Re: pointer offsetting
Barry Schwarz wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:44:02 +0000 (UTC), $)CHarald van D)&k
> <truedfx@gmail.com> wrote:
....
>> Undefined behaviour is inherently implementation dependent.
>>
> Implementation dependent implies that the behavior will be consistent
> on a particular implementation (the same today as it was yesterday).
Citation, please?
"Implementation-dependent behavior" isn't a term defined in the C
standard. It's normal English meaning is only that the behavior depends
upon which implementation you use, which is certainly true for undefined
behavior. I don't see any implication that the behavior has to be
consistent.
|