 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@see.sig.invalid> wrote:
>> Everyone makes mistakes - what counts
>> is not that we make them, but how we react when we discover them.
>Well, what options where available at the time?
>Either change the project, or GPL it, or infringe GPL.
>
>jacob navia:
>Why not GPL your project? or at least make the source available?
>It would save you from trouble, and it would certainly save heaps
>of your time, that is if other people find it interesting and decide
>to contribute.

I, along with a lot of other people, think that Microsoft should GPL
their code. Then hackers around the world could post line-by-line
critiques of their code (which surely deserves it far more than any
newbie posting to CLC) and we'd have real fun.