"mark" <nyob@nyob.com> wrote in message
news:VJVHi.54346$YL5.35580@newssvr29.news.prodigy. net...
>i uase blue host and they seem to be good. i did use powweb but they
>sucked.

Likewise, I use bluehost.com - after seeing recommendations here and have
been quite happy with them.

In the context of the OP's post, bluehost "only" offer 300GB of storage. I
think their Ts&Cs contain a comment about the amount/proportion of cpu time
that a site may use, likewise about files being for web rather than backup
etc. So all the comments about large amounts of web space that have been
made to the OP's post are probably all valid.
--
Brian Cryer
www.cryer.co.uk/brian