Discussion: com_dotnet
Afficher un message
Vieux 12/09/2007, 03h45   #6
Steve
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: com_dotnet

"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:MNHFi.2377$Sd4.1809@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Jim Carlock wrote:
>
>> And I'm wondering why PHP says .net support = enabled where
>> ..net is NOT installed. I'm baffled by this one. It appears PHP
>> looks for one specific file and it exists, PHP declares .net
>> enabled, but .net is actually at least a 50MB package of files
>> which fill a few folders.

>
> I seem to recall something from the docs in which the PHP folks strangely
> note that this is just a place-holder for something they hope to have PHP
> doing in the future.


again, your recall is weak and with a little investigation on your part, you
could keep yourself from embarasment. the documentation simply states that:

======
This extension is EXPERIMENTAL. The behaviour of this extension -- including
the names of its functions and anything else documented about this
extension -- may change without notice in a future release of PHP. Use this
extension at your own risk.

======

now, does that sound *ANYTHING* like what you just dribbled from your
keyboard?

> It's kinda like building a car with a sticker where the gas gauge should
> be.


more like an example of the twainian proverb:

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool
than to open it and remove all doubt.

which is what the bulk of your posts consist of...opening your yap and
removing all doubt.


  Réponse avec citation
 
Page generated in 0,05393 seconds with 9 queries