Ann W. Harrison, on 09/09/2007 01:59 PM said:
>
> That's less likely with Falcon than with engines that put each
> table and index in its own file. By default, Falcon tables share
> a single tablespace.
>

Forgive the probably very naïve question, but I am confused about
something; if I am understanding correctly, you are saying that in this
respect, Falcon stores tables much like InnoDB in that it uses a file
that holds multiple tables, is that correct? What is the performance
advantage in this, if any? Does each database get its own file, or is
it some sort of global thing?

Thanks,
Mike

--
Michael B. Trausch http://www.trausch.us/
Pidgin 2.1.1 and plugins for Ubuntu Feisty!
(And Thunderbird 2.0.0.6, too!) http://www.trausch.us/pidgin