Afficher un message
Vieux 06/09/2007, 23h18   #10
The Moose
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: Index.html with image represented by file name instead of red-X??

On Sep 5, 7:44 pm, Blinky the Shark <no.s...@box.invalid> wrote:
> John Hosking wrote:
> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
> >> John Hosking wrote:
> >>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> >>>> The Moose wrote:

>
> >>>>> The results will be like:
> >>>>>http://chocolate-moose.p5.org.uk/MINIS/barbara.html
> >>>> A blank page?
> >>> The cleanest source ever produced with MS software involved!
> >>> <html><body></body></html>

>
> >> I don't even get that; source view has not a single character.

>
> > Ah, well now I'm thinking it's a function of the browser. The "source"

>
> Guess not...
>
> > above was in FF, Opera gives me nothing, and in IE6 I get all of this:

>
> ...it was in FF that I saw no text at all in source.
>
> ><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> ><HTML><HEAD>
> ><META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html;
> > charset=windows-1252"></HEAD>
> ><BODY></BODY></HTML>

>
> > I guess each browser assumes certain defaults...

>
> --
> Blinky RLU 297263
> Killing all posts from Google Groups
> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28


You guys!!! It's not a blank page. My "service" provider wasn't
allowing uploads. It's there now.

Why should I pay when *FREE* works so well :GRIN:

Barb

  Réponse avec citation
 
Page generated in 0,05418 seconds with 9 queries