Discussion: com_dotnet
Afficher un message
Vieux 13/09/2007, 18h27   #29
Steve
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: com_dotnet

<snip>

> I did. And you're still telling me other modules say their extensions can
> be loaded and show up as enabled, even though the necessary libraries
> aren't installed. Again, which ones are those?
>
>> am i going to hear back from you on this post? i'd be embarrassed to had
>> i done the same thing. but it takes a certain kind of person to step back
>> from such a defensive position as you've taken and say that, indeed, "i
>> just misunderstood what you were explaining".
>>
>> we'll see.

>
> Then you should be embarrassed for your incorrect statements.


"incorrect" would be purely speculative given that i asked you to back up
your posit with either a documented reference or actually trying it. as it
is, i know for a fact that i can enable .net support in php by loading its
corresponding php .net extension library (.dll) at run-time yet not have the
actual ms .net framework installed. you say it's a bug...i say "whatever".

as it is, i still think you are talking apples when the rest of us are
talking oranges. but, i'm done discussing this.


  Réponse avec citation
 
Page generated in 0,05176 seconds with 9 queries