"Richard Heathfield" <rjh@see.sig.invalid> a écrit dans le message de news:
zO6dnd8IDeQubonanZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
> Charlie Gordon said:
>
> <snip>
>
>> No, IMHO, you should publish the source, as is done for gcc and lcc.
>
> Provided there are no legal objections (e.g. GPL "pollution"), isn't it up
> to him what he does with his source code?
>
> I wouldn't care to put an accurate figure on the percentage of my code
> that
> I publish, but it makes up a very small percentage of the code I write.
> How much I publish is my decision, not yours. I see no reason why the same
> shouldn't apply to Mr Navia.

I was merely making a joke with an afterthought.

I am not ordering Jacob anything. I just expressed my opinion about
lcc-win32 and the best way IMHO to improve it, promote it, and provide for
an alternative to M$ lock on W$ development tools and methodology.
Publishing the source code is of course his decision (and his co-authors if
any).

--
Chqrlie.